| LA realizes there may be a conflict of interest in using a tagger to remove graffiti |
||
| Add Comment | ||
| Showing 1-8 of 8 comments | ||
| Refresh | ||
| morgen_benner
Police said the ex-employee of Graffiti Protective Coatings defaced various parks more than 100 times and got cash to clean it up. Medrano reportedly billed the city $2,200. So, a contractor for the city realized they hired an unscrupulous employee who was defrauding them? Almost the same as the headline says... |
||
| SubBass49
Best part of the whole article: A woman later came to the door and said, "What does he have to say for doing something like that... allegedly? Nothing really. Bye." |
||
| probesport
People who annoy you /Ohhhh Taggers, right... //Taggers |
||
| Goodfella
Makes about as much sense as having your vice president be the guy who runs Halliburton, and that worked out great. |
||
| NeoBad
I don't understannd. How is hiring someone who puts tags on clothing going to cause a problem and why would they hire such a person to do something like this anyway...... |
||
| mortimer_ford
Guy was 53 years old. What did he write? F*ck Nixon? |
||
| baronvonzipper Inspected by number 12 |
||
| rnatalie ROMANES EUNT DOMUS.... or perhaps ROMANI ITE DOMUM. Now write it down 100 times. |
||
| Showing 1-8 of 8 comments | ||
| Refresh | ||
| This thread is closed to new comments. |
close