Report This Ad (full site)
Fark.com

Back To Business
   Wine snobs are full of shiat: blind taste test shows the French likes of Clos des Mouches and Château Mouton Rothschild are barely better than a Lavallette orange from New Jersey with its subtle notes of dead mafiosi, corruption and sulfur

15 Jun 2012 08:17 PM   |   6779 clicks   |   The New Yorker
Add Comment
Showing 51-100 of 210 comments
Page 1 Refresh Page 3
bmfderek     
Conjugation fail!

15 Jun 2012 09:03 PM
Reply
Indubitably     
Boudica's War Tampon: Meez: Wine in general in the 70s was crap , no real governing or regulations, American wine was just as crap as French or Italian. The art of winemaking had slipped from previous generations and it was all about profit. Do the same test today and
it would fail miserably , the standards are so strict that an American wine stands out like an American tourist, fat bloated loud obnoxious

Oh you mean like a Fark troll?

/I keed


Did Europe create Fark?

I'm sorry, but I missed that part of the Fark story.

Please explicate.

P.S. Don't go back to immigrants, or I will try to kindly remind you that America was founded by immigrants and shall remain an immingrantish republic as long as you can pay, no? Apologies for the pseudo-threadjack. ;)

15 Jun 2012 09:03 PM
Reply
Ringshadow     
i697.photobucket.com

Supposedly outperformed some French wines and has many awards.

15 Jun 2012 09:03 PM
Reply
Avery614     
Meez: Wine in general in the 70s was crap , no real governing or regulations, American wine was just as crap as French or Italian. The art of winemaking had slipped from previous generations and it was all about profit. Do the same test today and
it would fail miserably , the standards are so strict that an American wine stands out like an American tourist, fat bloated loud obnoxious



In the article they just barely beat NJ recently........That has to be like a pee-wee football team giving the Green Bay Packers a run for their money.

15 Jun 2012 09:05 PM
Reply
ArgusRun     
Enemabag Jones: TomD9938,
Serve over ice... goes great with hot dogs.

Blends piss me off. I can handle white, I can handle red, blushes are this sweet shiat that short of boones farm.

/Now excuse me while I enjoy my $3.00 bottle of cabernet sauvignon.


Roses on the other hand are spectacular.

15 Jun 2012 09:06 PM
Reply
Spanky McStupid     
www.sterlingvineyards.com

2007 - awesome year!

15 Jun 2012 09:07 PM
Reply
NewWorldDan     
Meez: Wine in general in the 70s was crap , no real governing or regulations, American wine was just as crap as French or Italian. The art of winemaking had slipped from previous generations and it was all about profit. Do the same test today and
it would fail miserably , the standards are so strict that an American wine stands out like an American tourist, fat bloated loud obnoxious


Say what? Winemaking is relativley easy. The hard part is getting good grapes. If the weather doesn't cooperate late season and you don't get the right sugar or acid content, you just aren't going to get a great wine. That said, the average grape quality has gone up substantially in the last 3 decades thanks to increased irrigation and a better understanding of soil chemistry. Grape breeding has also become more focused in the last few decades as well. We're creating better varietals. There are even now grapes (Marquette) that grow in Minnesota and make good wines. I have 7 vines of them in my backyard.

I've also done my own wine tasting research. Turns out amature wine drinkers can't differentiate between a merlot and a syrrah. As far as rating the wines, my guests had a clear favorite in the Trader Joe's Costal Zinfandel.

15 Jun 2012 09:09 PM
Reply
Fissile    [TotalFark]  
Told you so! I been telling fark-wits for years that spend more than $10 on a bottle of wine was a waste of money.

15 Jun 2012 09:11 PM
Reply
Onkel Buck     
I used to work at a place that made the synthetic closures for wine bottles. Those spongy corks with the rubbery skin printed with popular shoeless, Australian, and bird etc... labels on them. You know what Im talking about? Well they come out of an extruder at a very high temperture and are ran thirough a long water bath. Well you know that a lot of that a lot of things live water. You should have seen the human brain sized bio-masses of fungus I cleaned out of the circulation pumps, every few weeks. I also picked grapes for a weinmeister when I was stationed in Germany as a goodwill gesture to the locals that had become a tradition. Anyway, I don't drink wine, EVER.

/Make your own, you need a hobby beside FARKing

15 Jun 2012 09:16 PM
Reply
The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves    [TotalFark]  
She keeps her Moet et Chandon
In her pretty cabinet
'Let them eat cake' she says
Just like Marie Antoinette
A built-in remedy
For Kruschev and Kennedy
At anytime an invitation
You can't decline

15 Jun 2012 09:20 PM
Reply
Tellingthem    [TotalFark]  
I really love champagne...but i rarely spend more than 15-20 bucks on a bottle. It seems like at that price point you can usually get a pretty tasty wine. I do like more expensive champagnes but most of the time that little increase in quality is not worth the large increase in price. Oh and for those cheap-asses like me my new favorite regular champagne is Mumm Napa. I've had some pretty good bottles from them lately.

15 Jun 2012 09:22 PM
Reply
Cyno01    [TotalFark]  
I know enough to appreciate the difference between good and bad wines (NOT cheap and expensive) but i still dont see much of a reason to every spend more than $25 a bottle.

15 Jun 2012 09:24 PM
Reply
Boudica's War Tampon     
Indubitably: Boudica's War Tampon: Meez: Wine in general in the 70s was crap , no real governing or regulations, American wine was just as crap as French or Italian. The art of winemaking had slipped from previous generations and it was all about profit. Do the same test today and
it would fail miserably , the standards are so strict that an American wine stands out like an American tourist, fat bloated loud obnoxious

Oh you mean like a Fark troll?

/I keed

Did Europe create Fark?

I'm sorry, but I missed that part of the Fark story.

Please explicate.

P.S. Don't go back to immigrants, or I will try to kindly remind you that America was founded by immigrants and shall remain an immingrantish republic as long as you can pay, no? Apologies for the pseudo-threadjack. ;)


Le Pharque.com used to be popular until le troles inundated the place. They shuttered the place years ago.

15 Jun 2012 09:28 PM
Reply
crabsno termites     
Champipple!

15 Jun 2012 09:30 PM
Reply
crabsno termites     
Boudica's War Tampon: Meez: Wine in general in the 70s was crap , no real governing or regulations, American wine was just as crap as French or Italian. The art of winemaking had slipped from previous generations and it was all about profit. Do the same test today and
it would fail miserably , the standards are so strict that an American wine stands out like an American tourist, fat bloated loud obnoxious

Oh you mean like a Fark troll?

/I keed


Seconded, but i no keed.

15 Jun 2012 09:35 PM
Reply
Indubitably     
Boudica's War Tampon: Indubitably: Boudica's War Tampon: Meez: Wine in general in the 70s was crap , no real governing or regulations, American wine was just as crap as French or Italian. The art of winemaking had slipped from previous generations and it was all about profit. Do the same test today and
it would fail miserably , the standards are so strict that an American wine stands out like an American tourist, fat bloated loud obnoxious

Oh you mean like a Fark troll?

/I keed

Did Europe create Fark?

I'm sorry, but I missed that part of the Fark story.

Please explicate.

P.S. Don't go back to immigrants, or I will try to kindly remind you that America was founded by immigrants and shall remain an immingrantish republic as long as you can pay, no? Apologies for the pseudo-threadjack. ;)

Le Pharque.com used to be popular until le troles inundated the place. They shuttered the place years ago.


So, Europe is full of trolls, then? ;)

15 Jun 2012 09:35 PM
Reply
here to help    [TotalFark]  
IDK, guys. When I pony up the extra couple of bucks for the GOOD box of wine I can taste a difference.

*wine snob noises*

15 Jun 2012 09:36 PM
Reply
Watching_Epoxy_Cure     
Boudica's War Tampon: Bleak house By Charls Dickens :

As much mud in the streets as if the waters had but newly retired from the face of the earth, and it would not be wonderful to meet a Megalosaurus, forty feet long or so, waddling like an elephantine lizard up Holborn Hill. Smoke lowering down from chimney-pots, making a soft black drizzle, with flakes of soot in it as big as full-grown snowflakes--gone into mourning, one might imagine, for the death of the sun. Dogs, undistinguishable in mire. Horses, scarcely better; splashed to their very blinkers.

But it's Brit-speak


Damn. Now I want to read that book.
Thanks!

15 Jun 2012 09:37 PM
Reply
Lady Beryl Ersatz-Wendigo     
The important thing is to drink what you like, not what impresses other people. I also find that- even among the cheaper strata of wines- you'll find better wine if you buy from the region of origin for that type of wine. For example, I tend to buy zinfandels (standard or white) that are made in California, while I buy Rieslings and Gewurtztraminers from Alsace and western Germany.

It helps that I have the palate of a hummingbird. Why are sweet wines usually cheaper?

15 Jun 2012 09:39 PM
Reply
scalpod     
Mais, mais... merde. C'est vrai.

15 Jun 2012 09:39 PM
Reply
12349876     
I can't get the cap off!: Freakonomics did a fascinating segment on wine tasting on their podcast awhile back.

IIRC the best wines in a blind taste test came in around the $15 mark.


There's also the very well known study where a group given prices before a wine tasting enjoyed the expensive stuff more than the control group that didn't get prices.

15 Jun 2012 09:40 PM
Reply
Watching_Epoxy_Cure     
Lady Beryl Ersatz-Wendigo:

It helps that I have the palate of a hummingbird. Why are sweet wines usually cheaper?


I think it's because they're generally younger.

15 Jun 2012 09:42 PM
Reply
12349876     
Boudica's War Tampon: Le Pharque.com used to be popular until le troles inundated the place. They shuttered the place years ago.

But one Le Trole was able to escape and lives on threadshiatting mostly about sexuality related topics.

15 Jun 2012 09:42 PM
Reply
ftroop     
Currently live in Arizona. This state is starting to produce some damn good wines, as previously noted on the Maynard James Keenan thread from earlier in the day. One of my favorites, the AZ Stronghold Nachise!!

15 Jun 2012 09:54 PM
Reply
limboslam     
i486.photobucket.com
Goes good with beer.

15 Jun 2012 10:00 PM
Reply
DrippinBalls     
I shoot wine snobs with cheap quality .22 caliber bullets, THEN i rape their women and daughters.

/and I always leave a bottle of Mogan David, for their lusty desire of the grape.

15 Jun 2012 10:01 PM
Reply
aenemated     
one of my very favorite cabs (dancing bull) generally runs me about 5.99 at the store.

my overall favorite wine, hands down, is casillero del diablo - which is chilean and runs about 9.99 usually.

where i WILL be a snob is sparklings. i loooove a mumm napa brut. cheap sparklings will give me a hangover from hell.

15 Jun 2012 10:02 PM
Reply
rustypouch     
Ah... fark wine threads, where poor people without taste can feel superior to those who like quality.

15 Jun 2012 10:03 PM
Reply
Avonmore     
Watching_Epoxy_Cure: Lady Beryl Ersatz-Wendigo:

It helps that I have the palate of a hummingbird. Why are sweet wines usually cheaper?

I think it's because they're generally younger.


I don't think that's quite right. My interpretation is as follows;

Cheap wines aren't aged, so you taste only the fermented grape juice. More expensive wines are generally aged in wood, which imparts tannins, which imparts an astringent quality that mitigates the overall sweetness (yes, there's also tannins in grape skins, but not nearly as much as in the wood).

So what I'm saying is, it's not that cheap wines are sweet, it's more that expensive (aged) wines aren't.

I think.

15 Jun 2012 10:04 PM
Reply
WhyteRaven74     
There was an interesting piece a few years back that over the years wines have changed to get good scores in the rating system that's used. Problem is, it's the rating system of one person who insists that his preferences are the proper ones. And yeah he's a major d-bag.

15 Jun 2012 10:04 PM
Reply
WhyteRaven74     
rustypouch: Ah... fark wine threads, where poor people without taste can feel superior to those who like quality.

I'll take Perrier Jouet over any other champagne. Cheaper than the usual high end suspects and vastly better. Also it comes in pretty bottles.

15 Jun 2012 10:05 PM
Reply
Onkel Buck     
limboslam: [i486.photobucket.com image 400x599]
Goes good with beer.


and highschool freshman.

15 Jun 2012 10:07 PM
Reply
Daedalus27     
And stories like this are why Wine counterfeiting is such a huge problem in Asia most acutely but worldwide. Take a good bottle, put cheap wine in it, and it magically will be worth the good wine price because everyone thinks it is based on the label. There is no good way to tell the difference (unless they do something asinine like put a white in a red bottle) so its easy money. Just get what tastes good to you and screw the labels and costs. If 2 buck chuck is your thing, more power too you.

15 Jun 2012 10:09 PM
Reply
The Homer Tax     
I dont care about wine, they all taste relatively the same to me within a style. That said, I wouldnt presume to tell someone who actually cares about wine that they cant tell the difference.

Its just like beers, just because *you* cant tell the difference between IPAs doesnt mean I cant. You just dont care enough about beer or that style to learn the difference, which is cool.

But there's probably something you care about that I dont, maybe its some terrible music that all sounds the same to me. Maybe you love guns, and can tell the difference in the kickback from one to another.

The point is that everyone cares about different shiat, and people need to stop concerning themselves so much with what other people like.

A Connaisuer(sorry for the spelling)/Geek/Enthusiast cares about what *they* consume, a snob/jerk/dick cares about what *you* consume.

If you want to drink what I consider to be shiatty beer, more power to you, do what makes you happy. I'm going to drink what makes me happy, 8'm not drinking it becuas eI hink its cool, to impress anyone, or to feel superior to anyone, im drinking it because I like it -same as you.

15 Jun 2012 10:10 PM
Reply
here to help    [TotalFark]  
In all seriousness though I've drank the nastiest cheapo wine up to ridiculously expensive vintages. For the most part the more expensive stuff tastes better... but not so much better that it's worth the insane price jumps.

$15 will get you a decent bottle of GOOD wine that drinks well. You start spending more than that and it MAY taste just a LITTLE better but you are generally getting ripped off.

It's just crushed grapes after all.

Buying vintages as an investment is a different topic altogether.

15 Jun 2012 10:11 PM
Reply
WhyteRaven74     
Avonmore: Cheap wines aren't aged, so you taste only the fermented grape juice

Not all wines are meant to be aged for long. Beaujolais nouveau is aged just a few weeks and then bottled and sold, and some of it is far from cheap. But that's just the nature of the particular wine. And it's not the only type of wine that is made that. There are also many types of wine that are meant to be sweet and some well good luck getting a bottle for under $30 or so. Also there's much to be said for bottle aging.

15 Jun 2012 10:11 PM
Reply
Enemabag Jones     
WhyteRaven74
There was an interesting piece a few years back that over the years wines have changed to get good scores in the rating system that's used. Problem is, it's the rating system of one person who insists that his preferences are the proper ones. And yeah he's a major d-bag.


OK, I don't like sweeter blended wines and maybe white zinfandel deserves a fair shake even though it does not work for all personal tastes.

But what keeps it based on quality vs mass appeal.
What keeps Bud Light from being the best beer and Sutter Home white zinfandel will be the best wine?

/I probably need to understand the specific context.

15 Jun 2012 10:14 PM
Reply
make me some tea    [TotalFark]  
This has been my favorite brand for a couple of years now. $9.99 for the 1.5L bottle.

www.winedeals.com

And I do know good wine, too. But that one's delicious and cheap.

15 Jun 2012 10:20 PM
Reply
archichris    [TotalFark]  
here to help: In all seriousness though I've drank the nastiest cheapo wine up to ridiculously expensive vintages. For the most part the more expensive stuff tastes better... but not so much better that it's worth the insane price jumps.

$15 will get you a decent bottle of GOOD wine that drinks well. You start spending more than that and it MAY taste just a LITTLE better but you are generally getting ripped off.

It's just crushed grapes after all.

Buying vintages as an investment is a different topic altogether.


$7 will get you a decent bottle of wine. Just buy what tastes good to you, ignore the elitists.

My wife drinks 47-pound Rooster Chardonnay....its a sweet white, works anytime. I think its $6 bucks a bottle.

15 Jun 2012 10:21 PM
Reply
kayanlau     
Monster Cables :: Expensive Wines

Audiophiles :: Wine Experts

Am I doing it right?

15 Jun 2012 10:21 PM
Reply
archichris    [TotalFark]  
make me some tea: This has been my favorite brand for a couple of years now. $9.99 for the 1.5L bottle.

[www.winedeals.com image 265x265]

And I do know good wine, too. But that one's delicious and cheap.


archichris: here to help: In all seriousness though I've drank the nastiest cheapo wine up to ridiculously expensive vintages. For the most part the more expensive stuff tastes better... but not so much better that it's worth the insane price jumps.

$15 will get you a decent bottle of GOOD wine that drinks well. You start spending more than that and it MAY taste just a LITTLE better but you are generally getting ripped off.

It's just crushed grapes after all.

Buying vintages as an investment is a different topic altogether.

$7 will get you a decent bottle of wine. Just buy what tastes good to you, ignore the elitists.

My wife drinks 47-pound Rooster Chardonnay....its a sweet white, works anytime. I think its $6 bucks a bottle.


Thats funny, we both recommend it within seconds lol.

15 Jun 2012 10:22 PM
Reply
MaudlinMutantMollusk    [TotalFark]  
Tallman: I work in the wine industry.

This is an open secret. The reason people are willing to pay $1,000 for a bottle of Latour (in a "bad year." Latour in a "good year" is really, really expensive.) is basically because "the book says that Latour is one of the best, so the best are costly." Latour has history, they have a beautiful chateau... but I can't drink those. The reason a Bordeaux blend from New Jersey barely sells for $35 is because nobody thinks of New Jersey when they think of wine. I mean... it's freakin' Jersey!

The secret to finding a good wine for not a ton of money -- look for where people are looking at for good wine (France, Napa, etc). Eliminate those. Then look at what's left. Ask "what areas among those that are left grow lots of the type of wine I'm looking for?" and keep those. Then buy within your budget from what's left. That results in you buying sparkling wines from South Africa (Graham Beck at $17 trumps Veuve Cliquot at $40 IMNSHO), red blends from Argentina (Flichman Dedicado FTW at under $30!), Aussie Chardonnay from Padathaway, etc.


Shenandoah Valley, CA for me

/but then I'm a huge zinfandel freak
//let he who is without zin cast the first stone

15 Jun 2012 10:23 PM
Reply
Boudica's War Tampon     
WhyteRaven74: Avonmore: Cheap wines aren't aged, so you taste only the fermented grape juice

Not all wines are meant to be aged for long. Beaujolais nouveau is aged just a few weeks and then bottled and sold, and some of it is far from cheap. But that's just the nature of the particular wine. And it's not the only type of wine that is made that. There are also many types of wine that are meant to be sweet and some well good luck getting a bottle for under $30 or so. Also there's much to be said for bottle aging.


I used to buy a bottle of Beaujolais Nouveau every year. Nothing expensive but it was sort of like my annual mint julep.

15 Jun 2012 10:24 PM
Reply
WhyteRaven74     
Enemabag Jones: /I probably need to understand the specific context.

The dude in question is Robert Parker, and here's the explanation of his scoring system from his own site. And if you want to see where his more obvious flaws are, if you go to the vintage search on his page, there are entire wine types not listed. Like the legendary Tokaji from Hungary, which has been a much esteemed wine among Europeans for centuries. And he only lists two German wine types. And even his French listing is not complete. Any good wine expert would regard such omissions as deeply flawed and unacceptable.

15 Jun 2012 10:25 PM
Reply
What Plants Crave     
My (red) wine selection process:

while (bevMo5CentSale == true) {
 Grab a few bottles of the ones I like.
 Try a few others in the < $10 price range.
 Drink some.
 Too bitter or acidic? Wait 10 minutes and try again.
 Still? Drink anyway, but do not buy again.
 Headache in the morning? do not buy again.
}

15 Jun 2012 10:26 PM
Reply
TomD9938     
An example of wine in literature.

Velvet Jones reading from Velvet Love.
snl.jt.org

"When she touched her lips to the glass, Lawanda's heart beat inside her. I knew from that very first moment that the three dollars I had spent on wine would not go to waste."

15 Jun 2012 10:27 PM
Reply
here to help    [TotalFark]  
archichris: $7 will get you a decent bottle of wine. Just buy what tastes good to you, ignore the elitists.

My wife drinks 47-pound Rooster Chardonnay....its a sweet white, works anytime. I think its $6 bucks a bottle.


If it's just me or a couple of friends on a lazy afternoon I'm all over the cheap table wines. My main go to is about $6-7. I meant for bringing to a dinner party as a gift or special occasions with a lady friend. That sort of stuff. Even then $10-12 would usually do the trick.

15 Jun 2012 10:28 PM
Reply
WhyteRaven74     
Boudica's War Tampon: Nothing expensive but it was sort of like my annual mint julep.

I love Beaujolais Nouveau myself, hopefully this year I'll get to splurge a bit in a few months. Not that I want to buy an expensive bottle, rather buy a few bottles just to see how different people make it. One of the great things with wine is you can have two vineyards right next to each other growing the same grapes yet their wines won't be exactly alike.

15 Jun 2012 10:30 PM
Reply
IHadMeAVision     
Eh the only wine I can ever stomach is the shiat home-made by the Greek people that live below my mom. Apparently fresh wine from grapes grown in a postage-stamp backyard in Queens is top-notch. Otherwise wine tastes like vinegar to me, might as well drizzle it on my salad.

15 Jun 2012 10:31 PM
Reply
Mad Mark     
They all taste like grape juice & rubbing alcohol to me.
/beer guy

15 Jun 2012 10:32 PM
Reply
Showing 51-100 of 210 comments
Page 1 Refresh Page 3
This thread is closed to new comments.


Back To Business

More Headlines:
Main | Sports | Business | Geek | Entertainment | Politics | Video | FarkUs | Contests | Fark Party