Chanty

What's the first rule of Syria Overthrow Club?

Obama's order, approved earlier this year

As the rebels have been putting up a good fight recently..

God dammit, Nappa. I read that as "Saiyan Rebels".

Republicans joining Iran in support of Assad regime in 3...2...1...

This shiat never ends well

Imagine what those plucky Al-Qaida fighters will be able to do with the U.S. on their team again.

/We're gettin' the Taliband back together!

Loucifer: What's the first rule of Syria Overthrow Club?

His name is Bashar al-Assad Paulson.

jaytkay: Republicans joining Iran in support of Assad regime in 3...2...1...

Why not? They'd sell weapons to Iran if it meant achieving their goals.

Apparently, Mitt Romney was briefed.

This makes the third? fourth? high level security leak in the last four months...

Misleading news headline is misleading.

Sergeant Grumbles: God dammit, Nappa. I read that as "Saiyan Rebels".

Better than those Symbian Rebels. *cough *GD*

Sergeant Grumbles: God dammit, Nappa. I read that as "Saiyan Rebels".

...and I read that in Vegeta's voice.

Congratulations, I think we can wrap this thread up now.

/might vote for Romney if he picks Nappa as his VP

SN1987a goes boom: jaytkay: Republicans joining Iran in support of Assad regime in 3...2...1...

Why not? They'd sell weapons to Iran if it meant achieving their goals.

They'd sell their mother to a pimp if it meant a few extra dollars.

TheGogmagog: Better than those Symbian Rebels.



/ Old

jaytkay: TheGogmagog: Better than those Symbian Rebels.

[upload.wikimedia.org image 220x286]

/ Old

Too bad one of Rupert Murdoch's grand kids don't go all radical left wing .

cc_rider: Misleading news headline is misleading.

Eh...not really.

It's okay though...all you lefties can make Fight Club jokes all you want...If it was a "Republican" in Office and the same article came out, you would all be crying your liberal, butt-hurt tears.

I am not saying that I agree or disagree with the "actions taken" to this point, but in typical FARK fashion, you clowns make jokes about something that, if under the "other party" you would scream at the clouds about instead.

...but who are we kidding here...the thousands of people killed there thus far make no difference to you...as long as you can FARK.

SN1987a goes boom: jaytkay: Republicans joining Iran in support of Assad regime in 3...2...1...

Why not? They'd sell They have already sold weapons to Iran if it meant achieving their goals.

This just in, the CIA can pretty do whatever they damn well please. Film at 11

TheGogmagog: Sergeant Grumbles: God dammit, Nappa. I read that as "Saiyan Rebels".

Better than those Symbian Rebels. *cough *GD*

If you're invoking Grables Daughter wouldn't it be better to have her ride in with the Sybian rebels?

Team Coors Light: cc_rider: Misleading news headline is misleading.

Eh...not really.

It's okay though...all you lefties can make Fight Club jokes all you want...If it was a "Republican" in Office and the same article came out, you would all be crying your liberal, butt-hurt tears.

I am not saying that I agree or disagree with the "actions taken" to this point, but in typical FARK fashion, you clowns make jokes about something that, if under the "other party" you would scream at the clouds about instead.

...but who are we kidding here...the thousands of people killed there thus far make no difference to you...as long as you can FARK.

You sound concerned, and butthurt.

Gyrfalcon: SN1987a goes boom: jaytkay: Republicans joining Iran in support of Assad regime in 3...2...1...

Why not? They'd sell weapons to Iran if it meant achieving their goals.

They'd sell their mother to a pimp if it meant a few extra dollars.

If only GW was still in power and he could scream WMD's. Ahhhh, the good old days!

MFAWG: Team Coors Light: cc_rider: Misleading news headline is misleading.

Eh...not really.

It's okay though...all you lefties can make Fight Club jokes all you want...If it was a "Republican" in Office and the same article came out, you would all be crying your liberal, butt-hurt tears.

I am not saying that I agree or disagree with the "actions taken" to this point, but in typical FARK fashion, you clowns make jokes about something that, if under the "other party" you would scream at the clouds about instead.

...but who are we kidding here...the thousands of people killed there thus far make no difference to you...as long as you can FARK.

You sound concerned, and butthurt.

You can hear me?

Knight of the Woeful Countenance: This makes the third? fourth? high level security leak in the last four months...

Plant. This makes the third? fourth? high level security story planted in the last for months...

We can rest easy because we now know he is doing something about Syria.

Bigdogdaddy: If only GW was still in power and he could scream WMD's. Ahhhh, the good old days!

Oh, did you miss when Obama warned about them last week?

Team Coors Light: MFAWG: Team Coors Light: cc_rider: Misleading news headline is misleading.

Eh...not really.

It's okay though...all you lefties can make Fight Club jokes all you want...If it was a "Republican" in Office and the same article came out, you would all be crying your liberal, butt-hurt tears.

I am not saying that I agree or disagree with the "actions taken" to this point, but in typical FARK fashion, you clowns make jokes about something that, if under the "other party" you would scream at the clouds about instead.

...but who are we kidding here...the thousands of people killed there thus far make no difference to you...as long as you can FARK.

You sound concerned, and butthurt.

You can hear me?

We would try to explain to you what a "figure of speech" is, but that would really just be a waste of time since I doubt you'd get it.

Knight of the Woeful Countenance: This makes the third? fourth? high level security leak in the last four months...

When Obama promised transparency, he really meant that he would scapegoat whistleblowers.

When Obama promised a foreign policy of diplomacy, he really meant that if you got in the CIA's way he'd drone you without second thought.

Hmm, I wonder who on the Intelligence Committee would leak this.

/Bachmann is going to end up in Leavenworth.

iawai: Knight of the Woeful Countenance: This makes the third? fourth? high level security leak in the last four months...

When Obama promised transparency, he really meant that he would scapegoat whistleblowers.

When Obama promised a foreign policy of diplomacy, he really meant that if you got in the CIA's way he'd drone you without second thought.

Really? Transparency in National Security issues? What kind of a moron are you?

/Seriously, I want to know what kind so I can avoid that kind.

Republicans are now apparently all about everything being aired and no national security issues should be secret. I guess they really DO hate Reagan.

So...just another one of those things that pretty much everyone besides al-Assad himself would approve of if not for Obama Derangement Syndrome?

Got it.

/off to the next thread

Triumph: Bigdogdaddy: If only GW was still in power and he could scream WMD's. Ahhhh, the good old days!

Oh, did you miss when Obama warned about them last week?

Perhaps he did...but I did not...

...but what is a "warning" from a liberal president, when delivered through a foreign news service really worth. Granted, the BBC is the best news services on this rock, and yes, I know that similar stories were pronounced through the 'Merican media...but it does not really mean much until "something else" happens.

Dropping in spies is great and all, but make a GD decision. Light it up, or let it go. We spend too much time watching the stories and causalities' bodies on T.V...and then argue about what "we" should do.

Just make a fu$king decision.

Sabyen91: Hmm, I wonder who on the Intelligence Committee would leak this.

/Bachmann is going to end up in Leavenworth.

Nope. That would make him look strong just before the election. Right or wrong, strong.

She wouldn't do that. At least not on purpose.

dookdookdook: So...just another one of those things that pretty much everyone besides al-Assad himself would approve of if not for Obama Derangement Syndrome?

Got it.

/off to the next thread

Republicans love Mubarek, bin Laden, Assad, and Ghadaffi.

/It is amazing the corners they paint themselves into.

Teufelaffe: Team Coors Light: MFAWG: Team Coors Light: cc_rider: Misleading news headline is misleading.

Eh...not really.

It's okay though...all you lefties can make Fight Club jokes all you want...If it was a "Republican" in Office and the same article came out, you would all be crying your liberal, butt-hurt tears.

I am not saying that I agree or disagree with the "actions taken" to this point, but in typical FARK fashion, you clowns make jokes about something that, if under the "other party" you would scream at the clouds about instead.

...but who are we kidding here...the thousands of people killed there thus far make no difference to you...as long as you can FARK.

You sound concerned, and butthurt.

You can hear me?

We would try to explain to you what a "figure of speech" is, but that would really just be a waste of time since I doubt you'd get it.

Really...your mom. How about that. Your mom.

/grow up

Lenny_da_Hog: Sabyen91: Hmm, I wonder who on the Intelligence Committee would leak this.

/Bachmann is going to end up in Leavenworth.

Nope. That would make him look strong just before the election. Right or wrong, strong.

She wouldn't do that. At least not on purpose.

She isn't that bright.

Team Coors Light: Triumph: Bigdogdaddy: If only GW was still in power and he could scream WMD's. Ahhhh, the good old days!

Oh, did you miss when Obama warned about them last week?

Perhaps he did...but I did not...

...but what is a "warning" from a liberal president, when delivered through a foreign news service really worth. Granted, the BBC is the best news services on this rock, and yes, I know that similar stories were pronounced through the 'Merican media...but it does not really mean much until "something else" happens.

Dropping in spies is great and all, but make a GD decision. Light it up, or let it go. We spend too much time watching the stories and causalities' bodies on T.V...and then argue about what "we" should do.

Just make a fu$king decision.

Are you farking serious? Do you believe you know everything that is going on, including what the intelligence services are doing? I think we should elect motherfarking Team Coors Light.

Team Coors Light: Triumph: Bigdogdaddy: If only GW was still in power and he could scream WMD's. Ahhhh, the good old days!

Oh, did you miss when Obama warned about them last week?

Perhaps he did...but I did not...

...but what is a "warning" from a liberal president, when delivered through a foreign news service really worth. Granted, the BBC is the best news services on this rock, and yes, I know that similar stories were pronounced through the 'Merican media...but it does not really mean much until "something else" happens.

Dropping in spies is great and all, but make a GD decision. Light it up, or let it go. We spend too much time watching the stories and causalities' bodies on T.V...and then argue about what "we" should do.

Just make a fu$king decision.

Sabyen91: Republicans love ... bin Laden

To be fair to the Republicans, Reagan (PBUH) did suggest he was the moral equivalent of George Washington, and due to their tendency to support the Holy President in lockstep, they are forced to love Bin Laden.

Sock Ruh Tease: Sabyen91: Republicans love ... bin Laden

To be fair to the Republicans, Reagan (PBUH) did suggest he was the moral equivalent of George Washington, and due to their tendency to support the Holy President in lockstep, they are forced to love Bin Laden.

Your post was number 42 so I believe it is the answer to the question of the universe.

Team Coors Light: Teufelaffe: Team Coors Light: MFAWG: Team Coors Light: cc_rider: Misleading news headline is misleading.

Eh...not really.

It's okay though...all you lefties can make Fight Club jokes all you want...If it was a "Republican" in Office and the same article came out, you would all be crying your liberal, butt-hurt tears.

I am not saying that I agree or disagree with the "actions taken" to this point, but in typical FARK fashion, you clowns make jokes about something that, if under the "other party" you would scream at the clouds about instead.

...but who are we kidding here...the thousands of people killed there thus far make no difference to you...as long as you can FARK.

You sound concerned, and butthurt.

You can hear me?

We would try to explain to you what a "figure of speech" is, but that would really just be a waste of time since I doubt you'd get it.

Really...your mom. How about that. Your mom.

/grow up

I always love it when someone on Fark goes for a "your mom" insult followed by "grow up." It's one of the more entertaining forms of "No, YOU!"

Sabyen91: Hmm, I wonder who on the Intelligence Committee would leak this.

/Bachmann is going to end up in Leavenworth.

Honestly, it wouldn't surprise me. This comes out while she's doing McCarthy 2: Muslim Boogaloo, and the Republican party is in desperate need of a popularity boost? (or at least for Obama's popularity to dip below theirs)? This seems like the kind of thing a crazy, desperate person would pull.

jaytkay: TheGogmagog: Better than those Symbian Rebels.

[upload.wikimedia.org image 220x286]

/ Old

Oh, my beloved Tania
How I long to see your face
Photographed in fifteen second intervals
In a bank in San Leandro
A Polaroid of you, Cinque
With a seven-headed dragon
In a house in Daly City

cvb

Teufelaffe: Team Coors Light: Teufelaffe: Team Coors Light: MFAWG: Team Coors Light: cc_rider: Misleading news headline is misleading.

Eh...not really.

It's okay though...all you lefties can make Fight Club jokes all you want...If it was a "Republican" in Office and the same article came out, you would all be crying your liberal, butt-hurt tears.

I am not saying that I agree or disagree with the "actions taken" to this point, but in typical FARK fashion, you clowns make jokes about something that, if under the "other party" you would scream at the clouds about instead.

...but who are we kidding here...the thousands of people killed there thus far make no difference to you...as long as you can FARK.

You sound concerned, and butthurt.

You can hear me?

We would try to explain to you what a "figure of speech" is, but that would really just be a waste of time since I doubt you'd get it.

Really...your mom. How about that. Your mom.

/grow up

I always love it when someone on Fark goes for a "your mom" insult followed by "grow up." It's one of the more entertaining forms of "No, YOU!"

Your mom is so fat that I hope she can find the willpower to stick to a diet and lose the weight before it affects her heart.

/Grow up. :)

LordJiro: Sabyen91: Hmm, I wonder who on the Intelligence Committee would leak this.

/Bachmann is going to end up in Leavenworth.

Honestly, it wouldn't surprise me. This comes out while she's doing McCarthy 2: Muslim Boogaloo, and the Republican party is in desperate need of a popularity boost? (or at least for Obama's popularity to dip below theirs)? This seems like the kind of thing a crazy, desperate person would pull.

I hope she isn't expecting conjugal visits. Marcus is going to go nuts for nuts.

Sabyen91: Team Coors Light: Triumph: Bigdogdaddy: If only GW was still in power and he could scream WMD's. Ahhhh, the good old days!

Oh, did you miss when Obama warned about them last week?

Perhaps he did...but I did not...

...but what is a "warning" from a liberal president, when delivered through a foreign news service really worth. Granted, the BBC is the best news services on this rock, and yes, I know that similar stories were pronounced through the 'Merican media...but it does not really mean much until "something else" happens.

Dropping in spies is great and all, but make a GD decision. Light it up, or let it go. We spend too much time watching the stories and causalities' bodies on T.V...and then argue about what "we" should do.

Just make a fu$king decision.

Are you farking serious? Do you believe you know everything that is going on, including what the intelligence services are doing? I think we should elect motherfarking Team Coors Light.


Do you know everything? Do you have the Intel? Are you Kaiser Soyze?

My point, which you do not get, is "let's get on with it"...blow them up, or leave them be. I, personally, am tired of the stories and speculation regarding Syria...and I could care less either way.

If your President truely cared about the "people" of Syria, a particular decision would have been made by now....but it is important for you to know that the "president" doesn't make the decisions...

...and your mom...not your mom, but your mom.

/fark off

Team Coors Light: Do you know everything? Do you have the Intel? Are you Kaiser Soyze?

And that is exactly why your last post was Down's Syndrome stupid.