| Old GOP plan: Convince people government is broken and can't do anything right. New GOP plan: Intentionally break government so it can't do anything right |
||
| Add Comment | ||
| Showing 1-50 of 197 comments | ||
| Refresh | Page 2 | |
| Serious Black
Paul Ryan is a farking assclown. |
||
| kronicfeld That's hardly a new plan from the GOP. |
||
| Lurking Fear It's only treason if the dems do it, right? |
||
| sweetmelissa31 That's been their plan for a long time. Remember Christie Whitman as head of the EPA? |
||
| Diogenes Obvious tag taking a three day weekend? |
||
Diogenes ![]() |
||
| Marcus Aurelius This has been the GOP's plan since 1980. Ronald Reagan was the first president ever re-elected on a platform of trying to destroy the federal government. |
||
| FlashHarry the GOP was planning that on the night of obama's inauguration. this is not an old plan. their motto is "Party Before Country." |
||
| GAT_00
New? *cough Medicare Part-D cough* |
||
| unlikely "New" plan as of 11-2008. Hardly counts as new. |
||
| RexTalionis "I'm not in favor of abolishing the government. I just want to shrink it down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub." -- Grover Norquist |
||
| SkinnyHead So that explains why Obama is a failure. I was wondering what went wrong. |
||
| Weaver95 obviously, the solution is more tax cuts for the rich. |
||
| Somacandra RexTalionis: "I'm not in favor of abolishing the government. I just want to shrink it down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub." Then we'll get overrun by the goddamn Chinese. -- Grover Norquist Fixed that for Grover. |
||
| FlashHarry |
||
| Weaver95 SkinnyHead: So that explains why Obama is a failure. I was wondering what went wrong. actually, Obama has done fairly well, considering the fact that the GOP has been out to destroy him since day one. that he's managed to get anything done at all under those circumstances is amazing. |
||
| Somacandra FTFA: No matter how much House Republicans claim to revere the autonomously acting free market, when push comes to shove, if the alternative is widespread economic collapse, Wall Street will get its bailout. Profits will be privatized, Losses will be publicly reimbursed. That's '[Corporate] Socialism American Style.' |
||
| Weaver95 Somacandra: FTFA: No matter how much House Republicans claim to revere the autonomously acting free market, when push comes to shove, if the alternative is widespread economic collapse, Wall Street will get its bailout. Profits will be privatized, Losses will be publicly reimbursed. That's '[Corporate] Socialism American Style.' And it's all thanks to George W. Bush. it took a right wing religious conservative Republican to make America into a socialist country. |
||
| FlashHarry Weaver95: considering the fact that the GOP has been out to destroy him since day one. this is literally true |
||
| Weaver95 FlashHarry: Weaver95: considering the fact that the GOP has been out to destroy him since day one. this is literally true indeed. it's not like the GOP has bothered to hide their agenda. they've been open about the plan to sacrifice this country in order to end Obama's administration. it's weird to see a GOP Congressman give a speech about 'national security' and 'keeping america strong' when at the same time they've planned on gutting the country in order to advance their short term political agenda. And the lies they tell themselves to justify those beliefs....*shudder* |
||
| SkinnyHead FlashHarry: Weaver95: considering the fact that the GOP has been out to destroy him since day one. this is literally true You mean the opposition party opposed him. That was mean of them. |
||
| Weaver95 SkinnyHead: FlashHarry: Weaver95: considering the fact that the GOP has been out to destroy him since day one. this is literally true You mean the opposition party opposed him. That was mean of them. not merely 'opposed' but dedicated themselves to Obama's destruction. this goes way beyond 'opposition party'...the GOP has been willing to sacrifice the country in order to defeat Obama. I've had the very distinct impression that the GOP would really like it if a very large terrorist attack would hit the US on Obama's watch. |
||
| Diogenes SkinnyHead: That was mean of them. When in order to fulfill their plans for opposition they must necessarily hurt the country and its people? Worse than mean. Reckless and unforgivable. Defeat him at the polls. Where you're supposed to. |
||
| Because People in power are Stupid sweetmelissa31: That's been their plan for a long time. Remember Christie Whitman as head of the EPA? Shutup and drink your arsenic. |
||
| FlashHarry SkinnyHead: FlashHarry: Weaver95: considering the fact that the GOP has been out to destroy him since day one. this is literally true You mean the opposition party opposed him. That was mean of them. they are deliberately harming millions of americans to further their political aims. |
||
| Weaver95 FlashHarry: SkinnyHead: FlashHarry: Weaver95: considering the fact that the GOP has been out to destroy him since day one. this is literally true You mean the opposition party opposed him. That was mean of them. they are deliberately harming millions of americans to further their political aims. But Its For The Greater Good! (the rallying cry of Lawful Evil societies everywhere). |
||
| sweetmelissa31 Arguing with SkinnyHead is like arguing with SkinnyHead. |
||
| Angry Drunk Bureaucrat |
||
| Lumpmoose |
||
| hubiestubert sweetmelissa31: Arguing with SkinnyHead is like arguing with SkinnyHead. Who? In order to have a battle of the wits, you have find someone who is at least armed. Well, and not just miming being pretarded... |
||
| TheBeastOfYuccaFlats SkinnyHead: FlashHarry: Weaver95: considering the fact that the GOP has been out to destroy him since day one. this is literally true You mean the opposition party opposed him. That was mean of them. Granted, you're a lousy troll, but in case anyone really wonders about the virtue of this argument: There's a difference between being an enemy of the President, and being the loyal opposition. The current GOP is *not* filling the latter role. |
||
| DirtyDeadGhostofEbenezerCooke
Wasn't that the Founding Fathers' whole 'checks and balances' thing? Design a government that trips all over itself and stays out of the way while we loot the continent? |
||
| SkinnyHead Diogenes: SkinnyHead: That was mean of them. When in order to fulfill their plans for opposition they must necessarily hurt the country and its people? Worse than mean. Reckless and unforgivable. Defeat him at the polls. Where you're supposed to. They did defeat him at the polls. Remember 2010? Obama took office vowing to "fundamentally change America," and he had majorities in both houses to do it. The voters elected a GOP majority in the house in 2010 to stop Obama, because they did not like the way he was trying to "fundamentally change America." If your failed quarterback can't move the ball, you don't blame the opposing team's defense and crybaby about how mean they are when they sack your quarterback, do you? You get a new quarterback. |
||
| Weaver95 SkinnyHead: Diogenes: SkinnyHead: That was mean of them. When in order to fulfill their plans for opposition they must necessarily hurt the country and its people? Worse than mean. Reckless and unforgivable. Defeat him at the polls. Where you're supposed to. They did defeat him at the polls. Remember 2010? Obama took office vowing to "fundamentally change America," and he had majorities in both houses to do it. The voters elected a GOP majority in the house in 2010 to stop Obama, because they did not like the way he was trying to "fundamentally change America." If your failed quarterback can't move the ball, you don't blame the opposing team's defense and crybaby about how mean they are when they sack your quarterback, do you? You get a new quarterback. we gotta try to keep our heads until this peace craze blows over! |
||
| Mentat SkinnyHead: If your failed quarterback can't move the ball, you don't blame the opposing team's defense and crybaby about how mean they are when they sack your quarterback, do you? You get a new quarterback. It's not football you farking moron. When the stadium is burning down and people are jumping out of the nose bleeds to escape, that's not the time to sack the quarterback. |
||
| thomps Mentat: SkinnyHead: If your failed quarterback can't move the ball, you don't blame the opposing team's defense and crybaby about how mean they are when they sack your quarterback, do you? You get a new quarterback. It's not football you farking moron. When the stadium is burning down and people are jumping out of the nose bleeds to escape, that's not the time to sack the quarterback. or you don't cheer when your team's linemen refuse to block for the quarterback because they want him to be injured so one of them can become quarterback. ostensibly, the american government is all on the same team with the goal of bettering the country. viewing it any other way is a big part of the problem. |
||
| SkinnyHead Weaver95: we gotta try to keep our heads until this peace craze blows over! That's a great scene, isn't it? "It's a hardball world, son." |
||
| SlothB77 we have to have these cuts because of democrat-instituted ponzi schemes like social security and medicare that drain all of the tax income the government takes in. you want to sabotage our government, create a new ponzi scheme like obamacare that will bury our government in a massive debt hole. |
||
| Jackson Herring |
||
| unlikely Mentat: SkinnyHead: If your failed quarterback can't move the ball, you don't blame the opposing team's defense and crybaby about how mean they are when they sack your quarterback, do you? You get a new quarterback. It's not football you farking moron. When the stadium is burning down and people are jumping out of the nose bleeds to escape, that's not the time to sack the quarterback. Especially when one team has blocked all the fire exits and started the fire to try to blame the opposing team's quarterback. |
||
| Lionel Mandrake "New?" |
||
| NuttierThanEver I can't stand it, I know you planned it But I'm gonna set it straight this watergate But I can't stand rockin' when I'm in this place Because I feel disgrace because you're all in my face But make no mistakes and switch up my channel I'm buddy rich when I fly off the handle What could it be, it's a mirage You're scheming on a thing - that's sabotage |
||
| Car_Ramrod They did defeat him at the polls. Remember 2010? Obama took office vowing to "fundamentally change America," and he had majorities in both houses to do it. The voters elected a GOP majority in the house in 2010 to stop Obama, because they did not like the way he was trying to "fundamentally change America." If the American people decided on giving Obama and the Democrats such numbers in Congress as well as the Presidency, why didn't the Republicans respect the will of the people and work with Democrats instead of fundamentally opposing them at every step? Why do Republicans hate the American people? |
||
| mainstreet62
Jackson Herring: sweetmelissa31: Arguing with S-------d is like arguing with S-------d. [i.imgur.com image 450x368] Wowwwwwwwww that's so wrong |
||
| abb3w kronicfeld: That's hardly a new plan from the GOP. They do seem to be getting less subtle about it. It's like they've shifted from treating a patient with leeches to using random amputations and organ removal. |
||
| SkinnyHead Car_Ramrod: If the American people decided on giving Obama and the Democrats such numbers in Congress as well as the Presidency, why didn't the Republicans respect the will of the people and work with Democrats instead of fundamentally opposing them at every step? Why do Republicans hate the American people? Because Obama was trying to fundamentally change America in a way that was not only bad for America, but in a way that the American People didn't want. GOP knew that, and that's why they won in 2010. So how come Obama and Democrats won't respect the will of the people and work with the House of Representatives instead of fundamentally opposing them at every step? |
||
| Diogenes SkinnyHead: So how come Obama and Democrats won't respect the will of the people Finally, we agree on something. Gay marriage should be legal. So say the people! You're a sad broken little toy, you. |
||
| mainstreet62
SkinnyHead: Car_Ramrod: If the American people decided on giving Obama and the Democrats such numbers in Congress as well as the Presidency, why didn't the Republicans respect the will of the people and work with Democrats instead of fundamentally opposing them at every step? Why do Republicans hate the American people? Because Obama was trying to fundamentally change America in a way that was not only bad for America, but in a way that the American People didn't want. GOP knew that, and that's why they won in 2010. So how come Obama and Democrats won't respect the will of the people and work with the House of Representatives instead of fundamentally opposing them at every step? Two unnecessary wars were the will of the people? Tax cuts for the 1% were the will of the people? Constant rights violations against women are the will of the people? Constant rights violations against gays minding their own farking business are the will of the people? Idiot.......the will of the people will be shown in November, don't worry. Now please, grab your walker and walk back to the nursing home, Grandpa. You're overdue for your Alzheimer's meds. |
||
| BillCo
Wow, another liberal hack writes a craptacular hit piece on the Republicans that gets posted to an online rag. Well, that does it for me. I'm voting for Obama. The Dems only had control of the House and Senate for 2 years of this administration. I can see why it's the Republicans fault. |
||
| mainstreet62
BillCo: Wow, another liberal hack writes a craptacular hit piece on the Republicans that gets posted to an online rag. Well, that does it for me. I'm voting for Obama. The Dems only had control of the House and Senate for 2 years of this administration. I can see why it's the Republicans fault. |
||
| Showing 1-50 of 197 comments | ||
| Refresh | Page 2 | |
| This thread is closed to new comments. |
close