Report This Ad (full site)
Fark.com

Back To Entertainment
   "If you wanted to see Jason Vorhees come anywhere close to the body count that Abe Lincoln ran up during his four years as President, you'd have to wait until the release of Friday The 13th: Part 24,000"

19 Jun 2012 03:43 PM   |   5726 clicks   |   truTV
Add Comment
Showing 1-50 of 95 comments
Refresh Page 2
TheBeastOfYuccaFlats    [TotalFark]  
War of Northern Aggression, blah blah blah.

19 Jun 2012 12:14 PM
Reply
scottydoesntknow    [TotalFark]  
I'm really torn about the Abe Lincoln: Vampire Hunter movie. On the one hand, it's rated R, which it should be as the book was extremely gory. On the other hand, the trailers/previews make it looke like typical action crap with BAYSPLOSIONS!

On the third hand, I really loved the book. One of the best books to blend historical fact with fantasy. I finally got my girlfriend to start reading it (she thought it would suck) and she hasn't put it down since.

I will probably see it just to see what parts they inevitably screw up.

19 Jun 2012 12:24 PM
Reply
TheBeastOfYuccaFlats    [TotalFark]  
The trailer I saw last week actually sold me on being interested. Before that I thought the whole idea was stupid.

19 Jun 2012 12:27 PM
Reply
Apos    [TotalFark]  
I really dig Bekmambetiv's outlandish style. Nightwatch,Daywatch,9 and Wanted were fantastic,and I expect AH:VH to be just as good.



There. I said it.

19 Jun 2012 12:30 PM
Reply
Apos    [TotalFark]  
Apos: I really dig Bekmambetov'soutlandish style. Nightwatch,Daywatch,9 and Wanted were fantastic,and I expect AH:VH to be just as good.



There. I said it.



Fixed.

19 Jun 2012 12:31 PM
Reply
Roja Herring    [TotalFark]  
I've been waiting for this since they used it as a plot device on Party Down

19 Jun 2012 12:37 PM
Reply
ArkAngel    [TotalFark]  
TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: War of Northern Aggression, blah blah blah.

Either that or the War for Southern Independence. American Civil War is a complete misnomer

19 Jun 2012 12:39 PM
Reply
Sybarite    [TotalFark]  
I've never seen a movie that didn't do advanced screenings for reviewers that wasn't a complete pile of crap. Pass

19 Jun 2012 12:43 PM
Reply
CavalierEternal    [TotalFark]  
ArkAngel: TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: War of Northern Aggression, blah blah blah.

Either that or the War for Southern Independence. American Civil War is a complete misnomer


History is written by the victors. If the south wanted a fair shake in the naming of the conflict, they should have won.

19 Jun 2012 12:45 PM
Reply
bdub77    [TotalFark]  
I can't wait to see this movie, it is going to suck so hard.

19 Jun 2012 12:46 PM
Reply
kid_icarus     
I still think Voorhies wins since he hand-slaughtered all 300 of his victims.

19 Jun 2012 12:48 PM
Reply
TheBeastOfYuccaFlats    [TotalFark]  
CavalierEternal: ArkAngel: TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: War of Northern Aggression, blah blah blah.

Either that or the War for Southern Independence. American Civil War is a complete misnomer

History is written by the victors. If the south wanted a fair shake in the naming of the conflict, they should have won.


The North did the South a favor in the end. The South was totally incapable of surviving on its own.

19 Jun 2012 12:52 PM
Reply
kingoomieiii    [TotalFark]  
TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: The North did the South a favor in the end. The South was totally incapable of surviving on its own.

Think about it. Confederate President Rick Scott.

19 Jun 2012 12:53 PM
Reply
bdub77    [TotalFark]  
kingoomieiii: TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: The North did the South a favor in the end. The South was totally incapable of surviving on its own.

Think about it. Confederate President Rick Scott.


North - rich socialist state with standard of living comparable to Europe.

South - poor ass backwards fascist state with standard of living comparable to Mexico.

I'm (still) OK with this.

19 Jun 2012 12:56 PM
Reply
FloydA    [TotalFark]  
ArkAngel: TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: War of Northern Aggression, blah blah blah.

Either that or the War for Southern Independence. American Civil War is a complete misnomer


When you get right down to it, there was very little civility involved.

19 Jun 2012 01:26 PM
Reply
I_C_Weener    [TotalFark]  
Honest Abe? Lied about the vampires, didn't he?

19 Jun 2012 01:29 PM
Reply
hubiestubert    [TotalFark]  
The book was a lot of fun. I am not hopeful that it will do it justice, but then again, if you expect nothing you can't be disappointed.

19 Jun 2012 02:17 PM
Reply
bob_ross     
Sounds like a challenge Subby!

19 Jun 2012 02:19 PM
Reply
Contrabulous Flabtraption    [TotalFark]  
I will never see this movie. I can't imagine something that interests me less.

19 Jun 2012 02:21 PM
Reply
propasaurus    [TotalFark]  
Apos: Apos: I really dig Bekmambetov'soutlandish style. Nightwatch,Daywatch,9 and Wanted were fantastic,and I expect AH L:VH to be just as good.



There. I said it.


Fixed.


Now it's fixed.

19 Jun 2012 02:26 PM
Reply
FriarReb98    [TotalFark]  
This movie...look, it sounds just retarded. Ridiculously retarded. Like "Homer and Peter Griffin got together and wrote a movie but didn't write it together" retarded. And then Opie, the Monkey in Chris's Closet, and the Cat Lady from the Simpsons edited it to add 70% more zazz.

I love vampire movies, but this is just too much.

19 Jun 2012 03:08 PM
Reply
farkingismybusiness    [TotalFark]  
HBO's First Look on this movie did not do it any favors. It looks pretty bad.

19 Jun 2012 03:12 PM
Reply
EnviroDude    [TotalFark]  
I will see this movie. If it doesn't suxars, i will see it twice.

loved the book

//if it does well, maybe they will film Unholy Night

19 Jun 2012 03:14 PM
Reply
Kyro    [TotalFark]  
I will see this film.

19 Jun 2012 03:47 PM
Reply
Igor Jakovsky     
If they used the traditional image of Lincoln, you know, stovepipe hat and the whole get up. I'd probably watch it.

19 Jun 2012 03:51 PM
Reply
ColSanders     
Contrabulous Flabtraption: I will never see this movie. I can't imagine something that interests me less.

This. It looks like a 90-minute internet meme. What's next? Bacon: The Movie?

19 Jun 2012 03:55 PM
Reply
carrion_luggage     
Meet the scriptwriter and his creative muse:

charlieday.fansiter.com

19 Jun 2012 03:56 PM
Reply
LeroyBourne     
ColSanders: Contrabulous Flabtraption: I will never see this movie. I can't imagine something that interests me less.

This. It looks like a 90-minute internet meme. What's next? Bacon: The Movie?


fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net
with cats? Yes, definitely yes.

19 Jun 2012 03:58 PM
Reply
stoli n coke     
kid_icarus: I still think Voorhies wins since he hand-slaughtered all 300 of his victims.

Hopefully, you deducted parts 1 and 5 from the body count.

19 Jun 2012 04:04 PM
Reply
Rent Party     
ArkAngel: TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: War of Northern Aggression, blah blah blah.

Either that or the War for Southern Independence. American Civil War is a complete misnomer


Up here we call it "The War to Preserve the Union from Treasonous Rednecks."

/ TWTPTUFTR

19 Jun 2012 04:04 PM
Reply
Hector Remarkable     
Sic semper vampiris.

19 Jun 2012 04:16 PM
Reply
Millennium     
TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: War of Northern Aggression, blah blah blah.

The guy added in an additional zero, but I don't see anything particularly pro-Confederate in TFA. It is common practice nowadays to lay the blame for all deaths related to any given war on the head of the victor's government at the time the war began. It is unlikely that people of Lincoln time -North or South- would have seen things in quite the same way, but TFA's author is not from that time.

19 Jun 2012 04:19 PM
Reply
Apos    [TotalFark]  
propasaurus: Apos: Apos: I really dig Bekmambetov'soutlandish style. Nightwatch,Daywatch,9 and Wanted were fantastic,and I expect AH L:VH to be just as good.



There. I said it.


Fixed.

Now it's fixed.


Thanks.

19 Jun 2012 04:20 PM
Reply
buttery_shame_cave     
STILL gonna see it.

it looks ridiculously over the top, and that's awesome.

19 Jun 2012 04:28 PM
Reply
palelizard     
Apos: I really dig Bekmambetiv's outlandish style. Nightwatch,Daywatch,9 and Wanted were fantastic,and I expect AH:VH to be just as good.



There. I said it.


Hmm. I'm torn. I loved the Nightwatch books, though I was meh on the movies. If AL:VH is getting the same treatment, that might be one that I get on DVD. There's a lot of other movies I want to see this summer too, which is unusual for me.

19 Jun 2012 04:30 PM
Reply
wildcardjack     
This is almost an original idea, so don't shiat on it too badly.

I sorta want to see The Adventures of Huck Finn and Robot Jim.

There are only so many plots you can bring to the masses before you get labeled "Art House" and relegated to a single showing at Sundance if you're lucky.

19 Jun 2012 04:38 PM
Reply
perigee     
Saw it last night - funny as hell, perhaps unintentionally. The bloodshed was all Super-Cheap CGI, and the guy who played Stonewall Jackson couldn't have gotten a part as an extra in community theater. Lincoln giving little kid Teddy Roosevelt a big stick was pretty idiotic/great.

Well worth seeing, if you enjoy bad cult films.

19 Jun 2012 04:39 PM
Reply
weazometry     
hubiestubert: The book was a lot of fun. I am not hopeful that it will do it justice, but then again, if you expect nothing you can't be disappointed.

Agreed. I picked up the book at the airport on a whim and couldn't put it down once I started. It was really well done. I don't hold out much hope for the movie, either. I'd like to be pleasantly surprised but I can't recall the last time I thought 'wow, that movie was so much better than the book.'

19 Jun 2012 04:43 PM
Reply
Mugato    [TotalFark]  
The trailer was too dark. I do't mean the subject matter, it was dark, I couldn't see shiat. I didn't read the book but I like the premise. I like even more than my historian friend is all pissed off about it. But there's no historical account that Abe didn't hunt vampires. It is important though that they get the non-vampire historical stuff right. That's the only way to sell it.

19 Jun 2012 04:49 PM
Reply
scottydoesntknow    [TotalFark]  
Mugato: I didn't read the book but I like the premise. I like even more than my historian friend is all pissed off about it. But there's no historical account that Abe didn't hunt vampires. It is important though that they get the non-vampire historical stuff right.

The book is great, one of my favorites. I bought it as a coffee table book (who doesn't love the back of the jacket), but ended up reading it in about 3 days. Why is your historian friend pissed off? The author actually did an excellent job of blending the historical facts about his life/events that occurred with fantasy.

I mean, how could I not buy this?:

1.bp.blogspot.com

19 Jun 2012 04:59 PM
Reply
tudorgurl     
I'm just wondering how many morons are going to watch this and think it's historic fact...

/yes, I've already encountered a few
//seriously.

19 Jun 2012 05:17 PM
Reply
Apos    [TotalFark]  
tudorgurl: I'm just wondering how many morons are going to watch this and think it's historic fact...

/yes, I've already encountered a few
//seriously.



That's a good one. No one,not even Paris Hilton,is that idiotic.

19 Jun 2012 05:22 PM
Reply
Mugato    [TotalFark]  
scottydoesntknow: Why is your historian friend pissed off?

Eh, he's an asshole. Yeah, it does look cool. A nice break from comic book movies and sequels.

19 Jun 2012 05:22 PM
Reply
mitchcumstein1    [TotalFark]  
Mugato: The trailer was too dark. I do't mean the subject matter, it was dark, I couldn't see shiat. I didn't read the book but I like the premise. I like even more than my historian friend is all pissed off about it. But there's no historical account that Abe didn't hunt vampires. It is important though that they get the non-vampire historical stuff right. That's the only way to sell it.

Don't ever see a movie with any sort of historical references with a historian, they will ruin it because they will inevitably biatch about how it's inaccurate.

I say this as a person who has a BA in History. I stopped going to movies with classmates, or even having discussions about them because they ruined them. History people are weird.

19 Jun 2012 05:28 PM
Reply
LeroyBourne     
Apos: tudorgurl: I'm just wondering how many morons are going to watch this and think it's historic fact...

/yes, I've already encountered a few
//seriously.


That's a good one. No one,not even Paris Hilton,is that idiotic.


I don't know, I was talking to this kid about Inglorious Basterds, and he thought that was how Hitler went down.

19 Jun 2012 05:29 PM
Reply
Zombie DJ     
Apos: tudorgurl: I'm just wondering how many morons are going to watch this and think it's historic fact...

/yes, I've already encountered a few
//seriously.




No you haven't.

19 Jun 2012 05:31 PM
Reply
Mugato    [TotalFark]  
mitchcumstein1: Don't ever see a movie with any sort of historical references with a historian, they will ruin it because they will inevitably biatch about how it's inaccurate.

Agreed. As a computer programmer/video editor I learned to hold my tongue when they do goofy shiat with computers or use the word "enhance" because no one wants to hear it. Still, people get paid lots of money to write screenplays, even shiatty ones so while I can suspend disbelief with the computer shiat if it advances the plot, simple historical facts should be somewhat accurate. They can shoehorn the vampire hunting in between an accurate account of his life.

19 Jun 2012 05:36 PM
Reply
Flappyhead     
ColSanders: Contrabulous Flabtraption: I will never see this movie. I can't imagine something that interests me less.

This. It looks like a 90-minute internet meme. What's next? Bacon: The Movie?


I'd much rather see The Passion of Raptor Jesus.

19 Jun 2012 05:48 PM
Reply
Rent Party     
mitchcumstein1: Mugato: The trailer was too dark. I do't mean the subject matter, it was dark, I couldn't see shiat. I didn't read the book but I like the premise. I like even more than my historian friend is all pissed off about it. But there's no historical account that Abe didn't hunt vampires. It is important though that they get the non-vampire historical stuff right. That's the only way to sell it.

Don't ever see a movie with any sort of historical references with a historian, they will ruin it because they will inevitably biatch about how it's inaccurate.

I say this as a person who has a BA in History. I stopped going to movies with classmates, or even having discussions about them because they ruined them. History people are weird.


I love history, and if there were any money in it, would have completed my BA in history. I also love it when someone ties fantasy into the historic facts. There is only one movie that has ever pissed me off doing this, and that was "Almost Heros" with Chris Farley and Mathew Perry. I still get a rage on over that abortion.

19 Jun 2012 05:52 PM
Reply
Keigh    [TotalFark]  
I really want to see this movie. Here's the thing... Everybody in the world is SO SICK of remakes, reboots, redos, Rethinks, prequels, sequels.... And here someone has made a movie of a ::gasp:: ORIGINAL IDEA!! and yet, so many people are going, ew, that looks stupid... Ok. maybe it's ridiculous, over the top, unrealisitic, whatever. But you know what? If it bombs, we'll just be telling Hollywood that it's ok to make recycled shiat, and not ok to make something original and new. And that's sad.


Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter. See it to save movie-kind.

19 Jun 2012 05:57 PM
Reply
Showing 1-50 of 95 comments
Refresh Page 2
This thread is closed to new comments.


Back To Entertainment

More Headlines:
Main | Sports | Business | Geek | Entertainment | Politics | Video | FarkUs | Contests | Fark Party