Report This Ad (full site)
Fark.com

Back To Main
   A 13 year old girl couldn't figure out how to take nude pictures of herself to send to her 30 year old "boyfriend". So the mom of the year steps in and helps her technologically dysfunctional child out with the photo shoot

05 May 2012 10:52 AM   |   28084 clicks   |   Deseret News
Add Comment
Showing 1-50 of 170 comments
Refresh Page 2
NowhereMon     
Yes but is the mom hot?

05 May 2012 12:40 AM
Reply
MaudlinMutantMollusk    [TotalFark]  
Hell, if my 13 year old kid was that lame I'd want to get her married off ASAP too

05 May 2012 12:46 AM
Reply
propasaurus    [TotalFark]  
What's this world coming to when a 13 year old can't figure out how to take camera phone pics?

05 May 2012 01:24 AM
Reply
vygramul    [TotalFark]  
They were supposed to take potato pics, but stopped at 3.

05 May 2012 01:37 AM
Reply
zeronewbury    [TotalFark]  
Mormon family values?

05 May 2012 02:50 AM
Reply
AbbeySomeone     
Parental involvement and guidance are important when raising children,

05 May 2012 05:42 AM
Reply
FirstNationalBastard    [TotalFark]  
Everybody needs a hobby.

05 May 2012 07:03 AM
Reply
bentheguard    [TotalFark]  
TTIWWP

05 May 2012 07:09 AM
Reply
dahmers love zombie    [TotalFark]  
NowhereMon: Yes but is the mom hot?

I imagine she's as hot as any other 26-year-old.

05 May 2012 07:21 AM
Reply
Mugato    [TotalFark]  
upload.wikimedia.org

05 May 2012 07:45 AM
Reply
AbbeySomeone     
dahmers love zombie: NowhereMon: Yes but is the mom hot?

I imagine she's as hot as any other 26-year-old.


She's 35 but I see what you did there.

05 May 2012 07:46 AM
Reply
Walker    [TotalFark]  
propasaurus: What's this world coming to when a 13 year old can't figure out how to take camera phone pics?

She seems to be a very stupid girl. Then again it seems to run in the family.

05 May 2012 08:17 AM
Reply
Splish     
So the 13 year old who took and sent the pictures is the victim, and the 30 year old who they were sent to is being investigated? Is that really the law?

05 May 2012 08:41 AM
Reply
Smokey the Bare    [TotalFark]  
Splish: So the 13 year old who took and sent the pictures is the victim, and the 30 year old who they were sent to is being investigated? Is that really the law?

You're joking, right?

05 May 2012 09:06 AM
Reply
GAT_00     
Eh, mother clearly knew about it. That should mean it isn't a crime. If the whole point is to protect the child because they don't know any better, but an adult approved of it, then the reason for the crime is removed.

05 May 2012 09:10 AM
Reply
gameshowhost    [TotalFark]  
bentheguard: TTIWWP

-_o

05 May 2012 09:41 AM
Reply
Splish     
Smokey the Bare: Splish: So the 13 year old who took and sent the pictures is the victim, and the 30 year old who they were sent to is being investigated? Is that really the law?

You're joking, right?


It seems the 13 year old was a willing participant and the instigator in this instance. If they really were "dating" the guy's undeniably a creep and deserves worse than whatever happens to him. I just see a lot of potential for abuse.

13 year old girl: "My stupid stepfather had naked pictures of me on his phone."
Cops: "No, we checked, and there's nothing there."
13 year old girl: "Hold on a second, let me resend them."

05 May 2012 10:10 AM
Reply
Mugato    [TotalFark]  
Splish: Smokey the Bare: Splish: So the 13 year old who took and sent the pictures is the victim, and the 30 year old who they were sent to is being investigated? Is that really the law?

You're joking, right?

It seems the 13 year old was a willing participant and the instigator in this instance. If they really were "dating" the guy's undeniably a creep and deserves worse than whatever happens to him. I just see a lot of potential for abuse.

13 year old girl: "My stupid stepfather had naked pictures of me on his phone."
Cops: "No, we checked, and there's nothing there."
13 year old girl: "Hold on a second, let me resend them."



Yeah, they would in theory have to prove that the guy asked for the photos. Since everyone involved seems to be dumb as shiat, he probably left a text-trail of said request. Of course the defense could argue that his phone was stolen for a short time when the texts were sent.

/either people like this on some level want to get caught or they really are dumb as squirrels

05 May 2012 10:23 AM
Reply
jake3988     
I think the outrage here is the girl being so ridiculously stupid that she can't even take a picture of herself.

05 May 2012 10:54 AM
Reply
rjakobi     
Can't she just photoshop her head onto a picture of a porn star and send that?

05 May 2012 10:55 AM
Reply
pag1107    [TotalFark]  
I think everyone involved should be somehow prevented from breeding ever again, for the good of the species.

05 May 2012 10:57 AM
Reply
BroVinny     
I thought for sure someone would say, "Article is useless without pics," by now.

/you sick Farks

05 May 2012 10:57 AM
Reply
cleveoh     
Mugato: Splish: Smokey the Bare: Splish: So the 13 year old who took and sent the pictures is the victim, and the 30 year old who they were sent to is being investigated? Is that really the law?

You're joking, right?

It seems the 13 year old was a willing participant and the instigator in this instance. If they really were "dating" the guy's undeniably a creep and deserves worse than whatever happens to him. I just see a lot of potential for abuse.

13 year old girl: "My stupid stepfather had naked pictures of me on his phone."
Cops: "No, we checked, and there's nothing there."
13 year old girl: "Hold on a second, let me resend them."


Yeah, they would in theory have to prove that the guy asked for the photos. Since everyone involved seems to be dumb as shiat, he probably left a text-trail of said request. Of course the defense could argue that his phone was stolen for a short time when the texts were sent.

/either people like this on some level want to get caught or they really are dumb as squirrels


I see no reason to insult the Squirrel-American community by lumping them in with these hammerheads.

05 May 2012 10:58 AM
Reply
lowbrowdotorg     
vygramul: They were supposed to take potato pics, but stopped at 3.

I was gonna go with something along the lines of, "That registers 'potato' on the Derp-O-Meter" but yours is better...

05 May 2012 10:59 AM
Reply
lobotomy survivor     
I'm disgusted.

She's even dumber than the camwhores who photograph a mirror to take pics of themselves. You have failed as a partent if you can't teach your kids to use the self timer!

05 May 2012 10:59 AM
Reply
mama's_tasty_foods     
Walker: propasaurus: What's this world coming to when a 13 year old can't figure out how to take camera phone pics?

She seems to be a very stupid girl. Then again it seems to run in the family.


Have you considered the possibility that the "boyfriend" was actually arranged by the mom- ie, she was selling her kid to the guy. Thus the mom pushes to have the pics taken.

Pretty weak of people to beat up on this girl for being "stupid." She seems to have been exploited and betrayed by every adult to come into her life.

05 May 2012 11:00 AM
Reply
dillengest     
Thread is useless without a seat over there.

05 May 2012 11:00 AM
Reply
braedan     
GAT_00: Eh, mother clearly knew about it. That should mean it isn't a crime. If the whole point is to protect the child because they don't know any better, but an adult approved of it, then the reason for the crime is removed.

Not sure if serious...

The crime should be the Mother endangering the welfare of the child, as for the recipient, I don't necessarily think he should go on a list, afterall, the girl may have been lying about her age...but none the less the authorities should have a chat with him...

On the other hand, we're talking about a 13 year old that can't figure out a camera phone, so I really don't mind if she gets raped repeatedly, it's not like we'd be losing anything of value from society....just be sure to kill her afterward so my tax dollars aren't paying for her therapy.

05 May 2012 11:02 AM
Reply
Catlenfell     
"Perfectly normal, perfectly healthy "

05 May 2012 11:02 AM
Reply
lobotomy survivor     
In other news, you have failed if you can't spell "parent."

/corner

05 May 2012 11:02 AM
Reply
6655321     
All the 13 yo girl had to do was to ask a classmate how to use the camera on the cellphone. KIds know how to work them, usually much better than the parents.

05 May 2012 11:03 AM
Reply
tasteless     
GAT_00: Eh, mother clearly knew about it. That should mean it isn't a crime. If the whole point is to protect the child because they don't know any better, but an adult approved of it, then the reason for the crime is removed.

Who cares what a child molester approves of?

05 May 2012 11:05 AM
Reply
bmihura     
Granted this is not proper behavior, but a "felony" for digital pictures, whatever they are?

Nice money grab, United States government.

05 May 2012 11:06 AM
Reply
Slartibartfaster     
Splish: the 30 year old who they were sent to is being investigated

He requested them. so yea.

The mother should be charged with production
The daughter (or whoever hit send) should be charged with distribution.

05 May 2012 11:06 AM
Reply
Degenz     
Hey now, at least she's not porking out babies for foodstamps.

/amidoingitright?

05 May 2012 11:07 AM
Reply
tasteless     
Degenz: Hey now, at least she's not porking out babies for foodstamps.

/amidoingitright?


To be fair the article doesn't say. For all we know she's in section 8 housing with 10 foster kids, on tanf, food stamps, and unemployment. She could have even won the lottery and kept collecting assistance. While whoring out her kid.

05 May 2012 11:11 AM
Reply
Because People in power are Stupid    [TotalFark]  
That guy's mugshot is funny. He looks familiar.

05 May 2012 11:13 AM
Reply
Snarcoleptic_Hoosier    [TotalFark]  
When will these parents learn to set up a webcam and let it be? I'm a professional talent scout for Seventeen and I NEED these pics. And you can trust me on that, since I'm on the internet.

05 May 2012 11:14 AM
Reply
dotSylvia     
Slartibartfaster: Splish: the 30 year old who they were sent to is being investigated

He requested them. so yea.

The mother should be charged with production
The daughter (or whoever hit send) should be charged with distribution.


How on earth would you ask something like this? "Can I have some steamy hot pictures of your thirteen year old please? My preferences include schoolgirl outfits and stockings. Thank you."

05 May 2012 11:15 AM
Reply
Fluorescent Testicle     
vygramul: They were supposed to take potato pics, but stopped at 3.

ar-db.com

What potato cellphone pics might look like.

05 May 2012 11:16 AM
Reply
loki see loki do     
BIE, EIP.

/fark
//welcome to it
///thread useless without pix

05 May 2012 11:17 AM
Reply
Degenz     
tasteless: Degenz: Hey now, at least she's not porking out babies for foodstamps.

/amidoingitright?

To be fair the article doesn't say. For all we know she's in section 8 housing with 10 foster kids, on tanf, food stamps, and unemployment. She could have even won the lottery and kept collecting assistance. While whoring out her kid.


Good point. Do you have her number?

05 May 2012 11:17 AM
Reply
Godamnlimey    [TotalFark]  
According to the article the fine upstanding 30 year old gave the child the cell phone and asked for the photos,I'd say on a dumbness scale they're a match made in heaven

05 May 2012 11:17 AM
Reply
MONSTERTRUCK     
"The mother, a graduate of Breed'em Young University,"

05 May 2012 11:20 AM
Reply
Torgotronic     
I really think that a "Utah" tag needs to be implemented...

05 May 2012 11:21 AM
Reply
T-Servo     
Perhaps it wasn't the photos that confused the girl, but setting up the PayPal account.

"Mom, can I have your credit card? I'm starting a new business."
"Well, you're doing that wrong, and not charging him enough. Plus, you need watermarks on those photos."

05 May 2012 11:22 AM
Reply
offmymeds     
The woman's 13-year-old daughter told Duchesne County sheriff's detectives that her 30-year-old boyfriend from Oregon provided her with a cellphone and requested that she send him naked pictures of herself.

i1136.photobucket.com

05 May 2012 11:22 AM
Reply
tedbundee     
rjakobi: Can't she just photoshop her head onto a picture of a porn star and send that?

She can't operate a point and shoot camera. I seriously doubt she can use a computer.

05 May 2012 11:22 AM
Reply
Snarfangel     
Fluorescent Testicle: vygramul: They were supposed to take potato pics, but stopped at 3.

[ar-db.com image 300x300]

What potato cellphone pics might look like.


That would look *so* hot in a microwave.

05 May 2012 11:25 AM
Reply
indeebud    [TotalFark]  
"The more I know people, the more I love my dog." - Mark Twain

05 May 2012 11:25 AM
Reply
Showing 1-50 of 170 comments
Refresh Page 2
This thread is closed to new comments.


Back To Main

More Headlines:
Main | Sports | Business | Geek | Entertainment | Politics | Video | FarkUs | Contests | Fark Party