Report This Ad (full site)
Fark.com

Back To Geek
   Neil DeGrasse Tyson explains the "science" of summer science fiction movies

15 Jun 2012 12:18 PM   |   4025 clicks   |   NPR
Add Comment
Showing 1-50 of 55 comments
Refresh Page 2
hubiestubert    [TotalFark]  
To be fair, Thor IS magic as is the Uru hammer...

15 Jun 2012 09:54 AM
Reply
Angry Drunk Bureaucrat    [TotalFark]  
Oh, Neil DeGrasse Tyson was the unnamed astrophysicist that Morning Edition was advertising "in the next hour". If I had known that I would have left the radio on when I got in to work.

Geez NPR, go ahead and name drop forchrissakes; we're not idiots. We know who NDGT is.

15 Jun 2012 10:00 AM
Reply
Diogenes    [TotalFark]  
hubiestubert: To be fair, Thor IS magic as is the Uru hammer...

Nuh-uh. It's Asgardian technology.

15 Jun 2012 10:11 AM
Reply
DjangoStonereaver    [TotalFark]  
Angry Drunk Bureaucrat: Oh, Neil DeGrasse Tyson was the unnamed astrophysicist that Morning Edition was advertising "in the next hour". If I had known that I would have left the radio on when I got in to work.

Geez NPR, go ahead and name drop forchrissakes; we're not idiots. We know who NDGT is.


If only there were some way for you to go back and hear the story you missed.

15 Jun 2012 11:17 AM
Reply
gilgigamesh    [TotalFark]  
There were actually three inconsistencies in Prometheus relating to their distance from Earth.

1. Introductory scroll gives a distance of approximately 35 light years, which is basically "down the street" in our galactic neighborhood;

2. Charlize Theron states we are out "half a billion miles" which is still within our solar system,

3. Logan Marshall-Green, the guy archaeologist, states that the combination of stars found in the various ancient depictions were too far away to be seen by their artists; in fact a combination of 5 stars only 35 light years away is practically right on top of us and should be readily visible to the naked eye.

My only real criticism of the movie. I know its fantasy, but I hate when my sci fi gets sloppy about the basics.

15 Jun 2012 11:32 AM
Reply
hubiestubert    [TotalFark]  
gilgigamesh: There were actually three inconsistencies in Prometheus relating to their distance from Earth.

1. Introductory scroll gives a distance of approximately 35 light years, which is basically "down the street" in our galactic neighborhood;

2. Charlize Theron states we are out "half a billion miles" which is still within our solar system,

3. Logan Marshall-Green, the guy archaeologist, states that the combination of stars found in the various ancient depictions were too far away to be seen by their artists; in fact a combination of 5 stars only 35 light years away is practically right on top of us and should be readily visible to the naked eye.

My only real criticism of the movie. I know its fantasy, but I hate when my sci fi gets sloppy about the basics.


I was just annoyed by the lack of simple procedural details. No base camp. No airlocks. Isolation lab is only accessible from within the ship, but can be jettisoned? Who the heck does an archeological dig out of a truck? No habitat support on site in a toxic atmosphere? Setting a ship the size of a capitol building, with no aerodynamics to speak of, and your only way home, down the gravity well? With the head of the company inside? Physical security for the whole ship is essentially dropping a ramp down like a pick up? Who the Hells decided "Let's do an archeological dig on a planet with huge storms, and let's not set up any emergency procedures except for RUN HARDER!"? How the heck were they supposed to even identify what might be hazardous if the only lab facilities were in the ship? No holding area, no identification procedures, no staging of supplies on site? First year Geology students could set up a better dig...

15 Jun 2012 11:44 AM
Reply
BKITU    [TotalFark]  
gilgigamesh: My only real criticism of the movie. I know its fantasy, but I hate when my sci fi gets sloppy about the basics.

Sci-Fi Writers Have No Sense of Scale

/sorry for ruining your life

15 Jun 2012 11:56 AM
Reply
gilgigamesh    [TotalFark]  
hubiestubert:
I was just annoyed by the lack of simple procedural details. No base camp. No airlocks. Isolation lab is only accessible from within the ship, but can be jettisoned? Who the heck does an archeological dig out of a truck? No habitat support on site in a toxic atmosphere? Setting a ship the size of a capitol building, with no aerodynamics to speak of, and your only way home, down the gravity well? With the head of the company inside? Physical security for the whole ship is essentially dropping a ramp down like a pick up? Who the Hells decided "Let's do an archeological dig on a planet with huge storms, and let's not set up any emergency procedures except for RUN HARDER!"? How the heck were they supposed to even identify what might be hazardous if the only lab facilities were in the ship? No holding area, no identification procedures, no staging of supplies on site? First year Geology students could set up a better dig...


I guess you could chalk it all up to stupidity, but yeah, good point.

To that end, I thought the whole notion of landing what is effectively a mothership on a world you know absolutely nothing about was a big problem. Wouldn't it have made more sense to keep that ship in the relative safety of orbit and send down a mobile lab, given you have no idea what you are landing into? Think of all the problems they would have avoided with that one simple precaution.

But then, the ship was an integral part of the story, and landing on the planet drove the rest of the plot, so they kind of had to. I don't know, it's a bit lazy.

15 Jun 2012 11:57 AM
Reply
Diogenes    [TotalFark]  
gilgigamesh: Wouldn't it have made more sense to keep that ship in the relative safety of orbit and send down a mobile lab, given you have no idea what you are landing into? Think of all the problems they would have avoided with that one simple precaution.

It worked so well in Alien and Aliens! ;-)

15 Jun 2012 12:02 PM
Reply
gilgigamesh    [TotalFark]  
Actually, now that I think about it, the main thing they were trying to accomplish by landing the whole ship was to avoid remaking "Aliens". It would have been basically the same story if there was a mothership in orbit.

15 Jun 2012 12:03 PM
Reply
gilgigamesh    [TotalFark]  
Diogenes: gilgigamesh: Wouldn't it have made more sense to keep that ship in the relative safety of orbit and send down a mobile lab, given you have no idea what you are landing into? Think of all the problems they would have avoided with that one simple precaution.

It worked so well in Alien and Aliens! ;-)


Exactly.

15 Jun 2012 12:06 PM
Reply
Sybarite    [TotalFark]  
When the Engineer ship is coming in at the beginning of the film, it looks like there is already some primitive photosynthetic life going on below. I presumed what the Engineer was doing was injecting his DNA into the environment to kickstart the blooming of more complex life. I haven't really read anything about the film, since I wanted to see it without too many preconceived notions. I will say I found it a little odd that the Engineers appeared to have changed not one bit over the course of at least a couple of billion years, even more so for a species that seems to be so into bioengineering.

15 Jun 2012 12:23 PM
Reply
hubiestubert    [TotalFark]  
gilgigamesh: Actually, now that I think about it, the main thing they were trying to accomplish by landing the whole ship was to avoid remaking "Aliens". It would have been basically the same story if there was a mothership in orbit.

The Nostromo's tug landed, and it was a HUGE drop ship on LV-426 in the first movie. That was a haphazard sort of operation, because they were diverted to the beacon, and were a commercial vessel.

The Sulaco was a military op, but at least they tried to isolate their operations.

The story hinged on knocking the tar out of the Engineer ship back down to the planet, and their only ride home. Considering the size of the Nostromo, and the Sulaco, they could have had a drop ship, and at least pretended that they were trying to maintain some sort of safety net. Drop ship lands, checks things out, they bring the Prometheus to set down. It was just a detail that would have made sense. Weyland sits on the main ship, eventually transfers down to the base camp, the drop ship is still big enough to knock the Engineers ship back down. Or they use the Prometheus to knock it out, but their drop ship is damaged in the crash, and thus they are still forced to boot up the Engineers ship.

It was a sort of lazy plotting. that I expect of Damon Lindelof. He is a guy who likes to hang a lot of stuff and retconn later. Details to hang stuff from he sort of leaves around like dirty laundry, and if it doesn't make sense, that's OK, because he figures that it will be a "mystery" as opposed to being thought of as lazy writing...

15 Jun 2012 12:23 PM
Reply
wjllope     

15 Jun 2012 12:34 PM
Reply
bhcompy     
Truly, I don't care about the science in summer science fiction movies. This is why I can enjoy Jeff Goldblum hacking alien spaceships with a Mac.

15 Jun 2012 12:34 PM
Reply
thecpt     
Fact checking here. Didn't Tyson convince Cameron to change clouds, not stars?

15 Jun 2012 12:35 PM
Reply
thecpt     
thecpt: Fact checking here. Didn't Tyson convince Cameron to change clouds, not stars?

nope, I'm wrong.

15 Jun 2012 12:48 PM
Reply
Teknowaffle     
As long as the basics are not screwed up, I am fine with anything. Explaining the "science" behind "science-fiction" really wears on me.

Hell, I don't even mind sound in space (something every nerd loves to biatch about, and gush when a movie "gets it right"), especially if it is a battle scene in Star Wars, or Trek. If it bothers you, imagine the sound is what they hear on the ship.

15 Jun 2012 12:56 PM
Reply
PitifulBean     
It bothers me that the Daily Show has yet to fix their Globe. It's been months since NDGT told Jon Stewart is was spinning the wrong way.

15 Jun 2012 12:57 PM
Reply
Bf+     
More importantly, Neil deGrasse Tyson. is teaming up with the Wu-Tang Clan for their next album!!

15 Jun 2012 12:59 PM
Reply
Teknowaffle     
Also, a couple more gripes about gripes:

"All aliens speak English." Can you imagine having to make up some fake sounding language every episode, and not have the protagonists be able to simply interact with another species?

"All main aliens they meet are humanoid". Yes, they are, because human actors are inherently human shaped. It also helps us relate to the charachter, and understand the motivations behind their actions. You just don't get the same power when it is the blob monster of the snot planet.

15 Jun 2012 01:00 PM
Reply
Egoy3k     
I haven't seen Prometheus yet so I won't be reading the thread in much detail but The Avengers annoyed me with one bit.

Avengers Spoilers

Why wasn't there a rush of air from the atmosphere out into space at the portal above stark tower and why did he fall back into it after throwing the missile at the mothership? Otherwise I enjoyed The Avengers quite a bit.

15 Jun 2012 01:01 PM
Reply
hubiestubert    [TotalFark]  
Egoy3k: I haven't seen Prometheus yet so I won't be reading the thread in much detail but The Avengers annoyed me with one bit.

Avengers Spoilers

Why wasn't there a rush of air from the atmosphere out into space at the portal above stark tower and why did he fall back into it after throwing the missile at the mothership? Otherwise I enjoyed The Avengers quite a bit.


One could argue that the portal essentially acted as a gravity lens...

15 Jun 2012 01:05 PM
Reply
Public Call Box     
hubiestubert: gilgigamesh: There were actually three inconsistencies in Prometheus relating to their distance from Earth.

1. Introductory scroll gives a distance of approximately 35 light years, which is basically "down the street" in our galactic neighborhood;

2. Charlize Theron states we are out "half a billion miles" which is still within our solar system,

3. Logan Marshall-Green, the guy archaeologist, states that the combination of stars found in the various ancient depictions were too far away to be seen by their artists; in fact a combination of 5 stars only 35 light years away is practically right on top of us and should be readily visible to the naked eye.

My only real criticism of the movie. I know its fantasy, but I hate when my sci fi gets sloppy about the basics.

I was just annoyed by the lack of simple procedural details. No base camp. No airlocks. Isolation lab is only accessible from within the ship, but can be jettisoned? Who the heck does an archeological dig out of a truck? No habitat support on site in a toxic atmosphere? Setting a ship the size of a capitol building, with no aerodynamics to speak of, and your only way home, down the gravity well? With the head of the company inside? Physical security for the whole ship is essentially dropping a ramp down like a pick up? Who the Hells decided "Let's do an archeological dig on a planet with huge storms, and let's not set up any emergency procedures except for RUN HARDER!"? How the heck were they supposed to even identify what might be hazardous if the only lab facilities were in the ship? No holding area, no identification procedures, no staging of supplies on site? First year Geology students could set up a better dig...


How the hell does a biologist and a geologist get lost, when they have access to a map for Ghu's sakes just one simple radio call away?

Honestly, that and the biologist not wanting to touch the icky dead body but more than willing to tongue the penis snake...IT MAKES NO SENSE!

15 Jun 2012 01:07 PM
Reply
Eternal Virgin     
farking nerd is ruining my movies!

15 Jun 2012 01:09 PM
Reply
gilgigamesh    [TotalFark]  
Bf+: More importantly, Neil deGrasse Tyson. is teaming up with the Wu-Tang Clan for their next album!!

That is pure awesome.

15 Jun 2012 01:12 PM
Reply
Diogenes    [TotalFark]  
Eternal Virgin: farking nerd is ruining my movies!

And he killed Pluto.

15 Jun 2012 01:12 PM
Reply
MadUncleEoin     
Certain people should be smart enough to realize that some things are allowed to just be entertaining distractions from reality on occasion.

15 Jun 2012 01:16 PM
Reply
DjangoStonereaver    [TotalFark]  
Diogenes: Eternal Virgin: farking nerd is ruining my movies!

And he killed Pluto.


www.floatingpath.com

"Get over it already!"

15 Jun 2012 01:18 PM
Reply
Fano    [TotalFark]  
When shooting fish in a barrel, how powerful of a gun do you need to use?

15 Jun 2012 01:26 PM
Reply
gunther_bumpass     
MadUncleEoin: Certain people should be smart enough to realize that some things are allowed to just be entertaining distractions from reality on occasion.

I woke up to this guy on the radio, and while I do respect his many achievements, he's starting to sound like a smug know-it-all pain in the ass who's finally gotten a taste of fame.

15 Jun 2012 01:31 PM
Reply
discgolfguru     
i121.photobucket.com

15 Jun 2012 01:33 PM
Reply
Lego_Addict     
gunther_bumpass: MadUncleEoin: Certain people should be smart enough to realize that some things are allowed to just be entertaining distractions from reality on occasion.

I woke up to this guy on the radio, and while I do respect his many achievements, he's starting to sound like a smug know-it-all pain in the ass who's finally gotten a taste of fame.


He's always been smug in my mind, do a Google image search for the guy and you'll see enough smuggness to fill a black hole.

15 Jun 2012 02:00 PM
Reply
gunther_bumpass     
Lego_Addict:
He's always been smug in my mind, do a Google image search for the guy and you'll see enough smuggness to fill a black hole.




dude... racial...

15 Jun 2012 02:07 PM
Reply
Gaseous Anomaly     
Teknowaffle: "All main aliens they meet are humanoid". Yes, they are, because human actors are inherently human shaped. It also helps us relate to the charachter, and understand the motivations behind their actions. You just don't get the same power when it is the blob monster of the snot planet.

I thought Farscape did a good job of ducking that trope, by using Muppets. It made their aliens more, well, alien. Though as you point out that's not always what you want in a story...

15 Jun 2012 02:09 PM
Reply
KiplingKat872     

15 Jun 2012 02:34 PM
Reply
Doctor Funfrock     
I appreciate that when he does these science nitpicks he doesn't go overboard or take it too seriously. I know There's more he could go into, but he just picks fun ones or something most people would understand. I always thought he came across as humble as a true need gets, which is endearing. but all nerds like to get a bit cocky at times, especially if you ask them a question about something they know.

15 Jun 2012 02:37 PM
Reply
Lego_Addict     
gunther_bumpass: Lego_Addict:
He's always been smug in my mind, do a Google image search for the guy and you'll see enough smuggness to fill a black hole.



dude... racial...


Not my fault his skin color matches that which no light can escape from.......

/it wasn't intended, seriously, I hired a black summer student just last week

15 Jun 2012 02:41 PM
Reply
DerAppie     
gilgigamesh: There were actually three inconsistencies in Prometheus relating to their distance from Earth.

2. Charlize Theron states we are out "half a billion miles" which is still within our solar system,



Couldn't it just be "we are insanely far away"? People are notoriously bad at imagining large numbers so half a billion would be more than enough to drive your point home.

Disclaimer: I still need to see the movie so I don't know the specifics of the situation.

15 Jun 2012 02:56 PM
Reply
Weidbrewer     
Yay...another scientist insisting on pooping on the popcorn-movie parade. It's summer, let's just have some fun, turn off our brains and enjoy the flippin' air conditioning for a couple of hours.

15 Jun 2012 03:16 PM
Reply
Quigs     
Do people still give a crap about what this guy thinks?

15 Jun 2012 05:32 PM
Reply
DjangoStonereaver    [TotalFark]  
discgolfguru: [i121.photobucket.com image 600x300]

I had to steal that pic and share it on Facebook.

In return, enjoy a month of TF.

15 Jun 2012 06:01 PM
Reply
Yotto     
Weidbrewer: Yay...another scientist insisting on pooping on the popcorn-movie parade. It's summer, let's just have some fun, turn off our brains and enjoy the flippin' air conditioning for a couple of hours.

I think that's exactly the point. If you're going to use a number in your movie, CHECK IT. Use 1 of the 100 million dollars (I just used that number without checking it, but I bet I'm closer than they were) you're spending on the movie and pay someone to LOOK IT UP ON GOOGLE. Is typing "100 light years in miles" (or whatever it is in the movie, I haven't seen it and don't want spoilers so I'm avoiding most everything about it) that hard?

If you don't like the answer, don't use the numbers in your movie.

15 Jun 2012 06:28 PM
Reply
Yotto     
Yotto: Weidbrewer: Yay...another scientist insisting on pooping on the popcorn-movie parade. It's summer, let's just have some fun, turn off our brains and enjoy the flippin' air conditioning for a couple of hours.
...and I quoted the wrong post. I meant to quote:

DerAppie: gilgigamesh: There were actually three inconsistencies in Prometheus relating to their distance from Earth.

2. Charlize Theron states we are out "half a billion miles" which is still within our solar system,



Couldn't it just be "we are insanely far away"? People are notoriously bad at imagining large numbers so half a billion would be more than enough to drive your point home.

Disclaimer: I still need to see the movie so I don't know the specifics of the situation.

15 Jun 2012 06:29 PM
Reply
wjllope     
Yotto: If you don't like the answer, don't use the numbers in your movie.

That's kind-of how I feel. How hard can it be? Google it or call someone. I actually got consulted once for an episode of Bones because, if you google "Physics Expert," I'm the 3rd link. It was the episode when they were both caught in an elevator with a section of seats and couldn't get out. Uncredited unfortunately, but true.

But even so, you can't really fault The Badass Over Here from commenting. In a sense, it's outreach. Besides that though, he can't help it. Lord knows that I groan when I see utter nonsense wrapped in jargon. If I was a talk-show-physicist, I'd comment too.

Can't see how Neil's comments could've impacted anyone's enjoyment of the movie though.... cheers

15 Jun 2012 07:22 PM
Reply
doglover    [TotalFark]  
Angry Drunk Bureaucrat: Geez NPR, go ahead and name drop forchrissakes; we're not idiots. We know who NDGT is.

Some of us would listen to that guy ONLY if he was not named.

15 Jun 2012 07:42 PM
Reply
Neeek     
PitifulBean: It bothers me that the Daily Show has yet to fix their Globe. It's been months since NDGT told Jon Stewart is was spinning the wrong way.

It's the Daily Show. The world spinning the wrong way is a feature, not a bug.

15 Jun 2012 07:48 PM
Reply
Ginnungagap42    [TotalFark]  
KiplingKat872: The Physics of Superheros

That is all.


Actually, *this* is all...

15 Jun 2012 08:58 PM
Reply
John Buck 41    [TotalFark]  
Why does Fark keep sucking this guy's cock?

15 Jun 2012 10:05 PM
Reply
Farkborn     
So he had a problem with with her making an offhand comment about being a long ways from earth, but was ok with a ship that clearly was a sub-light drive vessel travelling 34ly from Earth in 26 months? I think he was not really all that serious about picking on that movie's science.

15 Jun 2012 11:56 PM
Reply
Showing 1-50 of 55 comments
Refresh Page 2
This thread is closed to new comments.


Back To Geek

More Headlines:
Main | Sports | Business | Geek | Entertainment | Politics | Video | FarkUs | Contests | Fark Party