Report This Ad (full site)
Fark.com

Back To Sports
   MMA fighter with full complement of arms knocked out by one-armed man

06 Aug 2012 10:12 AM   |   2474 clicks   |   YouTube
Add Comment
Showing 1-28 of 28 comments
Refresh
SmackLT    [TotalFark]  
Well, the other fighter only had one arm, but both knees seemed be functioning just fine

06 Aug 2012 09:35 AM
Reply
ManateeGag    [TotalFark]  
give him a hand ladies and gentlemen!

06 Aug 2012 09:59 AM
Reply
robertus     
4.bp.blogspot.com
Knows the feeling

06 Aug 2012 10:16 AM
Reply
Angry Buddha     
You crazy, one-armed bastard!

/I lol'd

06 Aug 2012 10:19 AM
Reply
mc_madness     
That's blatantly unfair. A nub is much harder than a hand.

Tired of living in a PC society where everyone gets a fair shake regardless of whether they're qualified or not.

06 Aug 2012 10:21 AM
Reply
Theaetetus     
3.bp.blogspot.com
Proud.

06 Aug 2012 10:34 AM
Reply
Sin_City_Superhero    [TotalFark]  
www.evilmilk.com

/oblig

06 Aug 2012 10:42 AM
Reply
strangeguitar     
That was one devastating knee to the jaw.

06 Aug 2012 10:51 AM
Reply
Dogfacedgod     
that twat needs to reboot his career @ the Jiffy Lube. Holy fark, that guy's poon getting days dropped quicker than he did after than knee to the jaw. Losing to a one armed guy is just sad. Seriously, all he would had to to is keep moving to the right and hit him with a right cross and the fight's over....

...then again, he'd be known as the guy who beat a one-armed man -- which is a step above losing to a one-armed man.

06 Aug 2012 11:06 AM
Reply
Shakes999     
Dogfacedgod: that twat needs to reboot his career @ the Jiffy Lube. Holy fark, that guy's poon getting days dropped quicker than he did after than knee to the jaw. Losing to a one armed guy is just sad. Seriously, all he would had to to is keep moving to the right and hit him with a right cross and the fight's over....

...then again, he'd be known as the guy who beat a one-armed man -- which is a step above losing to a one-armed man.


Nope. Not falling for the troll. Almost wrote out a angry paragraph but nothing doing.

06 Aug 2012 11:38 AM
Reply
violentsalvation    [TotalFark]  
It is like 1.5 arms, and he throws some devastating, short quick 'punch-elbows' with that thing.

06 Aug 2012 12:06 PM
Reply
phimuskapsi     
Dogfacedgod: that twat needs to reboot his career @ the Jiffy Lube. Holy fark, that guy's poon getting days dropped quicker than he did after than knee to the jaw. Losing to a one armed guy is just sad. Seriously, all he would had to to is keep moving to the right and hit him with a right cross and the fight's over....

...then again, he'd be known as the guy who beat a one-armed man -- which is a step above losing to a one-armed man.


Moron. The one-handed guy is 9-0 now in MMA events. If it's so easy to fight him, why hasn't he lost? Why don't you step up to the plate and try and take him out if it's so easy.

06 Aug 2012 12:13 PM
Reply
Dogfacedgod     
phimuskapsi: ? Why don't you step up to the plate and try and take him out if it's so easy.

I will!

06 Aug 2012 12:14 PM
Reply
IAmRight    [TotalFark]  
phimuskapsi: If it's so easy to fight him, why hasn't he lost?

Because, much like fighting a woman, the only way to win is not to fight. He does have a point that if you beat him, you get no credit because hey, you have two arms, way to beat up on someone with a handicap...and if you lose HAHAHAHAHAHAHA oh man you lost to a guy with one arm!

06 Aug 2012 12:15 PM
Reply
pmmal     
Alexander the Great is not impressed, according to a probably false story my math teacher told me.

/"forewarned is forearmed"
//4 is an even number
///but 4 is an odd number of arms for a man to have
////only number that is both odd and even is infinity
//therefore... oh never mind

06 Aug 2012 12:30 PM
Reply
phimuskapsi     
It's like the guy with no legs in the Olympics. Why is this any different? He HAS no handicap in the ring, he's another fighter who just happens to be missing his left forearm and hand. He won't biatch if he gets knocked out to his disability, there is a reason he's allowed to fight with non-handicapped fighters, because he doesn't see himself as handicapped in a fight!

06 Aug 2012 12:31 PM
Reply
Big Beef Burrito     
Did he win by threatening to touch the other guy with his freaky nub?

06 Aug 2012 12:42 PM
Reply
tortilla burger     
I hear he's got a killer one-one punch

06 Aug 2012 12:54 PM
Reply
IAmRight    [TotalFark]  
phimuskapsi: It's like the guy with no legs in the Olympics. Why is this any different? He HAS no handicap in the ring, he's another fighter who just happens to be missing his left forearm and hand. He won't biatch if he gets knocked out to his disability, there is a reason he's allowed to fight with non-handicapped fighters, because he doesn't see himself as handicapped in a fight!

Pure rationality and reality have nothing to do with one another.

06 Aug 2012 01:07 PM
Reply
Skyrmion     
I wonder if he's allowed to "elbow" with his stub. I remember when Kyle Maynard fought, the athletic commission actually insisted on trying to put gloves over his stubs and the fight almost got called off when they couldn't find a way to get them to stay on.

06 Aug 2012 01:35 PM
Reply
elguerodiablo     
One step closer to 'One legged man wins ass-kicking contest'.

06 Aug 2012 02:33 PM
Reply
Skyrmion     
elguerodiablo: One step closer to 'One legged man wins ass-kicking contest'.

It's been done.

06 Aug 2012 02:40 PM
Reply
KrmtDfrog     
in fairness to those who don't know about Nick, he's now 8-0, so that guy has 7 other friends to commiserate with

06 Aug 2012 05:02 PM
Reply
StillInFayettestan     
Wow.

06 Aug 2012 05:44 PM
Reply
Babboonrash     
*Before the knee - "Shiat son... bout to take out the trash on you boy"

*After the knee - "I LIKE TOITLES"

06 Aug 2012 06:22 PM
Reply
Bonanza Jellybean     
There's a reason I didn't watch that card, and it's because Michael Schiavello's voice makes me want to run toward the nearest living thing and kill it.

06 Aug 2012 07:46 PM
Reply
RogermcAllen    [TotalFark]  
phimuskapsi: It's like the guy with no legs in the Olympics. Why is this any different? He HAS no handicap in the ring, he's another fighter who just happens to be missing his left forearm and hand. He won't biatch if he gets knocked out to his disability, there is a reason he's allowed to fight with non-handicapped fighters, because he doesn't see himself as handicapped in a fight!

Three differences:
1. This guy doesn't have a prosthetic punching hand that feels no pain.
2. This guy chose to play exclusively with the fully functional guys. The guy running the 400 in the Olympics is actually going to compete in the Paralympics after he lost in the Olympics
3. In MMA you can make a better case for missing an arm giving him an unfair weight advantage

/all mma fighers should shave their bodies bald (except for ass hair) and get their appendices, tonsils, and teeth taken out to get rid of dead weight
//not taking anything away from the mma guy, I think he's great

06 Aug 2012 10:27 PM
Reply
van1ty     
how is this a fail? the one armed guy is 8-0 as a pro, with 7 finishes. he's legit.

07 Aug 2012 03:20 PM
Reply
Showing 1-28 of 28 comments
Refresh
This thread is closed to new comments.


Back To Sports

More Headlines:
Main | Sports | Business | Geek | Entertainment | Politics | Video | FarkUs | Contests | Fark Party