| Seattle woman attempts to marry 107 year old building. Says despite their differences, the marriage will have a solid foundation |
||
| Add Comment | ||
| Showing 1-50 of 94 comments | ||
| Refresh | Page 2 | |
| JasonOfOrillia
We were told this would happen if gay marriage became legal. THIS IS ALL YOUR FAULT SHEEPLE! |
||
| tankjr
JasonOfOrillia: We were told this would happen if gay marriage became legal. THIS IS ALL YOUR FAULT SHEEPLE! done in one |
||
| Tornado of Zoo Animals
JasonOfOrillia: We were told this would happen if gay marriage became legal. THIS IS ALL YOUR FAULT SHEEPLE! Leaving satisfied... |
||
| butt-nuggets
maybe she should just marry a dildo |
||
| AbbeySomeone I may attend. |
||
| GreenSun
The building can't say NO. |
||
| Herb Utsmelz She does realize it's been over 100 years since her hubby-to-be had an erection, right? |
||
shanrick |
||
Pants full of macaroni!! |
||
| gweilo8888
Subby: "Seattle woman FTFY |
||
| 1.21jigawatts
Someone call Eric Cartman. |
||
| Aar1012 FTA - "'If corporations can have the rights as people, so can buildings' said Aivaz, referencing a Supreme Court decision on political advertising." ![]() STARE DECISIS DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY! /GOOD NIGHT! |
||
| Phoenix87ta
Herb Utsmelz: She does realize it's been over 100 years since her hubby-to-be had an erection, right? Well played, well played indeed. /I snrked. |
||
| lack of warmth
Now we move on to people and aliens can marry, living and non-living can marry and one day we may even allow robots and people marry. /the mormons would be interested in marrying dead people, being they believe in celestial marriage |
||
| Whistler36 Is it built like a brick house? Is she? Is anyone? |
||
| butt-nuggets
or maybe "she's a brick ... house" chick a dow dow |
||
| snowjack In spite of Thursday events, Aivaz remained spirited about her planned wedding. She described the event as a community potluck, and asked attendees to "BRING FOOOOOOOOD~." ![]() LULZ |
||
| Gyrfalcon
But does the BUILDING want to marry her, is the next question. If the building can knowingly and voluntarily consent, then I have no problem with this. |
||
| I Have The Touch of a Shocked Monkey HOTY candidate in the pun section. |
||
| zvoidx
I'd like to hear the husband's side of the story. /he must be floored |
||
| suthrnrunt
so..... if she marries the building and uses a dildo, is she cheating on the building? |
||
| DreamSnipers
That woman doesn't know my name, my address, or even of my existence. I like that a lot. |
||
| Oldiron_79
So when does the turtle farking start? |
||
| Amishrabbit
Proto-robosexual? |
||
| Hokum
suthrnrunt: so..... if she marries the building and uses a dildo, is she cheating on the building? So if I enter that building and rub one out, would the building be cheating on her? If so i have a marriage to ruin. |
||
| suthrnrunt
Hokum: suthrnrunt: so..... if she marries the building and uses a dildo, is she cheating on the building? So if I enter that building and rub one out, would the building be cheating on her? If so i have a marriage to ruin. I think that would be raping the building :) |
||
| Hokum
suthrnrunt: Hokum: suthrnrunt: so..... if she marries the building and uses a dildo, is she cheating on the building? So if I enter that building and rub one out, would the building be cheating on her? If so i have a marriage to ruin. I think that would be raping the building :) Hey it was asking for it... well it didn't say no... and it was erect at the time. |
||
| skinink
She was previously married to an elevator. That marriage didn't last because it had too many ups and downs. |
||
| GungFu
Ugly Fat White Women Atttention Whore Problems. |
||
| New Farkin User Name
"If corporations can have the rights as people, so can buildings," What she said is either completely insane, or THE MOST SENSE ANYBODY HAS EVER MADE!!! This decision makes more sense than the Supreme Court case. /Next is she going to marry the company Trojan? |
||
| suthrnrunt
Hokum: suthrnrunt: Hokum: suthrnrunt: so..... if she marries the building and uses a dildo, is she cheating on the building? So if I enter that building and rub one out, would the building be cheating on her? If so i have a marriage to ruin. I think that would be raping the building :) Hey it was asking for it... well it didn't say no... and it was erect at the time. I think they might not go for that cause last time i checked you couldn't rub one out on an invalid no matter how much dirty adult diapers turn you on. |
||
| Hagenhatesyouall
GreenSun: The building can't say NO. Who are you to say who she can and can't marry? Arranged marriages have taken place for thousands of years. Consent is immaterial. |
||
| UsikFark
butt-nuggets: maybe she should just marry a dildo That would be a shaky marriage. And same for the building, if Seattle gets a big one. /giggidy. |
||
| suthrnrunt
Hagenhatesyouall: GreenSun: The building can't say NO. Who are you to say who she can and can't marry? Arranged marriages have taken place for thousands of years. Consent is immaterial. i think you are missing a key point in your own argument. Arranged marriages have two parties involved, so there is someone speaking for both members of the marriage. Where is the 2nd party that speaks for the building? to dumb it down for you, if the owner of the building doesn't consent to the fat one marrying their building, she can not marry the building. |
||
| trillium13
This one married the Berlin Wall, and wrote about it. Eija-Riitta Berliner-Mauer-A Berlin Wall Love Story (new window) |
||
| lisa0012
There's another woman who goes on talk shows talking about how she's in love with the Eiffel Tower and the Berlin Wall. This one's an amateur. Not impressed. |
||
| Eponymous
Maybe a building is the only thing that would put up with her..... She does seem like the type that when growing up had to have a pork chop tied around her neck so the dog would play with her. |
||
| four95
<b><a href="http://www.fark.com/comments/690 8524/74620973#c74620973" target="_blank">gweilo8888</a>:</b> <i><b>Subby:</b> "Seattle woman <strike>attempts to marry 107 year old building. Says despite their differences, the marriage will have a solid foundation</strike> is <strike><b>an attention whore</b></strike> <b>bat-shiat crazy</b>."</i> FTFY |
||
| four95
Let's try that again... gweilo8888: Subby: "Seattle woman |
||
| Hagenhatesyouall
suthrnrunt: Hagenhatesyouall: GreenSun: The building can't say NO. Who are you to say who she can and can't marry? Arranged marriages have taken place for thousands of years. Consent is immaterial. i think you are missing a key point in your own argument. Arranged marriages have two parties involved, so there is someone speaking for both members of the marriage. Where is the 2nd party that speaks for the building? to dumb it down for you, if the owner of the building doesn't consent to the fat one marrying their building, she can not marry the building. And if consent IS granted by said owner? Well, then, of COURSE we should honor the "marriage"! |
||
| DreamSnipers
trillium13: This one married the Berlin Wall, and wrote about it. Eija-Riitta Berliner-Mauer-A Berlin Wall Love Story (new window) I found that story comforting. It is comforting to know that the US and Great Britain don't have a monopoly on all the world's non AK-47 armed whack jobs, and comforting to know she is a long way away. |
||
| suthrnrunt
Hagenhatesyouall: suthrnrunt: Hagenhatesyouall: GreenSun: The building can't say NO. Who are you to say who she can and can't marry? Arranged marriages have taken place for thousands of years. Consent is immaterial. i think you are missing a key point in your own argument. Arranged marriages have two parties involved, so there is someone speaking for both members of the marriage. Where is the 2nd party that speaks for the building? to dumb it down for you, if the owner of the building doesn't consent to the fat one marrying their building, she can not marry the building. And if consent IS granted by said owner? Well, then, of COURSE we should honor the "marriage"! yes, if for no other reason than for the owner of the building to have the building divorce her the moment she uses a spin cycle for pleasure. |
||
| fracas
Oh man. I saw that building with some hussy from Code Enforcement. Should I speak now, or forever hold my peace? |
||
| 404 page not found
As long as the building is a male, what's the problem? ONE MAN, ONE WOMEN. |
||
| phunkey_monkey
For Pete sakes, that woman should let the century old building die with dignity.I highly doubt that the building would like to get 'laid in public' a second time. |
||
| DreamSnipers
trillium13: This one married the Berlin Wall, and wrote about it. Eija-Riitta Berliner-Mauer-A Berlin Wall Love Story (new window) I almost forgot, I have a piece of Eija's true love. Nephew brought it for me from Germany when he was visiting there. He thought it would be a cool gift. I thought so too. So far it hasn't done anything particularly strange, or loveable for that matter. |
||
| Gyrfalcon
404 page not found: As long as the building is a male, what's the problem? ONE MAN, ONE WOMEN. Women are plural. Guess our children don't be learning. |
||
| SweetSilverBlues
This is not a good thing. I give it six months, tops. She will be disillusioned by the huge age difference, and the fact that her husband is, let's face it, not exactly structurally secure for the types of relations she's going to expect. Eventually she'll turn to the doors of some young, glass and steel behemoth for comfort. It won't mean anything, since the recession the young'un is all flash and no cash. He'll be empty inside. Still, she'll leave her well-intentioned but woefully mismatched and solid husband for the shiny new toy. Only to realize she means less than nothing to him once that brand new lease gets signed by a hot young company with burgeoning assets amply displayed. She'll end up flitting from meaningless relationships with convenience stores, Wal-marts, and warehouses, lamenting the elderly security she once had. Finally she'll shack up with a taco hut and spawn a new generation of needy Quonset huts. Mark my words. |
||
| ace in your face
404 page not found: As long as the building is a male, what's the problem? ONE MAN, ONE WOMEN. Farking mormons. |
||
| bigbadideasinaction
Hagenhatesyouall: GreenSun: The building can't say NO. Who are you to say who she can and can't marry? Arranged marriages have taken place for thousands of years. Consent is immaterial. In fact, Republicans should be pushing for arranged marriages, seeing as they were the "traditional" way of doing them, right? |
||
| Showing 1-50 of 94 comments | ||
| Refresh | Page 2 | |
| This thread is closed to new comments. |
close