Now the guy in front's shot will be all blurry due to his surprise and sudden movement, and Grabby McGooser will be able to sell his shots to the AP and Reuters, because his where better.

/the free market at work

Looks like that one photographer is getting his economy boosted, if you know what I mean.

That's hilarious

what am I supposed to be seeing?

I bet he's got a bull market in his pants.

Duck...

Duck...

GOOSE!

sweetmelissa31: I bet he's got a bull market in his pants.

I bet he totally has a boner

toddalmighty: what am I supposed to be seeing?

it's.... it's farking circled

That crush of cameramen in front of you has to be really distracting if you're at the table trying to give your report.

It can't be what everyone thinks, or else we'd have a followup photo of the epic fistfight between the two photogs.

Hey Ted, you been working out?

Gyrfalcon: It can't be what everyone thinks, or else we'd have a followup photo of the epic fistfight between the two photogs.

More than likely, it's just the photog in the back letting the guy know that he needs the dude in front to move over a few inches. These people aren't like bitter rivals, and they are all in the same business, so it's not hard to assume that when they are packed like sardines, they understand that they might be in someone's way.

It's a funny pic, but I think it's something like that...

Was he just balancing? Moving the guy out of the way? Flirting? Picking his pocket? Press pool shenanigans?

I MUST KNOW.

He could have tapped the guy in front on the shoulder if he wanted him to move over a bit. This was... a more special tap. A sort of "say what are you doing after this?" kind of tap.

Mikey1969: Gyrfalcon: It can't be what everyone thinks, or else we'd have a followup photo of the epic fistfight between the two photogs.

More than likely, it's just the photog in the back letting the guy know that he needs the dude in front to move over a few inches. These people aren't like bitter rivals, and they are all in the same business, so it's not hard to assume that when they are packed like sardines, they understand that they might be in someone's way.

It's a funny pic, but I think it's something like that...

Sounds semi-reasonable, but I'm not seeing it. Wouldn't that be conveyed with a tap on the shoulder or hip or side or something? I mean you could say he just missed, but he's clearly got an ass grabbing hand position there, vertical, not horizontal.

Probably just farking with someone I assume he works with a lot.

Famous DC, if you want to read something idiotic about politics without resorting to a right wing editorial.

Headso: Famous DC, if you want to read something idiotic about politics without resorting to a right wing editorial.

Uhm, it's just a funny picture, there's not even any text with it.

ggggggggaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

He's working to extend the short leg of his tripod.

The true outrage is the guy on the far side of the same row using his gd cell phone as a camera. "Look ma, I be a real fauxtographer with my iphone."

Can't a guy just squeeze a little ass every now and then?

"I'm just going to hold right here to help balance myself for the shot. ....No homo."

/NTTAWWT

Winktologist: Now the guy in front's shot will be all blurry due to his surprise and sudden movement, and Grabby McGooser will be able to sell his shots to the AP and Reuters, because his where better.

/the free market at work

The not-so-invisible hand of the market.

/am I right?

He can tell from his pantsh he's toight. Toight like toiger!

Abner Doon: Sounds semi-reasonable, but I'm not seeing it. Wouldn't that be conveyed with a tap on the shoulder or hip or side or something? I mean you could say he just missed, but he's clearly got an ass grabbing hand position there, vertical, not horizontal.

Hip would probably be more reasonable, but the picture makes it hard to tell if he's actually touching the guy or if he's moving his hand into place. I imagine you don't tap the guy on the should because you could fark with his shot.

So Bernanke isn't doing the pick pocketing? pocket picking? MMMM, delicious hot pockets picking. I hereby call for the dissolution of the Federal Reserve System and declare RON PAUL to be RON PAUL!!



amijewingitrite? amidoingitreich?

no hot pockets in the ovens during my watch

*came across the above pic on a weird Pro-Paul blog. But not sure if I'm supposed to be the most pissed off at the Jews, the Catholics, The Illuminati, The Enlightenment, Freemasonry or The Fed.

He was just being a good sport.

IrateShadow: Abner Doon: Sounds semi-reasonable, but I'm not seeing it. Wouldn't that be conveyed with a tap on the shoulder or hip or side or something? I mean you could say he just missed, but he's clearly got an ass grabbing hand position there, vertical, not horizontal.

Hip would probably be more reasonable, but the picture makes it hard to tell if he's actually touching the guy or if he's moving his hand into place. I imagine you don't tap the guy on the should because you could fark with his shot.

If a tap on the shoulder could foul his shot, a goose to the ass sure ain't gonna be much better. Vaguely plausible though.

/ And now I've done enough thinking, for the day, about two guys playing grab-ass

I did this kind of work for several years, but I cannot explain this pic.

Winktologist
Grabby McGooser will be able to sell his shots to the AP and Reuters, because his were better.

Mr. McGooser already has an employer or he would not be there. And you'd better choose between AP 'or' Reuters or you won't be working for either of them. My first thought was that he was nudging him out of the way or he was loosing his balance. Poke a photographer in the arm he's holding the lens with and you'd be asking for trouble.

Dear Jerk: I did this kind of work for several years, but I cannot explain this pic.

Winktologist
Grabby McGooser will be able to sell his shots to the AP and Reuters, because his were better.

Mr. McGooser already has an employer or he would not be there. And you'd better choose between AP 'or' Reuters or you won't be working for either of them. My first thought was that he was nudging him out of the way or he was loosing his balance. Poke a photographer in the arm he's holding the lens with and you'd be asking for trouble.

And they both appear to be shooting Canon, too, so it's not even a case of 'hey, fark you Nikon-boy'.

/Canon shooter
//gets along perfectly well with Nikon shooters
///fun to play the rivalry in group shoots though

What is that a 70-200/300L? Come on, you don't need to even be that close, especially with IS.

Abner Doon: Mikey1969: Gyrfalcon: It can't be what everyone thinks, or else we'd have a followup photo of the epic fistfight between the two photogs.

More than likely, it's just the photog in the back letting the guy know that he needs the dude in front to move over a few inches. These people aren't like bitter rivals, and they are all in the same business, so it's not hard to assume that when they are packed like sardines, they understand that they might be in someone's way.

It's a funny pic, but I think it's something like that...

Sounds semi-reasonable, but I'm not seeing it. Wouldn't that be conveyed with a tap on the shoulder or hip or side or something? I mean you could say he just missed, but he's clearly got an ass grabbing hand position there, vertical, not horizontal.

Probably just farking with someone I assume he works with a lot.

He may also be physically moving the dude. Look how weird the guy in front is sitting, possibly someone on other side so he doesn't fall over, and this guy holding him so he doesn't sway back in everybody's way. I worked for a very crappy TV station for a year and a half, and sometimes people physically move you so you can concentrate on the camera, also a lower angle keeps them form knocking the camera around, and allows you to better control any movement that happens.

soaboutthat: The true outrage is the guy on the far side of the same row using his gd cell phone as a camera. "Look ma, I be a real fauxtographer with my iphone."

Yeah, that pisses me off, too. Your camera is only as good as the lens attached, and no matter how many skydiving-photo-shoot commercials you see on TV, a cell phone lens will never equal a real lens.

Jackson Herring: Looks like that one photographer is getting his economy boosted, if you know what I mean.

And I think you do.
Someone had to finish that.

More proof of the anti-marriage, liberal-media agenda.

bob_ross: What is that a 70-200/300L? Come on, you don't need to even be that close, especially with IS.

You obviously know cameras, so you know that guys like this just like to sport their glass around. You could get that shot with an iPhone, but then what's the point of spending $3K on a lens?

/heh heh ... "sporting glass"

Mikey1969: soaboutthat: The true outrage is the guy on the far side of the same row using his gd cell phone as a camera. "Look ma, I be a real fauxtographer with my iphone."

Yeah, that pisses me off, too. Your camera is only as good as the lens attached, and no matter how many skydiving-photo-shoot commercials you see on TV, a cell phone lens will never equal a real lens.

No Instagram on an SLR. Now don't you feel silly?

Rug Doctor: bob_ross: What is that a 70-200/300L? Come on, you don't need to even be that close, especially with IS.

You obviously know cameras, so you know that guys like this just like to sport their glass around. You could get that shot with an iPhone, but then what's the point of spending $3K on a lens?

/heh heh ... "sporting glass"

LOL

"Hey Bro, nice glass you're sporting" ha!

Fish in a Barrel: Mikey1969: soaboutthat: The true outrage is the guy on the far side of the same row using his gd cell phone as a camera. "Look ma, I be a real fauxtographer with my iphone."

Yeah, that pisses me off, too. Your camera is only as good as the lens attached, and no matter how many skydiving-photo-shoot commercials you see on TV, a cell phone lens will never equal a real lens.

No Instagram on an SLR. Now don't you feel silly?

Yeah, I guess you have a point.... I'd have to (shudder) pull it off the SD card to upload it. How 2010...

:-)

Mikey1969: Abner Doon: Mikey1969: Gyrfalcon: It can't be what everyone thinks, or else we'd have a followup photo of the epic fistfight between the two photogs.

More than likely, it's just the photog in the back letting the guy know that he needs the dude in front to move over a few inches. These people aren't like bitter rivals, and they are all in the same business, so it's not hard to assume that when they are packed like sardines, they understand that they might be in someone's way.

It's a funny pic, but I think it's something like that...

Sounds semi-reasonable, but I'm not seeing it. Wouldn't that be conveyed with a tap on the shoulder or hip or side or something? I mean you could say he just missed, but he's clearly got an ass grabbing hand position there, vertical, not horizontal.

Probably just farking with someone I assume he works with a lot.

He may also be physically moving the dude. Look how weird the guy in front is sitting, possibly someone on other side so he doesn't fall over, and this guy holding him so he doesn't sway back in everybody's way. I worked for a very crappy TV station for a year and a half, and sometimes people physically move you so you can concentrate on the camera, also a lower angle keeps them form knocking the camera around, and allows you to better control any movement that happens.

Hmm, well that would make sense now that you put it that way.

Abner Doon: IrateShadow: Abner Doon: Sounds semi-reasonable, but I'm not seeing it. Wouldn't that be conveyed with a tap on the shoulder or hip or side or something? I mean you could say he just missed, but he's clearly got an ass grabbing hand position there, vertical, not horizontal.

Hip would probably be more reasonable, but the picture makes it hard to tell if he's actually touching the guy or if he's moving his hand into place. I imagine you don't tap the guy on the should because you could fark with his shot.

If a tap on the shoulder could foul his shot, a goose to the ass sure ain't gonna be much better. Vaguely plausible though.

/ And now I've done enough thinking, for the day, about two guys playing grab-ass

So you do SOME thinking each day about guys playing grab-ass. NTTAWWT.

Any other photographers amussed that a few of them are are using a 70-200MM lense to shot a subject 4 feet away?

I bet they all have their camera set at "P" for "Professional" too.

Abner Doon: Mikey1969: Abner Doon: Mikey1969: Gyrfalcon: It can't be what everyone thinks, or else we'd have a followup photo of the epic fistfight between the two photogs.

More than likely, it's just the photog in the back letting the guy know that he needs the dude in front to move over a few inches. These people aren't like bitter rivals, and they are all in the same business, so it's not hard to assume that when they are packed like sardines, they understand that they might be in someone's way.

It's a funny pic, but I think it's something like that...

Sounds semi-reasonable, but I'm not seeing it. Wouldn't that be conveyed with a tap on the shoulder or hip or side or something? I mean you could say he just missed, but he's clearly got an ass grabbing hand position there, vertical, not horizontal.

Probably just farking with someone I assume he works with a lot.

He may also be physically moving the dude. Look how weird the guy in front is sitting, possibly someone on other side so he doesn't fall over, and this guy holding him so he doesn't sway back in everybody's way. I worked for a very crappy TV station for a year and a half, and sometimes people physically move you so you can concentrate on the camera, also a lower angle keeps them form knocking the camera around, and allows you to better control any movement that happens.

Hmm, well that would make sense now that you put it that way.

Great, now someone is accusing me of making sense? And on Fark, no less... What will the neighbors say? B-)

blastoh: Any other photographers amussed that a few of them are are using a 70-200MM lense to shot a subject 4 feet away?

I bet they all have their camera set at "P" for "Professional" too.

It's called a 'walking around lens', dick ;)

/Seriously though, these aren't studio photographers, they don't want to be caught stuck with a 50mm prime on when the VP rides by on a zebra.

Mikey1969: Fish in a Barrel: Mikey1969: soaboutthat: The true outrage is the guy on the far side of the same row using his gd cell phone as a camera. "Look ma, I be a real fauxtographer with my iphone."

Yeah, that pisses me off, too. Your camera is only as good as the lens attached, and no matter how many skydiving-photo-shoot commercials you see on TV, a cell phone lens will never equal a real lens.

No Instagram on an SLR. Now don't you feel silly?

Yeah, I guess you have a point.... I'd have to (shudder) pull it off the SD card to upload it. How 2010...

:-)

Or you could just do what my 2007 camera allowed me to do and just directly DL from the card by plugging it in to my PC.

Abner Doon: Headso: Famous DC, if you want to read something idiotic about politics without resorting to a right wing editorial.

Uhm, it's just a funny picture, there's not even any text with it.

Proof perfect that liberals on this site are farking whiny biatches. Seriously. If you want an echo chamber go elsewhere, this had nothing to do with politics. Not even sure why it's in the politics thread.

actualhuman: /Seriously though, these aren't studio photographers, they don't want to be caught stuck with a 50mm prime on when the VP rides by on a zebra.

You will never both take a more sharp picture, while looking completely rediculous to the average person while doing it, than when you have that nnifty fity on your Pro SLR.

and it is no long called a "walking around lense" it is the "proof Im a professional" lense.