Urban: the new blah.

Dog whistle.

Remember, it is okay when farmers need money from the government, but when black folk need it, THEY ARE WELFARE QUEENS!!!

I wonder if he realizes how many farmers are on food stamps...

Where does the food come from?

MBK: Remember, it is okay when farmers need money from the government, but when black folk need it, THEY ARE WELFARE QUEENS!!!

Also applies to companies.

ginandbacon: I wonder if he realizes how many farmers are on food stamps...

How many farmers can fit on the head of a food stamp?

How much good does it do the farmers to grow it if no one has the money to buy it?

MaudlinMutantMollusk: How much good does it do the farmers to grow it if no one has the money to buy it?

Hush, minorities are on food stamps. We can't allow that.

SilentStrider: ginandbacon: I wonder if he realizes how many farmers are on food stamps...

How many farmers can fit on the head of a food stamp?

I think that depends on the state.

For every dollar spent on food stamps, $1.73 is generated throughout the economy.

Please ask me for a citation.

Well, the farm bill is written in such a way to support large corporate farms and undermine small family farms, so he is technically correct.

1 in 7 people in the United States receives food stamps. That's over 40 million people.

The CBO projects that 15 years from now we'll still have more people on food stamps and will be spending more per person than we did just five years ago. So much for a 'recovery'.



In other words: Stop having kids you can't afford, assholes.

Howie Spankowitz: For every dollar spent on food stamps, $1.73 is generated throughout the economy.

Please ask me for a citation.

Could you provide a citation, good sir?

Rehberg says he is working to include language which protects beet growers



Approves

Shaggy_C: 1 in 7 people in the United States receives food stamps. That's over 40 million people.

The CBO projects that 15 years from now we'll still have more people on food stamps and will be spending more per person than we did just five years ago. So much for a 'recovery'.

[i50.tinypic.com image 640x419]

In other words: Stop having kids you can't afford, assholes.

Maybe conservatives should stop trying to limit or ban birth control.

Tarkus: Shaggy_C: 1 in 7 people in the United States receives food stamps. That's over 40 million people.

The CBO projects that 15 years from now we'll still have more people on food stamps and will be spending more per person than we did just five years ago. So much for a 'recovery'.

[i50.tinypic.com image 640x419]

In other words: Stop having kids you can't afford, assholes.

Maybe conservatives should stop trying to limit or ban birth control.


... aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand we're done here.

Unless you are too dumb to recognize the connection.

MBK: Remember, it is okay when farmers need money from the government, but when black folk need it, THEY ARE WELFARE QUEENS!!!

What in the hell are you talking about? Please show me where he mentions ANYTHING about black people. He says urban people. Urban. The fact that you equate this as racism, ironically makes YOU the racist.

I'm sure the instant we eliminate this assistance for the urban, our national debt will be eliminated and the economy will bounce back!

/I've never played the "identifying racism as racism makes you a racist" card
//I need a shower

SilentStrider: Howie Spankowitz: For every dollar spent on food stamps, $1.73 is generated throughout the economy.

Please ask me for a citation.

Could you provide a citation, good sir?

I have one, but you've have to wait a few until I get back to the desktop. Moody's did a study a while back that showed that if i remember the source right.

Tarkus: Maybe conservatives should stop trying to limit or ban birth control.



There's about a 16 year lag since that's how long it takes little unwanted babby to turn into food stamp hording gang member thug with their own kids. If abortions had stayed up through the 90s we'd have less of a problem today.

Shaggy_C: Tarkus: Maybe conservatives should stop trying to limit or ban birth control.

[oi43.tinypic.com image 524x447]

There's about a 16 year lag since that's how long it takes little unwanted babby to turn into food stamp hording gang member thug with their own kids. If abortions had stayed up through the 90s we'd have less of a problem today.

That may be the dumbest 'but, but CLINTON!' I've ever seen in my life.

GAT_00: SilentStrider: Howie Spankowitz: For every dollar spent on food stamps, $1.73 is generated throughout the economy.

Please ask me for a citation.

Could you provide a citation, good sir?

I have one, but you've have to wait a few until I get back to the desktop. Moody's did a study a while back that showed that if i remember the source right.

Oh, and

GAT_00: That may be the dumbest 'but, but CLINTON!' I've ever seen in my life.

Everything's always about protecting "The Party" with you, isn't it, Gat_00? Get over yourself, this has nothing to do with the president and everything to do with changing demographics. It was actually a bit tongue in cheek, since pregnancy rates and births are down too.

Shaggy_C: Everything's always about protecting "The Party" with you, isn't it, Gat_00?









I couldn't decide which I liked more so I went with all 4.

Shaggy_C: GAT_00: That may be the dumbest 'but, but CLINTON!' I've ever seen in my life.

Everything's always about protecting "The Party" with you, isn't it, Gat_00? Get over yourself, this has nothing to do with the president and everything to do with changing demographics. It was actually a bit tongue in cheek, since pregnancy rates and births are down too.

So people are having fewer babies they can't afford?

Hurray Obama!!

Lionel Mandrake: So people are having fewer babies they can't afford?

I think people are having less babby, but on the flipside less people can afford anything, so the babby that are born are more likely than ever to be food stamp babby.

Shaggy_C: Lionel Mandrake: So people are having fewer babies they can't afford?

I think people are having less babby, but on the flipside less people can afford anything, so the babby that are born formed are more likely than ever to be food stamp babby.

Well, by all means, let's keep food away from that babby because mommy's a whore, am I right?

propasaurus: Where does the food come from?

Came here for this. Thank you.

Lionel Mandrake: Well, by all means, let's keep food away from that babby because mommy's a whore, am I right?

Here's the crux of the issue: Why is it in the year 2000, it cost $18 billion to provide food stamps to 17 million people ($1058 per person), when in the year 2015 it's estimated the cost will be 80 billion for 46 million people (1739 per person). Food prices most certainly did not increase by 60% in the past decade...

Shaggy_C: Lionel Mandrake: Well, by all means, let's keep food away from that babby because mommy's a whore, am I right?

Here's the crux of the issue: Why is it in the year 2000, it cost $18 billion to provide food stamps to 17 million people ($1058 per person), when in the year 2015 it's estimated the cost will be 80 billion for 46 million people (1739 per person). Food prices most certainly did not increase by 60% in the past decade...

Food prices doubled in India just in 2008.

GAT_00: Food prices doubled in India just in 2008.

We give food stamps to India?

Shaggy_C: Here's the crux of the issue: Why is it in the year 2000, it cost $18 billion to provide food stamps to 17 million people ($1058 per person), when in the year 2015 it's estimated the cost will be 80 billion for 46 million people (1739 per person). Food prices most certainly did not increase by 60% in the past decade...

Actually, according to your chart- food prices will be projected at an approximate 60% increase by 2015. Granted, the chart is not detailed enough to see the exact %for each year, but I went with 3% which looks about right(eyeballing it). Cumulatively that is 58.5%

Sorry,

55.8%

When he means "urban" he means "cityfolk", right?

Right?

Shaggy_C: 1 in 7 people in the United States receives food stamps. That's over 40 million people.

The CBO projects that 15 years from now we'll still have more people on food stamps and will be spending more per person than we did just five years ago. So much for a 'recovery'.

[i50.tinypic.com image 640x419]

In other words: Stop having kids you can't afford, assholes.

It's mostly been elderly people needing food aid.

Shaggy_C: Lionel Mandrake: Well, by all means, let's keep food away from that babby because mommy's a whore, am I right?

Here's the crux of the issue: Why is it in the year 2000, it cost $18 billion to provide food stamps to 17 million people ($1058 per person), when in the year 2015 it's estimated the cost will be 80 billion for 46 million people (1739 per person). Food prices most certainly did not increase by 60% in the past decade...

[4.bp.blogspot.com image 630x378]

Because Obama?

Those damned farm subsidy queens, cruising around in their BMW tractors with gold-wire rims, and eating caviar and filet mignon on our dime!

Tarkus: Shaggy_C: 1 in 7 people in the United States receives food stamps. That's over 40 million people.

The CBO projects that 15 years from now we'll still have more people on food stamps and will be spending more per person than we did just five years ago. So much for a 'recovery'.

[i50.tinypic.com image 640x419]

In other words: Stop having kids you can't afford, assholes.

Maybe conservatives should stop trying to limit or ban birth control.

Obviously we just aren't praying enough.

dugitman: Actually, according to your chart- food prices will be projected at an approximate 60% increase by 2015. Granted, the chart is not detailed enough to see the exact %for each year, but I went with 3% which looks about right(eyeballing it). Cumulatively that is 58.5%

That's actually a very good point. I'll just go slink away to the corner now.

In Washington State, the red counties are the welfare queens, the blue counties where people have jobs that pay better are the true Job Creators.

Look at that. The blue counties pay more, and the red counties are the welfare queens.

So its actually the opposite of what the Republican claims.

Go figure.

propasaurus: Where does the food come from?

Obvious question has an obvious answer

Shaggy_C: 1 in 7 people in the United States receives food stamps. That's over 40 million people.

The CBO projects that 15 years from now we'll still have more people on food stamps and will be spending more per person than we did just five years ago. So much for a 'recovery'.

[i50.tinypic.com image 640x419]

In other words: Stop having kids you can't afford, assholes.

Birth Control. It's not just for rich folks anymore!

GAT_00: GAT_00: SilentStrider: Howie Spankowitz: For every dollar spent on food stamps, $1.73 is generated throughout the economy.

Please ask me for a citation.

Could you provide a citation, good sir?

I have one, but you've have to wait a few until I get back to the desktop. Moody's did a study a while back that showed that if i remember the source right.

Oh, and

It's a chart, so it must be true.

buckler: Those damned farm subsidy queens, cruising around in their BMW tractors with gold-wire rims, and eating caviar and filet mignon on our dime!

I love you.

Generation_D: In Washington State, the red counties are the welfare queens, the blue counties where people have jobs that pay better are the true Job Creators.

Look at that. The blue counties pay more, and the red counties are the welfare queens.

So its actually the opposite of what the Republican claims.

Go figure.

Same goes for the individual states. The two biggest welfare hogs in the US are (1) corporations, and (2) red states.

Shaggy_C: In other words: Stop having kids you can't afford, assholes.

When the fark in the history of the world has that ever worked on a large scale?

People are going to fark, and there's nothing to be done about it. Telling them not to is as effective as telling them to stop breathing, or to stop eating and drinking. It's a basic function of life, and people are hard pressed to control it. Especially when they are poor.

"Stop having kids" is not a realistic strategy.

DKinMN: GAT_00: GAT_00: SilentStrider: Howie Spankowitz: For every dollar spent on food stamps, $1.73 is generated throughout the economy.

Please ask me for a citation.

Could you provide a citation, good sir?

I have one, but you've have to wait a few until I get back to the desktop. Moody's did a study a while back that showed that if i remember the source right.

Oh, and

It's a chart, so it must be true.

On what basis do you dispute the veracity of the sources the chart is based off of?

GhostFish: Shaggy_C: In other words: Stop having kids you can't afford, assholes.

When the fark in the history of the world has that ever worked on a large scale?

People are going to fark, and there's nothing to be done about it. Telling them not to is as effective as telling them to stop breathing, or to stop eating and drinking. It's a basic function of life, and people are hard pressed to control it. Especially when they are poor.

"Stop having kids" is not a realistic strategy.

Obviously we need to pray even harder for teens to not have sex.

/Seems to be the Conservative solution to this

ShaggyC's "evidence" of people having too many babies:



The Unemployment rate in the US:



So wait, money spent on food stamps might be related to unemployment?

The bill eliminates direct government payments for crops which aren't planted

Republitards don't like this part? Makes a lot of sense to me. Oh...right. That means Republitards won't like it.