Pics or it didn.......

Oh, I see.

Friday saw temperatures soar to the mid-twenties as Britain entered a heat wave.


Odd way to end the story.

FloydA: Friday saw temperatures soar to the mid-twenties as Britain entered a heat wave.


Odd way to end the story.

Makes sense. It was getting hot in there, so they took off all their clothes.

Why oh why oh why would anybody want to film British people having sex?

It's possible that the guy didn't even see the people in the building across the street looking at him. He has the lights on in his room and it looks like it might be a bit dark outside. It's very possible that when he looked at his own window that he saw mostly reflections.

Or it's also possible that he's an exhibitionist.

Either way, it doesn't matter much. We didn't get to see much of the naked girl so this article did not meet my expectations.

FTFA He said that he filmed the pair for twenty minutes and the couple 'didn't care that everyone in my building was staring at them.'

Come on, farkers. Make me proud.

This is shocking! This is so indecent. Have they no shame? I'm so disgusted that I'm going to grab my camera and FILM FOR 20 MINUTES! The things that I will do for, well... me.

WhippingBoy: Why oh why oh why would anybody want to film British people having sex?

WHAR VIDEO WHAR???

Is this really just an article about two random people having sex? The article tries to present it like some kind of crime has been committed, but the only person doing anything wrong seems to be the nosy pervert that filmed the whole thing.

Atomic Spunk: WhippingBoy: Why oh why oh why would anybody want to film British people having sex?

[ucup28.hexat.com image 640x960]

[i1-news.softpedia-static.com image 350x456]

Was it her that was filmed having sex? No. No it wasn't.

Dude with the video cam gets arrested or sued in 3, 2, 1 ...

/If a dude filmed a couple in their home and put in online, what would be his legal lifespan? How about if he filmed a woman changing clothes or using the toilet or perhaps a guy jacking off?
//Lawyers HO!

WhippingBoy: Why oh why oh why would anybody want to film British people having sex?

Judge for yourself. The Sun was there, peeping with a cameraphone from a different angle.

Link

Woman looks like a fat minger, tbh. NSFW though the 'action' is blurred. Humping motions evident.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/v ideo/news/4346408/Lusty-couple-p ut-on-a-show.html#ooid=J4ZGp2NDqDoRWDK OwhUZ2QehLi489yF5

NSFW obviously, but you really can't see too much.

The comments on that site make me glad for the stimulating and civil discourse we take for granted here on Fark.

FTFC:
"I dare him to try to do this in places like Dubai.

- anon, london uk, 31/5/2012 13:02"

Yeah! How dare these two people do something exciting and fun! Assholes should be miserable like everyone is supposed to be. They should have to live in a backwards ass theocracy where you can get killed for performing basic human functions.

An Idiot: WHAR VIDEO WHAR???

Feel free to fap away to British Bonking.

WhippingBoy: Atomic Spunk: WhippingBoy: Why oh why oh why would anybody want to film British people having sex?

[ucup28.hexat.com image 640x960]

[i1-news.softpedia-static.com image 350x456]

Was it her that was filmed having sex? No. No it wasn't.

You said "British people". I showed British people. Do you have a learning disability of some sort?

"A man was stunned when he looked out his flat window on Friday evening and caught a couple brazenly having sex in the building opposite him.

The pair, who have yet to be identified, had not pulled the window blinds in their Nottingham city centre office and were in a full view of residents in the building.

The shocked onlooker, who did not want to be named, filmed the entire encounter."

How does one have brazen sex exactly? Sex is natural and fun. Get over it.

He was so shocked and stunned he couldn't refrain from filming for 20 minutes, and couldn't help but comment on how hot the girl was:

"He said: 'She was really good looking.'"

Yes, let's manufacture some outrage, and then have a look at the hyper-sexualized sidebar for a seasoning of hypocrisy.

Sheriff of Nottingham puts Princess Pooh-Tang under arrest!

Agent Smiths Laugh: Yes, let's manufacture some outrage, and then have a look at the hyper-sexualized sidebar for a seasoning of hypocrisy.

And as though on cue, all the sexy disappeared from the sidebar.

If this weren't a Daily Fail story, I'd tweet it or something.

I almost whacked off.

(deleted: Threadjacking/off-topic)

Oh. I suggested FARK makes money from Mail links. My bad. I'm now 100% certain this isn't the case.

HotIgneous Intruder: Dude with the video cam gets arrested or sued in 3, 2, 1 ...

/If a dude filmed a couple in their home and put in online, what would be his legal lifespan? How about if he filmed a woman changing clothes or using the toilet or perhaps a guy jacking off?
//Lawyers HO!

I'm guessing that there might be a difference between someone filming your home or changing room, where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy, and filming a brightly lit office without window coverings, especially if you are farking in front of said uncovered window. We need a legal type person to explain.

Atomic Spunk: WhippingBoy: Atomic Spunk: WhippingBoy: Why oh why oh why would anybody want to film British people having sex?

[ucup28.hexat.com image 640x960]

[i1-news.softpedia-static.com image 350x456]

Was it her that was filmed having sex? No. No it wasn't.

You said "British people". I showed British people. Do you have a learning disability of some sort?

To be fair, you showed British rarities.

Nothing says that is patently absurd like deleting a post which asks a question.

She looks like a manatee, judging from the size of her ass

WhippingBoy: Why oh why oh why would anybody want to film British people having sex?

No idea...

imprimere: To be fair, you showed British rarities.

They appear to have all of their teeth.

A man was stunned when he looked out his flat window on Friday evening and caught a couple brazenly having sex in the building opposite him.

I bet he needed the video because he couldn't fap to the live event due to sheer disgust.

"Oh. I suggested FARK makes money from Mail links. My bad. I'm now 100% certain this isn't the case."

That'd be unpossible. Especially judging by the frequency of Mail links.

You yanks sure think a lot of your fat asses.

Spiralmonkey: HotIgneous Intruder: Dude with the video cam gets arrested or sued in 3, 2, 1 ...

/If a dude filmed a couple in their home and put in online, what would be his legal lifespan? How about if he filmed a woman changing clothes or using the toilet or perhaps a guy jacking off?
//Lawyers HO!

I'm guessing that there might be a difference between someone filming your home or changing room, where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy, and filming a brightly lit office without window coverings, especially if you are farking in front of said uncovered window. We need a legal type person to explain.


It's in Britain. The legal term is called 'Peeping Tom'. We invented it, so we can do it as much as we want.

Come to the UK and we can watch you shag; it's our right.

"Do you know the couple? If so contact our newsdesk on 0203 615 1937"


Waiting for the call now.

Burchill: Nothing says that is patently absurd like deleting a post which asks a question.

Join the TFD circlejerk for 5 bucks a month. You'll be untouchable.

Pert: WhippingBoy: Why oh why oh why would anybody want to film British people having sex?

No idea...

[2.bp.blogspot.com image 640x480]

I would have tea and crumpets with that.

GungFu: Come to the UK and we can watch you shag; it's our right.

So it seems.

Is that office a public space? It seems to me to be the office space of a private firm, but I may be wrong.

GungFu: Spiralmonkey: HotIgneous Intruder: Dude with the video cam gets arrested or sued in 3, 2, 1 ...

/If a dude filmed a couple in their home and put in online, what would be his legal lifespan? How about if he filmed a woman changing clothes or using the toilet or perhaps a guy jacking off?
//Lawyers HO!

I'm guessing that there might be a difference between someone filming your home or changing room, where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy, and filming a brightly lit office without window coverings, especially if you are farking in front of said uncovered window. We need a legal type person to explain.


It's in Britain. The legal term is called 'Peeping Tom'. We invented it, so we can do it as much as we want.

Come to the UK and we can watch you shag; it's our right.

I'm in Edinburgh and if you think you can watch me shag you'll be fecking lucky - my husband has been working all day and can't raise smile at the moment.

Thirty minutes, damn he beat me by 27 1/2 minutes.

GungFu: Spiralmonkey: HotIgneous Intruder: Dude with the video cam gets arrested or sued in 3, 2, 1 ...

/If a dude filmed a couple in their home and put in online, what would be his legal lifespan? How about if he filmed a woman changing clothes or using the toilet or perhaps a guy jacking off?
//Lawyers HO!

I'm guessing that there might be a difference between someone filming your home or changing room, where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy, and filming a brightly lit office without window coverings, especially if you are farking in front of said uncovered window. We need a legal type person to explain.


It's in Britain. The legal term is called 'Peeping Tom'. We invented it, so we can do it as much as we want.

Come to the UK and we can watch you shag; it's our right.

And better than anything you put on the telly!

Atomic Spunk: You said "British people". I showed British people. Do you have a learning disability of some sort?

You showed an outlier.

That's no manatee, that's Catherine Zeta-Jones!

/And still hawter than hawt.

WhippingBoy: Atomic Spunk: You said "British people". I showed British people. Do you have a learning disability of some sort?

You showed an outlier.

And People of Walmart is fictional?

Burchill: (deleted: Threadjacking/off-topic)

Oh. I suggested FARK makes money from Mail links. My bad. I'm now 100% certain this isn't the case.

Oh look, a genius figured out this site is a profit scheme.

danielscissorhands: Pert: WhippingBoy: Why oh why oh why would anybody want to film British people having sex?

No idea...

[2.bp.blogspot.com image 640x480]

I would have tea and crumpets with that.

I'd spill my tea on those crumpets...

Spiralmonkey: WhippingBoy: Atomic Spunk: You said "British people". I showed British people. Do you have a learning disability of some sort?

You showed an outlier.

And People of Walmart is fictional?

They were at a Walmart?

/I'm so confused

British chics are HOT.
So Where's the Farking video???

Spiralmonkey: GungFu: Spiralmonkey: HotIgneous Intruder: Dude with the video cam gets arrested or sued in 3, 2, 1 ...

/If a dude filmed a couple in their home and put in online, what would be his legal lifespan? How about if he filmed a woman changing clothes or using the toilet or perhaps a guy jacking off?
//Lawyers HO!

I'm guessing that there might be a difference between someone filming your home or changing room, where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy, and filming a brightly lit office without window coverings, especially if you are farking in front of said uncovered window. We need a legal type person to explain.


It's in Britain. The legal term is called 'Peeping Tom'. We invented it, so we can do it as much as we want.

Come to the UK and we can watch you shag; it's our right.

I'm in Edinburgh and if you think you can watch me shag you'll be fecking lucky - my husband has been working all day and can't raise smile at the moment.

How quaint - a husband for shagging! That's so 1950s.

I think that people in this country are just to conservative sexually.

I did this once in a hotel in Chicago. Just opened the windows and had at it. When we were done, there were people applauding, so we bowed. It was awesome.

GungFu: How quaint - a husband for shagging! That's so 1950s.

Well, it is Edinborough after all.
Cut horny sister a break.