Master Splinter knew his stuff. I'm not surprised.

We've got to get to a library!

Nice to see they aren't all fapping to the Lance, JAMA, NEJM, and the PDR.

I used to like him before he sold out

That dude smoked so much oregano.

Slow readers?

/move their lips when reading

//slowly

So Hudson Hawk was based on a true story?

Wow I am amazed that more people have not looked into his writings more closely. Are we that "Superior" that if it wasn't found in the last 50 years it HAS to be quackery?

This just in: Everyone fails at reading comprehension.

/How was that little detail about the valve missing from every textbook for 500 years?

Ok so what I want to know is--where are the cast moldings and glass hearts.. Because honestly that would be freaking awesome to see..

Not surprising that they missed it; even with access to the internet you can still find (recent, like 2010 recent) research papers where people are re-inventing the wheel.

was it on a codex page?

Talk about procrastination.

You're welcome.

Not surprising that we learn anatomy from him. The man dissected more prostitutes than the morgue on CSI Miami.

wait, wouldn't this be called 'olds'?

vudukungfu: Nice to see they aren't all fapping to the Lance, JAMA, NEJM, and the PDR.

You sound like an expert.

GiraffeWaffles: Not surprising that we learn anatomy from him. The man dissected more prostitutes than you'll see on CSI Miami.

Approves

"The Davinci Lode"?

Pretty sure that's already a porno.

/NTTAWWT

It greatly amuses me when I see people purporting to be an "expert" in some field making blanket statements. Attesting to the "fact" that a process or product is safe or not. How the blessed holy process of the "scientific method" is infallible. We should bow to our science lords who know so freaking much and what is good for us. In 50 years the science students of tomorrow will laugh at our ignorance today. Especially the new high holy masters in the field of genetics and gene manipulation.

SweetDickens: It greatly amuses me when I see people purporting to be an "expert" in some field making blanket statements. Attesting to the "fact" that a process or product is safe or not. How the blessed holy process of the "scientific method" is infallible. We should bow to our science lords who know so freaking much and what is good for us. In 50 years the science students of tomorrow will laugh at our ignorance today. Especially the new high holy masters in the field of genetics and gene manipulation.

You sound like an expert, too!