Report This Ad (full site)
Fark.com

Back To Business
   After devastating buyers on the NASDAQ, Facebook considers buying back all shares and going private. Just kidding, they're moving to NY Stock Exchange

24 May 2012 01:10 PM   |   2836 clicks   |   610 WIOD
Add Comment
Showing 1-17 of 17 comments
Refresh
Grapple    [TotalFark]  
Yay! more news coverage!! What's the price down to now? How much does that mean Zuckerberg is (not) worth today?

STFU AND GBTW

24 May 2012 01:14 PM
Reply
syberpud     
Grapple: Yay! more news coverage!! What's the price down to now? How much does that mean Zuckerberg is (not) worth today?

STFU AND GBTW


I think the (older, bitter) business journalists still have some schadenfreude to vent about Zuckerberg.

24 May 2012 01:25 PM
Reply
BizarreMan    [TotalFark]  
No matter how much lipstick you put on the pig, and which fancy restaurant you take it to. It's still a pig.

24 May 2012 01:28 PM
Reply
SharkTrager     
What's interesting is that I wonder what would have happened to the price had NASDAQ not choked on the volume. I believe there would have been a bigger swing one way or the other.

24 May 2012 01:55 PM
Reply
Pick     
Room full of servers worth $100B?????

24 May 2012 02:13 PM
Reply
Fish in a Barrel     
You know... if they did buy back the stock, they'd come out about $30billion ahead, at the moment.

24 May 2012 04:06 PM
Reply
Guelph35     
Fish in a Barrel: You know... if they did buy back the stock, they'd come out about $30billion ahead, at the moment.

lovehateadvertising.com

24 May 2012 04:13 PM
Reply
downstairs    [TotalFark]  
Fish in a Barrel: You know... if they did buy back the stock, they'd come out about $30billion ahead, at the moment.

How so? The stock is lower than its IPO price.

24 May 2012 04:14 PM
Reply
Genju     
downstairs: Fish in a Barrel: You know... if they did buy back the stock, they'd come out about $30billion ahead, at the moment.

How so? The stock is lower than its IPO price.


I think what he's saying is imagine you sell drinks today for $1 each, and you sell 100 of them. Tomorrow, the price of drinks falls to $0.70, and you buy back all 100. You made $100 yesterday but only spent $70 to get it all back. Thus you gained $30 overall.

24 May 2012 04:17 PM
Reply
downstairs    [TotalFark]  
Genju: downstairs: Fish in a Barrel: You know... if they did buy back the stock, they'd come out about $30billion ahead, at the moment.

How so? The stock is lower than its IPO price.

I think what he's saying is imagine you sell drinks today for $1 each, and you sell 100 of them. Tomorrow, the price of drinks falls to $0.70, and you buy back all 100. You made $100 yesterday but only spent $70 to get it all back. Thus you gained $30 overall.


I'm an idiot. Duh. They essentially shorted their own stock.

24 May 2012 04:33 PM
Reply
Jacobin     
This stock will quintuple in value in the next six months as all 900 million members of Facebook who once used google to search for items to buy, will now click on random Facebook ads to search for the things they are looking for, thus starving google of all the ad revenue which formerly made it profitable and driving Facebook ad revenue into the stratosphere.

Correct me if I have misstated the Facebook investors' scenario on stock appreciation

24 May 2012 04:37 PM
Reply
Monkeyfark Ridiculous     
Jacobin: This stock will quintuple in value in the next six months as all 900 million members of Facebook who once used google to search for items to buy, will now click on random Facebook ads to search for the things they are looking for, thus starving google of all the ad revenue which formerly made it profitable and driving Facebook ad revenue into the stratosphere.

Correct me if I have misstated the Facebook investors' scenario on stock appreciation


Well, that 900 million is just number of unique genuine human users they have NOW, it's going to be at 9 billion pretty soon. Which would justify pretty massive growth in the stock price whether they're making a profit or not. I read somewhere that you can't lose money on a company with 900 million users, and with FB we're already talking like a thousand times that many when it gets to 9 billion. So you're right about the relentless ad clicking driving up the stock, but you're setting the bar pretty low when you say 4x the current price.

/plus they have Instagram now, so you have to add another $5-8/share for that

24 May 2012 07:32 PM
Reply
Bacontastesgood     
BizarreMan: No matter how much lipstick you put on the pig, and which fancy restaurant you take it to. It's still a pig.

Really? How about if it sucks your cock? Not a pig anymore, right?

24 May 2012 09:57 PM
Reply
sforce     
Haha but the joke was funnier on Tuesday!:

Link

24 May 2012 10:50 PM
Reply
Fair_Poopsmith     
Bacontastesgood: BizarreMan: No matter how much lipstick you put on the pig, and which fancy restaurant you take it to. It's still a pig.

Really? How about if it sucks your cock? Not a pig anymore, right?


this + your username = gold

25 May 2012 03:12 AM
Reply
The DBS     
Anybody that bought Facebook stock deserved to get screwed. There was ZERO evidence that it was properly priced.

25 May 2012 11:05 AM
Reply
HawkEyes     
Theoretically, if something really bad happened and the stock plummeted, like single digits or something, what would be the impact on Facebook as a service? Is their ability to run the server farms tied directly to stock value? I mean, could a calamitous stock event actually impact their ability to offer Facebook as a website or would it mean that a bunch of people would stop getting rich from doing it?

25 May 2012 07:22 PM
Reply
Showing 1-17 of 17 comments
Refresh
This thread is closed to new comments.


Back To Business

More Headlines:
Main | Sports | Business | Geek | Entertainment | Politics | Video | FarkUs | Contests | Fark Party