Report This Ad (full site)
Fark.com

Back To Entertainment
   Mike Epps confirms his return in The Hangover III

23 Jul 2012 01:35 PM   |   5040 clicks   |   Huffington Post
Add Comment
Showing 1-42 of 42 comments
Refresh
scottydoesntknow    [TotalFark]  
It will take a lot to get me to see this, the biggest being an actual change in the script. Hangover 2 had its laughs, but it was literally the exact same movie as Hangover, just in Bangkok.

23 Jul 2012 01:33 PM
Reply
swankywanky     
scottydoesntknow: It will take a lot to get me to see this, the biggest being an actual change in the script. Hangover 2 had its laughs, but it was literally the exact same movie as Hangover, just in Bangkok.

This, and also my wife and I watched Part 2 and we both were surprised how dark natured that flick was.

23 Jul 2012 01:39 PM
Reply
Wayne 985     
I saw the first movie. It was a fun gimmick. Baffled they've made any sequels

This is getting into Weekend At Bernie's 2 and 3 territory.

23 Jul 2012 01:40 PM
Reply
scottydoesntknow    [TotalFark]  
swankywanky: scottydoesntknow: It will take a lot to get me to see this, the biggest being an actual change in the script. Hangover 2 had its laughs, but it was literally the exact same movie as Hangover, just in Bangkok.

This, and also my wife and I watched Part 2 and we both were surprised how dark natured that flick was.


Maybe we'll get some answers as to whether Stu has AIDS.

23 Jul 2012 01:41 PM
Reply
sure haven't     
The 2nd one was funny enough, but I don't know how much lower they can sink for the gross out factor. Lady-boys, missing teeth, face tattoos, etc. What else can they do?

I mean, I know what they could think of, but what will they put in a movie?
Not sure if I wanna see that. I skipped the last Jackass movie upon hearing some of the stuff they put in there.

23 Jul 2012 01:41 PM
Reply
MoronLessOff     
scottydoesntknow: swankywanky: scottydoesntknow: It will take a lot to get me to see this, the biggest being an actual change in the script. Hangover 2 had its laughs, but it was literally the exact same movie as Hangover, just in Bangkok.

This, and also my wife and I watched Part 2 and we both were surprised how dark natured that flick was.

Maybe we'll get some answers as to whether Stu has AIDS.


Don't kid yourself. Of course he does.

23 Jul 2012 01:44 PM
Reply
texdent    [TotalFark]  
Never saw the first two.

23 Jul 2012 01:47 PM
Reply
Rapmaster2000     
texdent: Never saw the first two.

Saw first one. The first 2/3rds was good. The 3rd act was a mess. They could have called it The Deus Ex Machina. There were about 5 of them in there.

23 Jul 2012 01:50 PM
Reply
devilEther     
I've already seen this movie. Twice.

23 Jul 2012 01:52 PM
Reply
Apos    [TotalFark]  
Mike Epps is occasionally funny. The Hangover was not one of those occasions.

23 Jul 2012 01:59 PM
Reply
The1andonlyZack     
Part 2 was the same damn movie; had a couple funny moments, but overall pointless.

23 Jul 2012 02:01 PM
Reply
DoBeDoBeDo     
How do you "It's the exact same movie" guys rate Evil Dead 1 and 2?

I thought 2 was hilarious just because I completely didn't expect them to go as dark and up the gross out factor like they did. Now I find 1 less funny than 2.

23 Jul 2012 02:06 PM
Reply
Gunny Highway     
Apos: Mike Epps is occasionally funny. The Hangover was not one of those occasions.

content9.flixster.com

www.wearysloth.com

His best roles.

23 Jul 2012 02:08 PM
Reply
IamSoSmart_S_M_R_T     
II was passable (like Stu's temporary love interest), but Galafanakis' lines seemed extremely forced.

/Not interested in seeing III

23 Jul 2012 02:13 PM
Reply
eddievercetti     
Gunny Highway: Apos: Mike Epps is occasionally funny. The Hangover was not one of those occasions.

[content9.flixster.com image 462x226]

[www.wearysloth.com image 321x240]

His best roles.


POPCORN PLAYER!

WE TOP FIGHT SECURITY OF THE WORLD, CRAIG!

23 Jul 2012 02:14 PM
Reply
abhorrent1     
The Hangover movies suck balls. I don't get how anyone thinks they're funny.

23 Jul 2012 02:16 PM
Reply
TheManofPA     
Maybe it will be like Ocean's trilogy where the return to Vegas will make the 3rd one better than the 2nd

23 Jul 2012 02:23 PM
Reply
The Banana Thug     
abhorrent1: The Hangover movies suck balls. I don't get how anyone thinks they're funny.

It looks funny! The first one reminds me of all the hilariously fun things that I think me and my frat bros did in Vegas that one time! So I can TOTALLY relate.

23 Jul 2012 02:24 PM
Reply
SultanofSchwing     
Nobody farking cares Black Doug.

23 Jul 2012 03:18 PM
Reply
Assimilate This     
I thin it's time we get these guys to AA.

23 Jul 2012 03:25 PM
Reply
Archimedes' Principal     
It's nice to see him get work after 'House, MD'.............................

23 Jul 2012 03:31 PM
Reply
westpointer     
I think I speak for all of us when I ask, "Who the heck is Mike Epps?"

(And I have seen both of the Hangover movies.)

23 Jul 2012 03:44 PM
Reply
Moopy Mac     
The Banana Thug: abhorrent1: The Hangover movies suck balls. I don't get how anyone thinks they're funny.

It looks funny! The first one reminds me of all the hilariously fun things that I think me and my frat bros did in Vegas that one time! So I can TOTALLY relate.


Who is kidding who, you've never had a bid accepted to a fraternity.

23 Jul 2012 03:52 PM
Reply
burndtdan     
was anyone else really confused why the young man studying to be a surgeon (whether he wanted to or not) seemed to really not mind permanently losing a finger?

23 Jul 2012 03:54 PM
Reply
MoronLessOff     
burndtdan: was anyone else really confused why the young man studying to be a surgeon (whether he wanted to or not) seemed to really not mind permanently losing a finger?

You're not the only one. Also, could you remind me which hand lost the finger? That might hinder he cello playing as well.

23 Jul 2012 04:00 PM
Reply
MoronLessOff     
MoronLessOff: burndtdan: was anyone else really confused why the young man studying to be a surgeon (whether he wanted to or not) seemed to really not mind permanently losing a finger?

You're not the only one. Also, could you remind me which hand lost the finger? That might hinder he cello playing as well.


I accidentally his.

23 Jul 2012 04:00 PM
Reply
NeverDrunk23     
Is the bearded guy the reason why the group gets into those wacky hijinks in both movies?

23 Jul 2012 04:51 PM
Reply
wildcardjack     
First one was in Vegas, second was in Bangkok. The logical progession is if they wake up on an alien planet.

Or accidentally elected to congress.
Or bound and gagged in Zed's basement, one of them in a gimp suit.

23 Jul 2012 04:51 PM
Reply
MagSeven    [TotalFark]  
NeverDrunk23: Is the bearded guy the reason why the group gets into those wacky hijinks in both movies?

He keeps drugging his "friends" The only way a 3rd Hangover would work for me is if he winds up in prison for his actions. In fact, the 3rd movie should be the Wolfpack goes to prison.

23 Jul 2012 05:23 PM
Reply
blacksharpiemarker     
The original was one of the worst movies I've ever seen.

I felt embarrassed to have every bought a ticket. I walked out of the theater with a sense of shame, and asked myself how such a large crowd of people could have enjoyed a movie so pointless and completely unfunny.

It seems like comedy and music have a lot in common these days.

23 Jul 2012 07:14 PM
Reply
DansLaLuna     
no no no no no and no

23 Jul 2012 07:31 PM
Reply
SockMonkeyHolocaust    [TotalFark]  
Uh oh, we all woke up after a wild night of partying in a different place and we don't remember what happened... AGAIN!

23 Jul 2012 09:01 PM
Reply
Lurk sober post drunk     
SockMonkeyHolocaust: Uh oh, we all woke up after a wild night of partying in a different place and we don't remember what happened... AGAIN!

we really need to stop putting ourselves in such situations and also so forth wit and what not!

23 Jul 2012 10:20 PM
Reply
twat_waffle     
DoBeDoBeDo: How do you "It's the exact same movie" guys rate Evil Dead 1 and 2?

I thought 2 was hilarious just because I completely didn't expect them to go as dark and up the gross out factor like they did. Now I find 1 less funny than 2.


Because the first two Evil Dead movies didn't try to hide that fact.

23 Jul 2012 11:50 PM
Reply
omeganuepsilon     
Here, have some juice.
*SPLARG*

That's what made the first one great, the spot on emulation of that terrible hangover most of us have had a time or seventy three(and if you haven't, WTF are you doing with your life?). The way Zach gets laughs from the guys who really do hate him but the shiat is funny(same scene, "wackin his lil weenis" Cooper's reaction is just the right amount, still drunk and giddy a bit.

The vibe and chemistry was almost entirely missing in 2. Token gags nothing new, and as everyone else said, amped up "gross out" retardedness. I like the apt comparison to Jackass..

Zach is a one trick pony, they need to lose him, permanently. He's the epitome of akward + random because that's who he is, an imbalanced freak. He's not funny, he's pathetic. I've known a couple of people like that in real life, and they're sad individuals, and a bit scary/creepy, certainly not funny.

But hey, I suppose Dane Cook LOVES zach...as someone he can honestly say he's got aced hands down when it comes to comedy.

24 Jul 2012 02:05 AM
Reply
stoli n coke     
twat_waffle: DoBeDoBeDo: How do you "It's the exact same movie" guys rate Evil Dead 1 and 2?

I thought 2 was hilarious just because I completely didn't expect them to go as dark and up the gross out factor like they did. Now I find 1 less funny than 2.

Because the first two Evil Dead movies didn't try to hide that fact.


Both franchises did the same thing. The supposed "sequel" was just a remake of the first movie with a bigger budget.

As for TFA, I don't see how a third movie will work, since the premise has already been stretched paper thin.

Note to studios: not every successful movie franchise needs a part 3.

24 Jul 2012 02:34 AM
Reply
ferro_man     
from what I vaguely recall reading, part 3 is the guys trying to bust Alan out of a psyche ward

24 Jul 2012 03:09 AM
Reply
coldones     
Both Hangover movies were funny. That show Community? Not funny.

24 Jul 2012 10:54 AM
Reply
Phil Ken Sebben     
coldones: Both Hangover movies were funny. That show Community? Not funny.

Notsureifserious.jpg

24 Jul 2012 01:52 PM
Reply
twat_waffle     
coldones: Both Hangover movies were funny. That show Community? Not funny.

9thcivic.com

Trollin'

cache.ohinternet.com

iruntheinternet.com

i.qkme.me

24 Jul 2012 03:57 PM
Reply
kroonermanblack     
blacksharpiemarker: The original was one of the worst movies I've ever seen.

I felt embarrassed to have every bought a ticket. I walked out of the theater with a sense of shame, and asked myself how such a large crowd of people could have enjoyed a movie so pointless and completely unfunny.

It seems like comedy and music have a lot in common these days.


You're farkin edgy there mate. Right farkin edgy. Here's some skinny jeans, and you can turn in your TV you never even watch over there.

Hangover 1 was a funny movie, even when I knew what it was doing. I didn't care about the machinery of the gods, because...it was amusing, and they clearly knew they were pulling shiat out of el asshole at the end and didn't pretend otherwise. Which is fine by me, as long as there's no pretension.

Second one was boring. It wasn't even the same jokes over, it was 'remember how this was funny in the first movie? You'll laugh because you do!'. Which is all sorts of pathetic. The second one just wasn't entertaining because it wasn't much more than a reminder that you saw the first one, and here's an inside joke based on that.

Also community farking sucks. It's not any funnier or more high brow than Glee. Watched the first season of both, and at least Glee never had pretensions of being anything more than super-cheese drama. Community shiat itself in the last episode when they had Joel kiss both female leads.

It's got Anne's tits though (and I don't mean the monkey).

25 Jul 2012 12:59 AM
Reply
blackartemis     
Loved the first one and hated the second one. Hell I was high and in Thailand watching the second. They could have done so much with the plot, but I wonder how much to government here prevented them. Such as the monks not wearing their traditional saffron robes, but rather the Burmese red monks.

Crazier things go on every night in Pattaya than compared to what happened in the second movie. Don't know if I want to see a third, even at the cheap prices here...

25 Jul 2012 11:14 AM
Reply
Showing 1-42 of 42 comments
Refresh
This thread is closed to new comments.


Back To Entertainment

More Headlines:
Main | Sports | Business | Geek | Entertainment | Politics | Video | FarkUs | Contests | Fark Party