stupid, ignorant, talking point parrot, worthless twat hack is what I would have called her.

Now that's funny.

I laughed.

How dare she.

Her little rant was quite amusing.

EatTheWorld: stupid, ignorant, talking point parrot, worthless twat hack is what I would have called her.

How dare she use facts to justify her world view!?

Hey, if Mann Coulter is fair game, then so is Rachael Manddow.

I apologize to Ms. Maddow and any others who may have been offended by my comments, as they do not reflect my firm beliefs in individual and equal rights, and they certainly do not represent the opinions or position of my employer WXIX-TV.

Non-apology apology.

I'm not a Maddow fan, but publicly posting something like that with your name and highly public job attached is just... I don't know if there's a word for stupidity like that.

Being gay, I am somewhat biased. I'd have handed her the severance check first thing Monday morning.

It's a maaaan baby!!

EatTheWorld: stupid, ignorant, talking point parrot, worthless twat hack is what I would have called her.

And the GOP wonders why everyone thinks they hate women.

I doubt Rachel was very upset about this, she's been insulted every which way but Sunday. So, why the firing? Zero tolerance policy, probably.

I hope they can kiss and make up

while I watch.

super_grass: Hey, if Mann Coulter is fair game, then so is Rachael Manddow.

Mann might be a lesbian, too. But even if she re-invented herself as one of the protected classes, it probably wouldn't go any different for her.

Pundits: Newscasters for the stupid.

aww cmon, she's always smiling

super_grass: Hey, if Mann Coulter is fair game, then so is Rachael Manddow.

This.

You're fooling yourself and you don't believe it.
You're killing yourself and you don't believe it.

Matthew Keene: Being gay, I am somewhat biased. I'd have handed her the severance check first thing Monday morning.

Being straight, I'd have done the same. We are talking about a Fox affiliate, however, so we'll see how they handle it.

"I'm sorry if anyone was offended" apology has been posted, of course.

It wasn't a Facebook post, it was a Fox News audition.

You mean Rachael Maddow isn't a dude?

Cythraul: I doubt Rachel was very upset about this, she's been insulted every which way but Sunday. So, why the firing? Zero tolerance policy, probably.

TFA only mentioned she missed one broadcast and would be back tomorrow. Where did you heat about the firing?

You guys would hate Maddow too if she was clearly right and the GOP propaganda outlets were so wrong.

Especially if you were a typical homophobic sexist republican.

davidphogan: I'm not a Maddow fan, but publicly posting something like that with your name and highly public job attached is just... I don't know if there's a word for stupidity like that.

Pretty much. And, speaking as a liberal, I would expect some sort of punishment if she had gone after Ann Coulter in the same manner.

You're a f*cking news anchor; at least pretend to be objective even on your social networks.

davidphogan: I'm not a Maddow fan, but publicly posting something like that with your name and highly public job attached is just... I don't know if there's a word for stupidity like that.

There is such a word: Fox

Does Rachel take it up the pooper with the gusto that Coulter does?

Presumably from Rosie O'Donnell with a big ol' strap-on, one presumes.

AdolfOliverPanties: I apologize to Ms. Maddow and any others who may have been offended by my comments, as they do not reflect my firm beliefs in individual and equal rights, and they certainly do not represent the opinions or position of my employer WXIX-TV.

Non-apology apology.

Apology apology.

Why would she apologize to anyone other than Maddow, and other people who may have been offended?

EatTheWorld: stupid, ignorant, talking point parrot, worthless twat hack is what I would have called her.

The outrage that an actual librul media outlet exists warms the cockles of my heart

I wouldn't call Rachel Maddow angry. Glib, snarky, and aggressive in calling out lies of the right when they so willfully distort the truth, yes. An angry young man, well no. Actually, her future looks quite bright, to me.

If you want to see an angry commentator, check out Michelle Malkin. The other day, I caught all of 15 seconds of her ranting about Benghazi. So much anger in one person...she can't be healthy. Or happy, for that matter.

TheGogmagog: Cythraul: I doubt Rachel was very upset about this, she's been insulted every which way but Sunday. So, why the firing? Zero tolerance policy, probably.

TFA only mentioned she missed one broadcast and would be back tomorrow. Where did you heat about the firing?

My brain must have inserted it into the article subconsciously.

dumb biatch. trying to get a network job i see

face down in the street with a gun in her hand.
giggity goo.
giggty goo.


/// and her mamma cries...

s1ugg0: EatTheWorld: stupid, ignorant, talking point parrot, worthless twat hack is what I would have called her.

How dare she use facts to justify her world view!?

Come on, Rachel Maddow is not really a young man.

Aarontology: EatTheWorld: stupid, ignorant, talking point parrot, worthless twat hack is what I would have called her.

And the GOP wonders why everyone thinks they hate women.

Sit down and shut up while the men are talking politics.

On one hand - rants, screeds and jokes about another person's sexual orientation are so last century.

On the other hand, maybe it's time to grow a pair and let some of this shiat go without ruining the doucheball commenter's life. Sometimes it's enough to know that the doucheball has self-identified...

Who the fark actually watches TV news besides old people, anyway? Honestly.

I can't imagine that many of Rachael Maddow's target audience watch cable news. Even the popular shows on Fox represent a tiny population of the country by viewership, but we're told that what these people say is what everyone on a particular side believes.

EatTheWorld: stupid, ignorant, talking point parrot, worthless twat hack is what I would have called her.

Oh, somebody's mad~! Someone's angry that people use facts to discredit BS talking points.

/looks at you
//puts sunglasses on
///deal with it

topcon: Who the fark actually watches TV news besides old people, anyway? Honestly.

I can't imagine that many of Rachael Maddow's target audience watch cable news. Even the popular shows on Fox represent a tiny population of the country by viewership, but we're told that what these people say is what everyone on a particular side believes.



Leave Rachel Maddow alone!

AdolfOliverPanties: I apologize to Ms. Maddow and any others who may have been offended by my comments, as they do not reflect my firm beliefs in individual and equal rights, and they certainly do not represent the opinions or position of my employer WXIX-TV.

Non-apology apology.



Yes, but I prefer:

I apologize to Ms. Mr. Maddow and any others who may have been offended by my comments, as they do not reflect my firm beliefs in individual and equal rights, and they certainly do not represent the opinions or position of my employer WXIX-TV. 

/double down on the lolz


Was watching FNC (for the lolz) with a friend who does not follow politics the day after the election when Ann Coultier came on. My friends was all "what??? who is??? Her hair looks really nice, but she's kind of ...dimorphic isn't she?"

FNC lolz - it delivers.

I can see the void in those eyes O.O

fruitloop: It wasn't a Facebook post, it was a Fox News audition.

[i171.photobucket.com image 384x480]

She is hot, so she is forgiven.

You see it is funny because she is a lesbian and has short hair so therefore she is like a man. The joke is that she has more masculine traits than feminine traits.

Cubs300: I wouldn't call Rachel Maddow angry. Glib, snarky, and aggressive in calling out lies of the right when they so willfully distort the truth, yes. An angry young man, well no. Actually, her future looks quite bright, to me.


Yeah she'll Get up, get back on her feet, She's the one they can't beat and she knows it.

The Muthaship: Apology apology.

Why would she apologize to anyone other than Maddow, and other people who may have been offended?

Uh, it was a non-apology because it was the standard boilerplate we get today.

Apology: "What I said was stupid/wrong/insensitive, and I'm sorry."
vs.
Non-apology: "I'm sorry if I offended anyone by what I said."

bim1154: You mean Rachael Maddow isn't a dude?

This.

Cubs300: I wouldn't call Rachel Maddow angry. Glib, snarky, and aggressive in calling out lies of the right when they so willfully distort the truth, yes. An angry young man, well no. Actually, her future looks quite bright, to me.

She's a woman. Also a hack.

Maddow was on Colbert and I swear you could see his Adam apple.

I guess the lesson here is "don't look back in anchor."

Waaaaahhh! Someone said something on Facebook! I don't like it! Waaaahhhh!
Facebook sucks ass!
ASS!