(full site)
Fark.com

Back To Main
   Elmo Accuser Recants His Recant

19 Nov 2012 03:27 PM   |   17192 clicks   |   Newser
Add Comment
Showing 1-50 of 211 comments
Refresh Page 2
View Comments:
Cythraul     
Looks like this scumbag wants more money.

19 Nov 2012 01:12 PM
Reply
Diogenes    [TotalFark]  
Justice needs to be served one way or the other, but...

Last week, the Smoking Gun took a look at Stephens, a struggling model/actor who has been arrested a few times on charges ranging from passing a bad check to reckless driving to robbing a former employer at knifepoint.

...the accuser isn't exactly holding a strong hand.

19 Nov 2012 01:14 PM
Reply
Walker    [TotalFark]  

Cythraul: Looks like this scumbag wants more money.


No. Looks like he was paid off to change his story (it's a fact he was as the article states) and it was eating at him.

19 Nov 2012 01:15 PM
Reply
Diogenes    [TotalFark]  

Cythraul: Looks like this scumbag wants more money.


Nickel (and Dime) Me Elmo

19 Nov 2012 01:16 PM
Reply
Diogenes    [TotalFark]  

Walker: Cythraul: Looks like this scumbag wants more money.

No. Looks like he was paid off to change his story (it's a fact he was as the article states) and it was eating at him.


That's an interpretation. I could just as easily interpret that his lawyers told him he could fleece more money.

So let's not jump to conclusions.

19 Nov 2012 01:19 PM
Reply
Cythraul     

Walker: Cythraul: Looks like this scumbag wants more money.

No. Looks like he was paid off to change his story (it's a fact he was as the article states) and it was eating at him.


FTA: (he was reportedly crying during the negotiations while saying he didn't want to sign)

Reported by whom? His lawyers?

19 Nov 2012 01:19 PM
Reply
Slaxl    [TotalFark]  

Walker: Cythraul: Looks like this scumbag wants more money.

No. Looks like he was paid off to change his story (it's a fact he was as the article states) and it was eating at him.


Everything articles state are facts now? Good grief.

19 Nov 2012 01:24 PM
Reply
James!    [TotalFark]  
No takebacks.

19 Nov 2012 01:24 PM
Reply
James!    [TotalFark]  

Slaxl: Walker: Cythraul: Looks like this scumbag wants more money.

No. Looks like he was paid off to change his story (it's a fact he was as the article states) and it was eating at him.

Everything articles state are facts now? Good grief.


TMZ is a paragon of truth.

19 Nov 2012 01:26 PM
Reply
Hipchewy1     

Walker: Cythraul: Looks like this scumbag wants more money.

No. Looks like he was paid off to change his story (it's a fact he was as the article states) and it was eating at him.


Considering his past, my guess is he wants more money.

He has been arrested in the past for knife point robbery from a music manager for whom he interned, passing bad checks and reckless driving.

19 Nov 2012 01:32 PM
Reply
James!    [TotalFark]  
And it looks like this dude is talking to new lawyers since the Sandusky firm dropped his ass.

19 Nov 2012 01:38 PM
Reply
FirstNationalBastard    [TotalFark]  
He discredits his story even more with each flip-flop.

Or, as has been said, Someone was convinced they could get MORE money.

19 Nov 2012 01:39 PM
Reply
Marcus Aurelius    [TotalFark]  
Maybe he just wants his own TV show.

19 Nov 2012 01:40 PM
Reply
PhiloeBedoe     
i1079.photobucket.com

19 Nov 2012 01:43 PM
Reply
tallguywithglasseson    [TotalFark]  

Walker: it's a fact


It's a claim. Should be easy to prove if true.

19 Nov 2012 01:46 PM
Reply
FirstNationalBastard    [TotalFark]  

tallguywithglasseson: Walker: it's a fact

It's a claim. Should be easy to prove if true.


If the Sesame folks did an investigation, I can't believe they would cover for someone having sex with an underage boy.

Sesame Workshop has way too much to lose to go all Penn State. Their business IS products and entertainment for children. To harbor someone who had sex with a minor would kill the company dead.

19 Nov 2012 01:50 PM
Reply
vygramul    [TotalFark]  
Either way, he blew it. Without compelling evidence, he's not even going to have the 100k or so.

19 Nov 2012 01:51 PM
Reply
Sybarite    [TotalFark]  
Over the weekend, TMZ reported that Clash had paid Stephens $125,000 to recant his story

My take away from all of this is that I had no idea puppeteering paid so well.

19 Nov 2012 01:51 PM
Reply
Nadie_AZ    [TotalFark]  
Crazy exes are still crazy. Whether they are male or female. Sleep with crazy and you get crazy results.

19 Nov 2012 01:55 PM
Reply
Cythraul     

Sybarite: Over the weekend, TMZ reported that Clash had paid Stephens $125,000 to recant his story

My take away from all of this is that I had no idea puppeteering paid so well.


www.twistermc.com

It's all about moi-chan-dize-ing.

19 Nov 2012 01:56 PM
Reply
vartian    [TotalFark]  

Walker: Cythraul: Looks like this scumbag wants more money.

No. Looks like he was paid off to change his story (it's a fact he was as the article states) and it was eating at him.


If you believe a guy who robbed someone at knife point. I'm not saying it didn't happen, but I need more than his word on it, especially after he's changed his story so much.

19 Nov 2012 01:58 PM
Reply
Diogenes    [TotalFark]  
Clash should just run with it and change the act's name to Pickle Me Elmo. Lemons...lemonade.

/or lemon party

19 Nov 2012 01:58 PM
Reply
syrynxx    [TotalFark]  
The mob definition of an honest man - once he's bought, he stays bought.

19 Nov 2012 02:07 PM
Reply
cretinbob    [TotalFark]  
SO that makes him a liar liar?
I didn't even know this guy got the GOP nomination.

19 Nov 2012 02:09 PM
Reply
brigid_fitch    [TotalFark]  

Sybarite: Over the weekend, TMZ reported that Clash had paid Stephens $125,000 to recant his story

My take away from all of this is that I had no idea puppeteering paid so well.


Only if you're John Malkovitch

19 Nov 2012 02:15 PM
Reply
cretinbob    [TotalFark]  
www.mediaite.com
Hey guize, wuts goin' on in dis thred?

19 Nov 2012 02:15 PM
Reply
tallguywithglasseson    [TotalFark]  

FirstNationalBastard: If the Sesame folks did an investigation, I can't believe they would cover for someone having sex with an underage boy.


The claim I was referring to was being paid $125,000 by the accused to change his story.

You don't need an investigation or anything to show receipt of a $125,000 payment.

While it wouldn't prove that the rest of his story is true, it would help his credibility, which appears to be in need of some help at the moment.

19 Nov 2012 02:16 PM
Reply
kid_icarus    [TotalFark]  

Cythraul: Looks like this scumbag wants more money.


He also managed to pull off the rarely accomplished boomerang rape.

19 Nov 2012 02:17 PM
Reply
Diogenes    [TotalFark]  

kid_icarus: Cythraul: Looks like this scumbag wants more money.

He also managed to pull off the rarely accomplished boomerang rape.


That's not legitimate rape, though.

19 Nov 2012 02:20 PM
Reply
FirstNationalBastard    [TotalFark]  

tallguywithglasseson: FirstNationalBastard: If the Sesame folks did an investigation, I can't believe they would cover for someone having sex with an underage boy.

The claim I was referring to was being paid $125,000 by the accused to change his story.

You don't need an investigation or anything to show receipt of a $125,000 payment.

While it wouldn't prove that the rest of his story is true, it would help his credibility, which appears to be in need of some help at the moment.


Ah, yes, well, a $125k payout would be simple enough to prove, wouldn't it?

19 Nov 2012 02:21 PM
Reply
SilentStrider    [TotalFark]  
Put this guy in front of a jury, and there's no way you get a conviction,

19 Nov 2012 02:22 PM
Reply
CapeFearCadaver    [TotalFark]  
This sounded sketchy as hell when it first broke. 3 story switches later and it still sounds sketchy as hell.

19 Nov 2012 02:25 PM
Reply
Barfmaker    [TotalFark]  
Dude your pants are totally on fire.

19 Nov 2012 03:23 PM
Reply
Somaticasual     
It's always sad when hush money talks break down..

19 Nov 2012 03:29 PM
Reply
GORDON     
Elmo didn't know that Elmo should never stick his dick in crazy.

19 Nov 2012 03:33 PM
Reply
Snarfangel     
You can't recant your recant.

19 Nov 2012 03:33 PM
Reply
Nightsweat     
So get the police involved. Either a crime was committed or not. If so, he's required to give evidence. If not, he's guilty of extortion. In either case someone should be jailbound here.

19 Nov 2012 03:33 PM
Reply
physt     

FirstNationalBastard: tallguywithglasseson: Walker: it's a fact

It's a claim. Should be easy to prove if true.

If the Sesame folks did an investigation, I can't believe they would cover for someone having sex with an underage boy.

Sesame Workshop has way too much to lose to go all Penn State. Their business IS products and entertainment for children. To harbor someone who had sex with a minor would kill the company dead.


/What a Sesame Street Investigation may look like...
images-mediawiki-sites.thefullwiki.org

19 Nov 2012 03:34 PM
Reply
Dr Dreidel    [TotalFark]  

Diogenes: Justice needs to be served one way or the other, but...

Last week, the Smoking Gun took a look at Stephens, a struggling model/actor who has been arrested a few times on charges ranging from passing a bad check to reckless driving to robbing a former employer at knifepoint.

...the accuser isn't exactly holding a strong hand.


And it's totally impossible that someone (an abuser) would prey on someone with such a history, or that a troubled soul (perhaps there was some OTHER abuse - not Elmo-related - in his past) would again find himself in trouble?

// as you say, justice needs to be served one way or t'other
// but let's not jump to any conclusion other than "this story is farked more ways from more days than Sasha Grey's calendar"

19 Nov 2012 03:34 PM
Reply
MrEricSir     
See, this proves that sexuality is nurture rather than nature. Why else would a young man who watched Sesame Street as a child be attracted to Elmo?

19 Nov 2012 03:35 PM
Reply
Helena Handbasket     
Guy's got crazy eyes to match his crazy claims.

19 Nov 2012 03:36 PM
Reply
Elegy     
It's so obvious here that the homosexual lifestyle of the principle parties is responsible for the complete lack of morality exhibited by these individuals.

Wake up America! When will you see that homosex is corrupting our society?

19 Nov 2012 03:37 PM
Reply
PirateKing     
It's almost as if someone else is putting words in his mouth...

joke about puppets and hands up asses.

19 Nov 2012 03:38 PM
Reply
JackieRabbit     
This idiot little twink doesn't get it. He accepted a settlement. He doesn't now get to say "Here's your money back. I was pressured." He has no credibility now. Actually, he had very little to begin with. Had he any proof of this, he would have gone to the police and worried about the civil liability part later. He's trying to shake Clash down.

19 Nov 2012 03:38 PM
Reply
HotWingConspiracy    [TotalFark]  

tallguywithglasseson: While it wouldn't prove that the rest of his story is true, it would help his credibility


Not really.

Unless you consider changing your story for money as an aid to credibility.

At best he has made it impossible to believe him one way or the other, and in the absence of any evidence...well it's time to move on to the next grift/armed robbery.

19 Nov 2012 03:39 PM
Reply
Shaggy0717     

Diogenes: Walker: Cythraul: Looks like this scumbag wants more money.

No. Looks like he was paid off to change his story (it's a fact he was as the article states) and it was eating at him.

That's an interpretation. I could just as easily interpret that his lawyers told him he could fleece more money.

So let's not jump to conclusions.


FTA: and sources say he's happy to give up the $125,000.

Here's another interpretation:
give up some money (that I'd have to anyway) to make MORE money

19 Nov 2012 03:39 PM
Reply
Diogenes    [TotalFark]  

Dr Dreidel: Diogenes: Justice needs to be served one way or the other, but...

Last week, the Smoking Gun took a look at Stephens, a struggling model/actor who has been arrested a few times on charges ranging from passing a bad check to reckless driving to robbing a former employer at knifepoint.

...the accuser isn't exactly holding a strong hand.

And it's totally impossible that someone (an abuser) would prey on someone with such a history, or that a troubled soul (perhaps there was some OTHER abuse - not Elmo-related - in his past) would again find himself in trouble?

// as you say, justice needs to be served one way or t'other
// but let's not jump to any conclusion other than "this story is farked more ways from more days than Sasha Grey's calendar"


No, that's very plausible. They are easy to prey on, and they are easy to discredit.

19 Nov 2012 03:40 PM
Reply
acaciaavenue     
$125k to take it up the @ss? Don't tell my wife that, or I'll never afford being able to get in the backdoor.

19 Nov 2012 03:41 PM
Reply
Podmore    [TotalFark]  

tallguywithglasseson: FirstNationalBastard: If the Sesame folks did an investigation, I can't believe they would cover for someone having sex with an underage boy.

The claim I was referring to was being paid $125,000 by the accused to change his story.

You don't need an investigation or anything to show receipt of a $125,000 payment.

While it wouldn't prove that the rest of his story is true, it would help his credibility, which appears to be in need of some help at the moment.


Except if the lawyers were any good, there would be papers saying he wanted to avoid the trial and settle out of court without admitting guilt. The money would only prove that he settled.

19 Nov 2012 03:42 PM
Reply
FTGodWin     

FirstNationalBastard: tallguywithglasseson: Walker: it's a fact

It's a claim. Should be easy to prove if true.

If the Sesame folks did an investigation, I can't believe they would cover for someone having sex with an underage boy.

Sesame Workshop has way too much to lose to go all Penn State. Their business IS products and entertainment for children. To harbor someone who had sex with a minor would kill the company dead.


Ya know, I bet somewhere in a Google cache is a post on some forum stating the very same thing in regards to Penn St., especially in defense of Paterno.

/ but as we all know now
// rhythmic slapping will not be denied.

19 Nov 2012 03:44 PM
Reply
Showing 1-50 of 211 comments
Refresh Page 2
View Comments:
This thread is closed to new comments.


Back To Main

More Headlines:
Main | Sports | Business | Geek | Entertainment | Politics | Video | FarkUs | Contests | Fark Party | Combined