I would say that it should be "PAY the hooker..."

I wonder if the course will have lab time?

Or "Agreeing on a price upfront with your hooker"
Or "How to avoid getting yourself and your coworkers fired while patronizing hookers in South America"
Or "How to discretely handle a dubious monetary transaction in Columbia"

Any of these would be seem to be useful in today's Secret Service workplace.

Another reason to not be a Secret Service agent, besides taking a bullet.

Brennan Huff: I smoked pot with Johnny Hopkins.

Nancy Huff: You don't know anyone named Johnny Hopkins.

Brennan Huff: It was Johnny Hopkins, and Sloan Kettering, and they were blazin' that shiat up everyday.

glad to see that bastion of ethical behavior is at the forefront. Hats off to you, John Hopkin.


/No 's'... just because.

I hope they also cover "Don't Shoot Civilians to Death in a Waikiki McDonalds When You are Drunk in the Days before the President Arrives (in his Hometown) for APEC."

Or: "How to save your job and not be hated by your co-workers because you were too cheap to pay fifty dollars"

Shouldn't it be more like, "How to Not Get Caught..."?

Also offered as "Obvious 101" in the School of Hard Knocks.

Sounds like a 400 level class to me, Subby.

Jake Havechek: Brennan Huff: I smoked pot with Johnny Hopkins.

Nancy Huff: You don't know anyone named Johnny Hopkins.

Brennan Huff: It was Johnny Hopkins, and Sloan Kettering, and they were blazin' that shiat up everyday.

Came here for that. And Brennan has a mangina.

Mmmm freshmen

You would think they would be more secretive about getting serviced...

/zing!

I honestly don't see what the big deal/scandal is here. As far as I've read so far, they were off duty, they were in a place where prostitution is legal, they were spending their own money, and they broke no laws. Nothing was stolen, no one got hurt. These guys spent the money from their legal jobs to hire girls to do what they do for their legal jobs. Or are we telling Columbia what their laws must be, now?

Besides, it is absurd to try to hold them to priestly morality standards because they're bodyguards, not priests. Their job is to keep the president from getting hurt. That's it. So long as they do that (without excessive carnage) then they're doing their jobs right.

Throwing a bunch of morality based judgements at them is as stupid as dog sweaters. Yes, some people need to be held to higher standards of political correctness... but these guys? It's a slippery rope from this crap to telling them that they have to take sensitivity classes and use nothing but nerf bats tasers to protect the POTUS, lest they accidentally injure a would-be-assassin to badly.

Now if this happened within US borders, yes I could see a problem, because then they would have been breaking the law - US law at that - and that indeed would be cause for a scandal because that indeed falls within the realm of things we can unequivocally judge them on. But it didn't, so judging them as if it did is both illogical and, in itself, immoral.