Bubba_the_Hutt: palelizard: umad: HER ARMPIT LOOKS LIKE IT IS REALLY THE OTHER CHICK'S BUTT.

mbillips: If you unfocus your eyes, you might see her armpit/shoulder as a small, deformed, hairy butt on the blonde. That's the best I could come up with.

Oh. Still don't see it, but thanks.

Two girls in the picture. Girl in the foreground is pointing at the camera and her armpit looks like the background girl's butt.

Except that no matter how much I want it to, it just doesn't. And I'm as perverted as they...get.

Now the one with the woman taking the photograph, THAT one looks like butt.

These pictures are hoolarious. Please post more. So far THISISYOURBRAINONFARK is the best.

I loved this part:

"THAT THE YOUNG LADY THOUGHT ABOUT MAKING THIS LASTING IMPRESSION VAGINA FIRST"

fatcurlytoes: I... I just don't see how the pic is ambiguous? Did the program have a waxed vadge on it or something? What else could we be looking at?

Yeah, I don't know what else it could be, either. In all of the other "trick" pictures, you can eventually see the armpit or thumb. Not in this one.

TallyGirl: I loved this part:

"THAT THE YOUNG LADY THOUGHT ABOUT MAKING THIS LASTING IMPRESSION VAGINA FIRST"

You know, there are kits available for this very purpose. They can usually be found in adult novelty stores.

RminusQ: SOME OF THESE ARTICLES CONTAINED STATEMENTS TO THE EFFECT THAT THE YOUNG LADY STOOD AND LIFTED HER GOWN WAIST HIGH AND INTENTIONALLY EXPOSED HER BARE GENITALS AND PRIVATE PARTS IN ORDER TO MAKE A LASTING IMPRESSION AND LEGACY AT HER ALMA MATER; THAT THE YOUNG LADY THOUGHT ABOUT MAKING THIS LASTING IMPRESSION VAGINA FIRST

Did they actually use that latter expression in a prior article? Because jesus farking christ, I wouldn't expect any news source short of the goddamn Onion to use that phrase.



I wave my private parts at your aunties, you brightly-colored, mealy-templed, cranberry-smelling, electric donkey-bottom biters.

THE YOUNG LADY IS DEFINITELY SITTING AND HOLDING A PROGRAM, BUT THE POSITION OF HER LEGS MAKES IT LOOK LIKE SHE'S GOING COMMANDO. I'M SURPRISED SOMEONE ON THE YEARBOOK STAFF DIDN'T NOTICE THIS AND CROP THE PHOTO BEFORE PUBLICATION.

/OR MAYBE THEY DID AND WANTED TO MAKE A LASTING IMPRESSION VAGINA FIRST

WTF? I CAN'T BELIEVE A PAPER USED THOSE CLASSLESS PHRASES IN PUBLISHES SEVERAL ARTICLES ABOUT THE INCIDENT AND MOREOVER, APPARENTLY HADN'T EVEN SEEN THE PHOTO IN QUESTION.

Has anyone pointed out the capslock yet? If not, please do so.

What are the call letters of this tv station? Oh yeah...

WSUC

/Good credibility there, Lou.

lennavan: WE DEEPLY REGRET THESE ERRORS, HAVE REMOVED THE FORMER POSTED ARTICLES AND COMPLETELY RETRACT AND CORRECT THEM. WE OPENLY AND FULLY APOLOGIZE TO THE YOUNG LADY SHOWN IN THE PHOTOGRAPH AND TO OUR READERS FOR THESE ERRORS AND ANY EMBARRASSMENT OR DISCOMFORT THEY MAY HAVE CAUSED.

Wow, I gotta say it would be nice if more news sources corrected their stories in this manner. Remove the former incorrect article, correct it and apologize.

easy, all you have to do is file a screamingly large lawsuit that their laywers tell them they are going to lose handily, then watch them scramble to try to mitigate the damages awarded.

/that retraction WAS NOT journalistic integrity, that was pants-shiatting terror in damage control mode.

LOUD NOISES!!!

/I love lamp.

THE REAL CRIME HERE IS THAT A YEARBOOK IS $100.

LOUD NOISES

/i love lamp

Your Boss: LOUD NOISES!!!

/I love lamp.

Missed it by THAT much!

DATA

THERE IS NP W/BEING A CYBORG.
THERE IS NP W/BEING A CYBORG.
THERE IS NP W/BEING A CYBORG.
THERE IS NP W/BEING A CYBORG.

END-OF-DATA

YOU SEE ?!

Giggety!

highendmighty: Hmmm. Not only do I read that as a scream in my head, but also as a robot. Anyone else get the robot effect?

Like a Dalek?

If only there were some kind of skill, or tool - possibly computerized - which could have circumvented this graphic problem!!!

Mugato

POCKET NINJA BEAT ME TO IT.

Pocket Ninja will always beat you to it. It is the order of the universe.

fatcurlytoes: I... I just don't see how the pic is ambiguous? Did the program have a waxed vadge on it or something? What else could we be looking at?

My guess: Someone on the yearbook staff who doesn't like her pasted a clipping of a vag from playboy over her fully clothed picture to make it look like she's a whore. The news channel is probably getting sued by the family of the girl depicted.

Seems like something high-schoolers would do out of boredom.

bhcompy: Diogenes: I SWEAR, I'VE GOT TO DO EVERYTHING AROUND HERE. (NSFW IF LEGIT)

It's a streetlight..... or a shaved vagoo

what a bald vagoo might look like

^{what's? Magoo? oh my bad.}

What a a girl showing her hoo-ha in a high school yearbook may look like"


Do an image search for the uncensored cover

slackers

XplodedSynapses: highendmighty: Hmmm. Not only do I read that as a scream in my head, but also as a robot. Anyone else get the robot effect?

Like a Dalek?

Yeah, with Broca's aphasia.

EX...TERM...INATE!

fatcurlytoes: I... I just don't see how the pic is ambiguous? Did the program have a waxed vadge on it or something? What else could we be looking at?

to be serious for a moment, I think it's accidental exposure but she is wearing pantyhose and they are not seeing what they wish they were seeing.

No one yet? Really?

THAT KEY WASN'T BROKEN, IT WAS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL!

Diogenes: I SWEAR, I'VE GOT TO DO EVERYTHING AROUND HERE. (NSFW IF LEGIT)

THAT'S NOT WHAT THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT. IT'S ABOUT A RACY YEARBOOK PHOTO, WHICH YOU CAN SEE HERE. [SFW] THE ARTICLE IS CONFUSING, BECAUSE IT MENTIONS THE YEARBOOK PHOTO AND THE GRADUATION PEEP SHOW. HOWEVER, YOU CAN SEE THAT THESE ARE TWO DIFFERENT GIRLS.

SORRY WSOCTV, BUT EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT THE APOLOGY DOESN'T COUNT UNLESS IT'S IN UPPER CASED LETTERS AND COMIC SANS.

THE ARTICLE SAID SHE SHOWED HER TAINT.

skrame: Diogenes: I SWEAR, I'VE GOT TO DO EVERYTHING AROUND HERE. (NSFW IF LEGIT)

THAT'S NOT WHAT THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT. IT'S ABOUT A RACY YEARBOOK PHOTO, WHICH YOU CAN SEE HERE. [SFW] THE ARTICLE IS CONFUSING, BECAUSE IT MENTIONS THE YEARBOOK PHOTO AND THE GRADUATION PEEP SHOW. HOWEVER, YOU CAN SEE THAT THESE ARE TWO DIFFERENT GIRLS.

I'm pretty sure you've got some stories mixed up. The story here is about Lake Norman HS is from North Carolina. The pic you linked is a girl from Colorado (my HS, as a matter of fact). I'm pretty certain that the entire article is about the NC school/girl.

WOULD YOU ALL SPEAK UP, I CAN'THEAR YOU, I FORGOT MY READING GLASSES

Muta: THEY SHOULD HAVE PRINTED THE NAME OF THE PARENT WHO COMPLAINED.

THEN CHARGED THAT PERVERT WITH BEING A SEXUAL PREDATOR FOR STARING AT A YOUNG GIRL'S HOOHAH

Smeggy Smurf: Muta: THEY SHOULD HAVE PRINTED THE NAME OF THE PARENT WHO COMPLAINED.

THEN CHARGED THAT PERVERT WITH BEING A SEXUAL PREDATOR FOR STARING AT A YOUNG GIRL'S HOOHAH

wHAT YOUNG GIRL? sHE'S IN hIGH sCHOOL.

turns out that girl wasn't trying to show off her hoo-ha


I thought it was a Cooter

IANAL but in the little glancing i have done at legal documents, they're rife with capitaleese like this. Thus, the capslock is what gives this article a stink of court-orderedness, or at least, the paper's lawyers not reporters wrote that one.

evilmousse: IANAL but in the little glancing i have done at legal documents, they're rife with capitaleese like this. Thus, the capslock is what gives this article a stink of court-orderedness, or at least, the paper's lawyers not reporters wrote that one.

Best acronym ever.

LOOKS LIKE SOMEONE IS GOING TO HAVE HER 4 YEARS OF COLLEGE PAID FOR.

who's the guy over her right shoulder talking to on his cell phone I wonder.

FINALLY, AN ARTICLE I WISH ACTUALLY HAD COMMENTS ENABLED

The lulz would be epic.

Lt. Cheese Weasel: [img96.imageshack.us image 587x448]

Dude, that's just wrong. Worse than Luke recovering in the Hoth medical room wrong.

Just a pair of SICK JOKER LIPS!

Standard Deviant: fatcurlytoes: I... I just don't see how the pic is ambiguous? Did the program have a waxed vadge on it or something? What else could we be looking at?

Yeah, I don't know what else it could be, either. In all of the other "trick" pictures, you can eventually see the armpit or thumb. Not in this one.

It's just not that clear. Could be her vulva, could be her chubby thighs pressed together... heck, it could be that the yearbook photo editor got shot down by her once when he asked her out, saw her flashing a little leg in the photo, and decided to get a little P-shopped revenge. Bad luck that she happened to be looking at the camera and smiling. After seeing the acres of bad judgment displayed on Is Anyone Up? during its short, bathroom-mirror-picture-adorned life, this ain't a thing. Who really gives a shiat about yearbooks, anyway? I'm always meaning to burn mine after going back and seeing some of the crap that my friends wrote in it, lest I become involved in certain criminal matters and the cops find it and read some of their "dedications".

After a long discussion with our lawyers & a broken capslock key, turns out that girl wasn't trying to show off her hoo-ha in the high school yearbook after all. Friends?

I'm still trying to figure out how and why they had a long discussion with a broken capslock key.

/surprised it got to 97 entries without someone mentioning that
//no I'm not - headline says hoo-ha. That trumps bad grammar
//female - don't give a dang about her hoo-ha

i HAVE SEEN THE PIC I HAVE LOOKED AT IT AND STUDIED WHERE HER EYES ARE LOOKING AND HOW SHE IS HOLDING THAT OBJECT. SHE IS DOING WHAT WE ALL THINK SHE IS DOING AND i HAVE NO QUESTION IN MY MIND. I THINK SHE MIGHT HAVE BEEN DOING IT FOR THE GUY OR GIRL TAKING THE YEARBOOK PICTURES AND NOT FOR THE OTHER PEOPLE WHO WERE THERE.