(full site)
Fark.com

Back To Main
   The Hell You Say: Are the new outfits too skimpy for the Dallas Mavericks' Cheerleaders?

09 Nov 2012 12:09 AM   |   35271 clicks   |   Yahoo
Add Comment
Showing 1-50 of 216 comments
Refresh Page 2
View Comments:
Cewley    [TotalFark]  
A TFer votes: not skimpy enough.

08 Nov 2012 10:18 PM
Reply
NuttierThanEver    [TotalFark]  
Short answer? No

08 Nov 2012 10:19 PM
Reply
bingethinker    [TotalFark]  
No. It's not like they're going outside to cheer.

08 Nov 2012 10:28 PM
Reply
The Great EZE     
No, but they are ugly as hell. I'm going out on a limb and saying a straight man designed those abominations--we don't know what looks good on cheerleaders.

08 Nov 2012 10:32 PM
Reply
markie_farkie    [TotalFark]  
Those too skimpy? No. Poorly tailored, yes.

fwtc.files.wordpress.com

THIS is too skimpy.

08 Nov 2012 10:54 PM
Reply
ManateeGag    [TotalFark]  
God Bless Mark Cuban

08 Nov 2012 11:13 PM
Reply
Marcus Aurelius    [TotalFark]  
They need smmitches. And fries. And calamari. With a side of steamed clams.

08 Nov 2012 11:23 PM
Reply
NowhereMon     
Very nice, reminds me of 5th element.

08 Nov 2012 11:24 PM
Reply
Podmore    [TotalFark]  
Not too skimpy. Also not flattering.

08 Nov 2012 11:28 PM
Reply
Lorelle    [TotalFark]  
Looking at this
l2.yimg.com

made me immediately think of this
upload.wikimedia.org

/I'm obviously NOT a dude

08 Nov 2012 11:29 PM
Reply
ArkAngel    [TotalFark]  

Lorelle: Looking at this
[l2.yimg.com image 630x302]

made me immediately think of this
[upload.wikimedia.org image 250x348]

/I'm obviously NOT a dude


The cheerleaders seems to have the same body fat level as Holocaust victims

08 Nov 2012 11:33 PM
Reply
Elzar     
Approves.

img145.imageshack.us

08 Nov 2012 11:34 PM
Reply
Uchiha_Cycliste     
why are there no pictures of them from behind?

08 Nov 2012 11:58 PM
Reply
simplicimus     

Lorelle: Looking at this
[l2.yimg.com image 630x302]

made me immediately think of this
[upload.wikimedia.org image 250x348]

/I'm obviously NOT a dude


I had the exact same thought, and I'm a dude. Although Maus is a must read, I was wondering what it had to do with whatever sport was being played.

09 Nov 2012 12:05 AM
Reply
p4p3rm4t3     
Red banana standing by...

09 Nov 2012 12:10 AM
Reply
AverageAmericanGuy    [TotalFark]  
It's not that they are too skimpy, but rather they have that godawful strip down the middle which gives the illusion of them wearing less. But if you spend any time at all looking at it, you notice that it does nothing except make a mess of the women's naturally sexy lines. They are bisected, and not in a good way.

09 Nov 2012 12:12 AM
Reply
InternetSecurityGuard     
Been to a local swimmin' hole lately? These cover a lot more than the ass floss on a string bikini.

09 Nov 2012 12:13 AM
Reply
pissedoffmick    [TotalFark]  

Podmore: Not too skimpy. Also not flattering.


Agree. They are awful.

09 Nov 2012 12:13 AM
Reply
lokis_mentor    [TotalFark]  
Made me think of
upload.wikimedia.org

09 Nov 2012 12:14 AM
Reply
MFAWG     

simplicimus: Lorelle: Looking at this
[l2.yimg.com image 630x302]

made me immediately think of this
[upload.wikimedia.org image 250x348]

/I'm obviously NOT a dude

I had the exact same thought, and I'm a dude. Although Maus is a must read, I was wondering what it had to do with whatever sport was being played.


I didn't make the connection, but I read it as 'Maus' too.

09 Nov 2012 12:14 AM
Reply
Lorelle    [TotalFark]  

ArkAngel: The cheerleaders seems to have the same body fat level as Holocaust victims


I remember when the L.A. Rams first had cheerleaders in the late 1970s. I went to a game with my dad, brothers, and Dad's best friend and his sons, the youngest being 5 years old. The cheerleaders' outfits had huge teardrop cutouts to show off the boobies. The 5-year-old said to me, "Why do they have butts on the front of them?"

Those outfits were pretty obscene for that time. Some fans even threw things at the cheerleaders' chests. I think they lasted only a few weeks...by mid-season, the cheerleaders had completely different outfits that were only slightly low-cut.

09 Nov 2012 12:15 AM
Reply
Smeggy Smurf     
Too skimpy? No
Look like shiat? Yes
Greatly improved by laying on the floor? Oh hell yeah

09 Nov 2012 12:15 AM
Reply
Incontinent_dog_and_monkey_rodeo     
I can't wait until 2020, when the required uniform will be pasties and a butt plug.

09 Nov 2012 12:15 AM
Reply
Rev.Veggie.Spam     
2.bp.blogspot.com

/just sayin' somebody is one strip of fabric down the front away from owing a royalty check

09 Nov 2012 12:15 AM
Reply
Maechyll     

Uchiha_Cycliste: why are there no pictures of them from behind?


For the love of all that is Holy--THIS!

09 Nov 2012 12:16 AM
Reply
King Something    [TotalFark]  

Podmore: Not too skimpy. Also not flattering.


Agreed. Skimpy isn't always sexy.

That landing strip between the top and the bottom really kills it for me -- get rid of that bit and we'll talk. I'm even willing to trade it in for a long-sleeve turtleneck (so long as it's as snug as the current outfit) and kneesocks that almost all the way to the hem of the miniskirt.

09 Nov 2012 12:19 AM
Reply
Fark Rye For Many Whores     

simplicimus: Lorelle: Looking at this
[l2.yimg.com image 630x302]

made me immediately think of this
[upload.wikimedia.org image 250x348]

/I'm obviously NOT a dude

I had the exact same thought, and I'm a dude. Although Maus is a must read, I was wondering what it had to do with whatever sport was being played.


This. I think it was my disappointed dudeness looking for something else to do after noticing these outfits are, in no way, too skimpy. Look at those weird strips covering their bellybuttons! I'm not turned on I feel deprived.

09 Nov 2012 12:19 AM
Reply
p4p3rm4t3     
img19.imageshack.us
/oblig

09 Nov 2012 12:23 AM
Reply
RayD8     

Rev.Veggie.Spam: /just sayin' somebody is one strip of fabric down the front away from owing a royalty check


The fact that that image came to mind is creepy.

/just sayin.

09 Nov 2012 12:24 AM
Reply
FunkOut    [TotalFark]  
Why not just have them naked with feathers in their butts?

09 Nov 2012 12:28 AM
Reply
publikenemy     
Meh, they're not bad but those girls have pointy knees

09 Nov 2012 12:30 AM
Reply
Omahawg     
I'd rather see their belly buttons 'cause I like looking at holes on women

wait. what? that sounds bad

I like looking at women's ho....oh fark it

09 Nov 2012 12:30 AM
Reply
King Something    [TotalFark]  

InternetSecurityGuard: Been to a local swimmin' hole lately? These cover a lot more than the ass floss on a string bikini.


Think about a sexy-but-not-too-sexy bikini -- one that'll make any healthy male take a second glance but still covers enough that it would be allowed to be shown on American television -- and then imagine the kind of reaction people would have if a woman were to wear that same bikini in public anywhere other than a local swimmin' hole, south Florida, or Hawai'i.

That's why some people are saying the Mavs' cheerleaders' outfits are too skimpy (and why some are saying, whether in earnest or in jest, that they aren't skimpy enough)

09 Nov 2012 12:31 AM
Reply
Di Atribe    [TotalFark]  
These are just modified from last year's abominations:

i.imgur.com

I don't know who's designing these, but they are utterly tasteless. You can be sexy with some taste. You can even be skimpy with some taste. These just look trashy. I know their purpose is to give men something to ogle lest they go 15 minutes without seeing a hot woman and lose their boner, but really, this IS supposed to be a family event & I'd really prefer it if our dancers looked like dancers and not the erotic kind. Much better:

i.imgur.com

09 Nov 2012 12:32 AM
Reply
Bennie Crabtree     
Well those look stupid.

And the holocaust reference on them is just bizarre.

09 Nov 2012 12:32 AM
Reply
Loren     

The Great EZE: No, but they are ugly as hell. I'm going out on a limb and saying a straight man designed those abominations--we don't know what looks good on cheerleaders.


Yeah. There's no such thing as took skimpy in a cheerleader's outfit but there sure is ugly.

09 Nov 2012 12:34 AM
Reply
Fart_Machine     

FunkOut: Why not just have them naked with feathers in their butts?


t2.gstatic.com

09 Nov 2012 12:34 AM
Reply
L.D. Ablo    [TotalFark]  
bigdaddyrugby.files.wordpress.com

09 Nov 2012 12:35 AM
Reply
detroitdoesntsuckthatbad     
I just showed this to my wife who responded with "That's exactly the dress I'm looking for but I want it with long sleeves."

/it's nice being married to a Chivette

09 Nov 2012 12:35 AM
Reply
pissedoffmick    [TotalFark]  

Di Atribe: These are just modified from last year's abominations:

[i.imgur.com image 535x800]

I don't know who's designing these, but they are utterly tasteless. You can be sexy with some taste. You can even be skimpy with some taste. These just look trashy. I know their purpose is to give men something to ogle lest they go 15 minutes without seeing a hot woman and lose their boner, but really, this IS supposed to be a family event & I'd really prefer it if our dancers looked like dancers and not the erotic kind. Much better:

[i.imgur.com image 404x680]


If example #2 is ok with your family it is AOK for my 15 minute boner requirement.

09 Nov 2012 12:35 AM
Reply
Clemkadidlefark     
Short Enough Guide™

When it can be clearly seen you mow the lawn, then it's just the right amount of skimpy.

09 Nov 2012 12:36 AM
Reply
Sofa King Smart     
2.bp.blogspot.com

09 Nov 2012 12:38 AM
Reply
FunkOut    [TotalFark]  

detroitdoesntsuckthatbad: I just showed this to my wife who responded with "That's exactly the dress I'm looking for but I want it with long sleeves."

/it's nice being married to a Chivette


Is that some kind of garlic scented whore? I'm not up on these new internet things the kids are into.

09 Nov 2012 12:38 AM
Reply
elguerodiablo     
I would need to see video evidence before I can fap, erm I mean decide if they're too skimpy.

09 Nov 2012 12:38 AM
Reply
starzman2003     
No. Next question.

09 Nov 2012 12:39 AM
Reply
pissedoffmick    [TotalFark]  
I am just going to leave this here.

i.cdn.turner.com

09 Nov 2012 12:40 AM
Reply
ladyfortuna     

ArkAngel: Lorelle: Looking at this
[l2.yimg.com image 630x302]

made me immediately think of this
[upload.wikimedia.org image 250x348]

/I'm obviously NOT a dude

The cheerleaders seems to have the same body fat level as Holocaust victims


No. I'm not gonna be the one to bring those pictures in here, but no. They're not a lot higher body fat % but they're still pretty healthy looking. I read Viktor Frankle's Man's Search For Meaning and it really drove the whole Holocaust thing home.

09 Nov 2012 12:44 AM
Reply
thisiszombocom     
what does cuban have against belly buttons?

09 Nov 2012 12:44 AM
Reply
UsikFark    [TotalFark]  
Is that supposed to be a handle?

09 Nov 2012 12:46 AM
Reply
gsmphoto     
Whar belly button?! Whar!?

09 Nov 2012 12:48 AM
Reply
Showing 1-50 of 216 comments
Refresh Page 2
View Comments:
This thread is closed to new comments.


Back To Main

More Headlines:
Main | Sports | Business | Geek | Entertainment | Politics | Video | FarkUs | Contests | Fark Party | Combined