Report This Ad (full site)
Fark.com

Back To Business
   Yahoo's annual "10 Companies That Won't Be Around Next Year" includes some familiar faces and... the Oakland Raiders?

24 Jun 2012 04:22 AM   |   7059 clicks   |   Yahoo
Add Comment
Showing 1-50 of 61 comments
Refresh Page 2
Generation_D     
When will yahoo add yahoo to this list.

24 Jun 2012 12:45 AM
Reply
Sudo_Make_Me_A_Sandwich     
Generation_D: When will yahoo add yahoo to this list.

Yahoo isn't popular in the US, but it has a really strong international base. Yahoo has been the homepage of every Taiwanese computer I've seen, and friends in places like Africa have told me it's very popular. They also have a lot of small money makers. I like to play yahoo games, and a lot of the people on there pay for extra services free accounts don't get. Yahoo personals (which are paid), yahoo auctions, etc, are all money-makers beyond advertising. I doubt Yahoo will go away anytime soon.

24 Jun 2012 12:54 AM
Reply
Mentat    [TotalFark]  
Al Davis may be undead, but his spirit lives on in the Oakland/Los Angeles/Oakland/San Jose Raiders.

24 Jun 2012 01:07 AM
Reply
borg    [TotalFark]  
Mentat: Al Davis may be undead, but his spirit lives on in the Oakland/Los Angeles/Oakland/San Jose Raiders.

I think the 9ers and the Raiders will share the new stadium in Santa Clara starting in 2017. They'll still be called the Oakland Raiders & they'll still be called SF 49ers

While Al Davis had controlling ownership of the team from the 1960s until he died he only got it over 50% in 2006.

24 Jun 2012 01:46 AM
Reply
Makh    [TotalFark]  
Generation_D: When will yahoo add yahoo to this list.

Yeah Yahoo!, what gives?

24 Jun 2012 03:09 AM
Reply
TomD9938     
# 10, Avon

Avon is still around?

24 Jun 2012 05:06 AM
Reply
farkeruk     
TomD9938: Avon is still around?

It makes a profit.

Now, shareholders might like it to make more profit, but their spending on the shares is a sunk cost. If they close it up, they'll be worse off than keeping it running. People don't close profit-making businesses - at worst, someone will buy them.

Remember, before Steve Jobs came back, Apple were losing money for a few years.

24 Jun 2012 05:51 AM
Reply
Ishkur    [TotalFark]  
Makh: Generation_D: When will yahoo add yahoo to this list.

Yeah Yahoo!, what gives?


Yahoo is the Radio Shack of the internet.

24 Jun 2012 06:03 AM
Reply
RexTalionis    [TotalFark]  
24/7 Wallstreet's predictions are pretty hit or miss. Their predictions for 2011 were:

Reader's Digest (Still around)
Blockbuster Video (which they've predicted for several years prior to September 2010, when it finally died.)
Dollar Thrifty Auto Group
T-Mobile (still around)
Moody's Corporation (Still around)
British Petroleum (still around)
Radio Shack (still here)
Zales (still around, albeit much smaller)
Merrill Lynch (still around as a subsidiary of Bank of America)
Kia Motor Company (still around)

24 Jun 2012 07:05 AM
Reply
mr_a    [TotalFark]  
Can't really say I will miss any on the current list.

While they will be around for a while, Sony will eventually be on this list. I believe their quality levels have fallen in recent years and are not improving, and their products went from being cutting edge to me-too.

I think Sears will also be back on this list soon enough. They always seem to be losing, rather than gaining share, a problem in the retail industry. I wouldn't be surprised to see JCPenney start down the same path, as they seem determined to abandon their current customers without attracting new ones.

24 Jun 2012 07:16 AM
Reply
Masso     
I didn't know Salon.com was in such deep shiat.

24 Jun 2012 07:39 AM
Reply
Dwight_Yeast     
Mentat: Al Davis may be undead, but his spirit lives on in the Oakland/Los Angeles/Oakland/San Jose Raiders.

As the Dodgers recently proved, there's no way a major sports team will be allowed to go under, no matter how bad their financial situation.

24 Jun 2012 08:08 AM
Reply
Unobtanium     
I didn't know MetroPCS was in bad shape. I keep seeing their billboards and hearing their radio ads. Then I look at their coverage and read their fine print (19 cents per minute for roaming), and their comparable plans cost me almost as much or more as I'm paying now. I guess if I never traveled or went into rural areas they might be O.K.

OTOH, I've never used them or any of the second tier or MVNO companies, because everyone I know who has tried them gets terrible coverage. I'm tempted because of not having a contract, but I really am happy with my LTE phone, and pretty much voice and data coverage everywhere I go .

24 Jun 2012 08:09 AM
Reply
AdamK     
mr_a: Can't really say I will miss any on the current list.

While they will be around for a while, Sony will eventually be on this list. I believe their quality levels have fallen in recent years and are not improving, and their products went from being cutting edge to me-too.

I think Sears will also be back on this list soon enough. They always seem to be losing, rather than gaining share, a problem in the retail industry. I wouldn't be surprised to see JCPenney start down the same path, as they seem determined to abandon their current customers without attracting new ones.


Sony is fine, they're the GM of electronics makers in that their biggest profit maker is financial services, they're essentially too big to fail for the Japanese gov't not to bail them out, plus they just started the process of restructuring and downsizing their TV business and other failing departments

Sega probably won't actually be making games in the near future - they're already in the first stages of abandoning console game development altogether in favor of bite-size downloadable games, wouldn't be surprised if they just turn into a company that only exists on paper

might as well put THQ on the list, as much as i like their games there's no guarantee any mid-tier developers survive the next 5 years

24 Jun 2012 08:17 AM
Reply
jayhawk88    [TotalFark]  
Hell the way RIM's going they may not even make 2013. We've still got half of 2012 to go after all.

/holding out for Playbooks to be given away in boxes of Cheerios

24 Jun 2012 08:20 AM
Reply
gingerjet     
Ishkur: Yahoo is the Radio Shack of the internet.

And oddly - both make money.

24 Jun 2012 08:30 AM
Reply
gingerjet     
mr_a: While they will be around for a while, Sony will eventually be on this list. I believe their quality levels have fallen in recent years and are not improving, and their products went from being cutting edge to me-too.

Sony is a massive conglomerate and makes more than just TVs you know. Its not going anywhere.

24 Jun 2012 08:32 AM
Reply
SharkTrager     
RexTalionis: Blockbuster Video (which they've predicted for several years prior to September 2010, when it finally died.)

I saw a Blockbuster video this week in Orlando.

24 Jun 2012 08:44 AM
Reply
ThatGuyFromTheInternet     
Talbots, shiat. My mom will biatch and whine about this to no end.

24 Jun 2012 09:02 AM
Reply
rogue49     
Oakland?

Which other city shouldn't have a team based on its earning or city's fading value?

And I love the Raiders, even if they are poor.

24 Jun 2012 09:42 AM
Reply
Foolkiller     
SharkTrager: RexTalionis: Blockbuster Video (which they've predicted for several years prior to September 2010, when it finally died.)

I saw a Blockbuster video this week in Orlando.


Blockbuster is still around but they seem to be slowly closing store by store and going to try and steal the Redbox market.

24 Jun 2012 09:50 AM
Reply
Mugato    [TotalFark]  
No Best Buy?

24 Jun 2012 09:58 AM
Reply
Glockenspiel Hero    [TotalFark]  
gingerjet: Ishkur: Yahoo is the Radio Shack of the internet.

And oddly - both make money.


But even the CEO has no idea how it's still profitable

24 Jun 2012 10:02 AM
Reply
Ken VeryBigLiar     
FTA:Current team managing owner Mike Davis already has said he may move the Raiders back to LA to get a better stadium deal.

That's some killer research Lou, I was unaware this guy:

www.davepear.com

Has become and old, white ginger:

static6.businessinsider.com

I know I've said it before, but if the Raiders really want a new stadium see about something with 40,000 or so seats but creates a scarcity and has amazing sight-lines and amenities. We Raider fans tend to vote on the team's performance with our feet and dollars, so why new try something revolutionary? Consult with the people who built Seattle's stadium on the noise generating parabolic shapes and a few others.

24 Jun 2012 10:05 AM
Reply
ThatGuyFromTheInternet     
Mugato: No Best Buy?

They've probably got another 3-4, but the vultures are circling.
Ken VeryBigLiar: Has become and old, white ginger:

static6.businessinsider.com


WTF is with that hair?

24 Jun 2012 10:09 AM
Reply
jkl65s4     
SharkTrager: RexTalionis: Blockbuster Video (which they've predicted for several years prior to September 2010, when it finally died.)

I saw a Blockbuster video this week in Orlando.


Blockbuster is still around in the DC Area too. While they have probably closed about 1/2 to 3/4 of their stores around where I live, there are still a few including the one near where I live which seem to be still going strong. Being able to survive in some shape or form while their main competition failed completely (Movie Gallery) might actually allow them to survive for a while, Until RedBox can compete on selection and internet bandwidth issues can be better resolved allowing Netflix and any competitors to more fully flourish, I believe the standard movie rental place will still have a niche in the marketplace, even if its heyday has long since passed.

24 Jun 2012 10:17 AM
Reply
Generation_D     
Ken VeryBigLiar: FTA:Current team managing owner Mike Davis already has said he may move the Raiders back to LA to get a better stadium deal.

That's some killer research Lou, I was unaware this guy:

[www.davepear.com image 202x263]

Has become and old, white ginger:

[static6.businessinsider.com image 400x300]

I know I've said it before, but if the Raiders really want a new stadium see about something with 40,000 or so seats but creates a scarcity and has amazing sight-lines and amenities. We Raider fans tend to vote on the team's performance with our feet and dollars, so why new try something revolutionary? Consult with the people who built Seattle's stadium on the noise generating parabolic shapes and a few others.


Thats right, we do it all with parabolic sound shapes. Not amplified crowd noise. And on really big plays we have hydraulic pumps installed in the ground to shake the stadium artificially like a minor earthquake.

24 Jun 2012 10:35 AM
Reply
HempHead     
Unobtanium: I didn't know MetroPCS was in bad shape. I keep seeing their billboards and hearing their radio ads. Then I look at their coverage and read their fine print (19 cents per minute for roaming), and their comparable plans cost me almost as much or more as I'm paying now. I guess if I never traveled or went into rural areas they might be O.K.

OTOH, I've never used them or any of the second tier or MVNO companies, because everyone I know who has tried them gets terrible coverage. I'm tempted because of not having a contract, but I really am happy with my LTE phone, and pretty much voice and data coverage everywhere I go .


MetroPCS is doing ok. They article just says they are "too small to survive". But I think they can do fine picking up the customers that can't afford $80/mnth for Sprint/AT&T/Verizon.

24 Jun 2012 12:07 PM
Reply
redonkulon     
Ishkur: Makh: Generation_D: When will yahoo add yahoo to this list.

I came for this

Yahoo is the Radio Shack of the internet.

awesome

24 Jun 2012 12:40 PM
Reply
Nemo's Brother     
Al Fore will have to go back selling Green Indulgences.

24 Jun 2012 01:10 PM
Reply
basemetal    [TotalFark]  
It's hard to be a Raiders fan, but whether Oakland or LA, the Raiders will live on.

/Just win, baby!

24 Jun 2012 01:12 PM
Reply
haterade     
Masso: I didn't know Salon.com was in such deep shiat.

i guess the mods are looking out for them. at last check they are 3 out of the last 5 greens on the politics tab

24 Jun 2012 01:27 PM
Reply
Another Government Employee     
The probable merger sequence will be Metro PCS by TMoble, then AT&T will pay off enough politicians to swallow TMobile. It may take five years to get there, though.

24 Jun 2012 01:30 PM
Reply
bingethinker    [TotalFark]  
RexTalionis: 24/7 Wallstreet's predictions are pretty hit or miss. Their predictions for 2011 were:

Reader's Digest (Still around)
Blockbuster Video (which they've predicted for several years prior to September 2010, when it finally died.)
Dollar Thrifty Auto Group
T-Mobile (still around)
Moody's Corporation (Still around)
British Petroleum (still around)
Radio Shack (still here)
Zales (still around, albeit much smaller)
Merrill Lynch (still around as a subsidiary of Bank of America)
Kia Motor Company (still around)


This just shows how shoddy their research is. Kia has been on the upswing for a few years. (Basically, ever since Hyundai bought them.) Nobody with any knowledge of the auto industry at all would have predicted Kia was going away. Mitsubishi or Suzuki, maybe.

24 Jun 2012 01:53 PM
Reply
Unobtanium     
HempHead: MetroPCS is doing ok. They article just says they are "too small to survive". But I think they can do fine picking up the customers that can't afford $80/mnth for Sprint/AT&T/Verizon.

That's part of my personal issue with them, the way I use (and places I go with) my "phone" MetroPCS would cost me as much or more a month than Verizon does. I know, YMMV, big news.

I would really like there to be more actual competition in the cell phone market, and in the land-line internet market.

24 Jun 2012 01:56 PM
Reply
Wittenberg Dropout     
Just bring em back to LA baby! Then we can have our 1980's gang reconnaissance where gang bangers had 3 sports jersey options: Lakers, Kings, and the always fashionable Raiders gears.

Colors? What are those?

24 Jun 2012 02:27 PM
Reply
HempHead     
Unobtanium: HempHead: MetroPCS is doing ok. They article just says they are "too small to survive". But I think they can do fine picking up the customers that can't afford $80/mnth for Sprint/AT&T/Verizon.

That's part of my personal issue with them, the way I use (and places I go with) my "phone" MetroPCS would cost me as much or more a month than Verizon does. I know, YMMV, big news.

I would really like there to be more actual competition in the cell phone market, and in the land-line internet market.


I use StraightTalk ( sold at Walmart lol ). $45 month unlimited text, talk, data(not really). They use AT&T's network. The big thing is that you have to buy your own phone and Americans (the 'how mucha month' crowd) seem like getting a "free" phone and paying out the butt in monthly charges.

24 Jun 2012 02:36 PM
Reply
king of vegas    [TotalFark]  
I have been reading Salon and Slate for several years and prefer reading them on my phone because I like the formatting of the mobile site much better. In the past couple months, Salon has not had a mobile site, or at least I can't find one. I figured that was a sign of concern because they probably felt they weren't getting good advertising dollars on the mobile version so they were forcing everyone to use the full version. Anyway, I've stopped reading Salon because of it. It's too much of a pain to scroll around on the page to find stuff on my phone.

24 Jun 2012 02:39 PM
Reply
Goodfella     
Mentat: Al Davis may be undead, but his spirit lives on in the Oakland/Los Angeles/Oakland/San Jose Raiders.


This back and forth is ridiculous. Who are they fooling?

Why don't they just formalize what's been going on: Oakland gets the team for ~10 years, then they ship them down to LA for ~10 years, then ship them back up to Oakland again for another decade. Then back to LA again. Rinse and repeat.

24 Jun 2012 02:54 PM
Reply
Lsherm    [TotalFark]  
king of vegas: I have been reading Salon and Slate for several years and prefer reading them on my phone because I like the formatting of the mobile site much better. In the past couple months, Salon has not had a mobile site, or at least I can't find one. I figured that was a sign of concern because they probably felt they weren't getting good advertising dollars on the mobile version so they were forcing everyone to use the full version. Anyway, I've stopped reading Salon because of it. It's too much of a pain to scroll around on the page to find stuff on my phone.

THANK YOU!

I've been reading Salon for years, (since the beginning, actually) and the one high point is that they had a mobile site that loaded quickly. Since the new redesign the same page that loads on your desktop computer is the exact same one that loads on your phone. It takes a full two minutes to load, and since the pages all render at exactly the same size no matter what screen you're loading them on it's like playing whack a mole to find a link to click on.

It doesn't matter, Salon has been on the fence since it started. I don't think it's ever turned a profit, even when I was paying for Salon Premium along with four or five other suckers. They shut down the best part of the site - the Table Talk, and they've been bleeding experienced journalists for years and replacing them with angry kids.

24 Jun 2012 03:51 PM
Reply
Franco     
Say Hola to the Mexico City Raiders...

24 Jun 2012 04:34 PM
Reply
MBZ321     
If Suzuki does go under, look to pick up one of "their" Equator pick-up trucks on the cheap. They are basically Nissan Frontier clones without some minor frills.

24 Jun 2012 06:22 PM
Reply
ontariolightning     
#11. Phoenix Coyotes

24 Jun 2012 09:43 PM
Reply
SharkTrager     
bingethinker: This just shows how shoddy their research is. Kia has been on the upswing for a few years. (Basically, ever since Hyundai bought them.) Nobody with any knowledge of the auto industry at all would have predicted Kia was going away. Mitsubishi or Suzuki, maybe.

Hell, Kia now has cars beating Lexus, Audi and Infiniti in reviews.

24 Jun 2012 09:52 PM
Reply
Derwood     
Mugato: No Best Buy?

They're about to announce a very big restructure, so let's see how that goes first

24 Jun 2012 11:25 PM
Reply
burber     
What about companies like Garmon that make GPS units? They'll quickly be obsolete. Maybe 2 or 3meet yeats left?

24 Jun 2012 11:29 PM
Reply
SharkTrager     
burber: What about companies like Garmon that make GPS units? They'll quickly be obsolete. Maybe 2 or 3meet yeats left?

Depends on what all they make. Commercial trucking, for example, will not be relying on cell phones.

25 Jun 2012 12:10 AM
Reply
ThatBillmanGuy     
Best Buy cannot die fast enough for me.

25 Jun 2012 01:42 AM
Reply
Lsherm    [TotalFark]  
SharkTrager: burber: What about companies like Garmon that make GPS units? They'll quickly be obsolete. Maybe 2 or 3meet yeats left?

Depends on what all they make. Commercial trucking, for example, will not be relying on cell phones.


Until cell phone GPS gets a little better, Garman will be around.

25 Jun 2012 02:53 AM
Reply
thisone     
Lsherm: SharkTrager: burber: What about companies like Garmon that make GPS units? They'll quickly be obsolete. Maybe 2 or 3meet yeats left?

Depends on what all they make. Commercial trucking, for example, will not be relying on cell phones.

Until cell phone GPS gets a little better, Garman will be around.


I'd say "lots" better.

GPS specialty units are used by more people than drivers. Wouldn't rely on my phone for hiking/trail riding, but I would use a specialty GPS unit.

25 Jun 2012 05:06 AM
Reply
Showing 1-50 of 61 comments
Refresh Page 2
This thread is closed to new comments.


Back To Business

More Headlines:
Main | Sports | Business | Geek | Entertainment | Politics | Video | FarkUs | Contests | Fark Party