| Pentagon memo on over-classification of documents classified "For Official Use Only" |
||
| Add Comment | ||
| Showing 1-18 of 18 comments | ||
| Refresh | ||
| gopher321 Well, that actually makes sense. /dnrtfa |
||
| seancakes
FOUO is one of the absolute lowest classification markings in existence. Aside from unclassified, that is. |
||
| Evil Twin Skippy
/snerk |
||
| Silverstaff
seancakes: FOUO is one of the absolute lowest classification markings in existence. Aside from unclassified, that is. FOUO IS Unclassified. It's a caveat placed on Unclassified information meaning it is not intended for public release. It isn't a classification unto itself. The lowest level that is actually "Classified" from a legal/technical standpoint is Confidential. |
||
| Evil Twin Skippy
seancakes: FOUO is one of the absolute lowest classification markings in existence. Aside from unclassified, that is. FOUO isn't a real classification. It's all over government forms. There is Classified, Secret, Top-Secret, and UltraFa... ***NO CARRIER*** |
||
| EZ Writer
*adjusts Command Security Manager hat* Ahem... FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO): applies to unclassified information that is exempt from mandatory release to the public under Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and may be used for protecting a variety of information. There are three levels of classification defined in terms of level of damage -- CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET and TOP SECRET. However, there are many different levels of special handling. FOUO is a special handling caveat, specifically, a type of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). And now I feel like I've worked on my day off... *shakes tiny fist* |
||
| Wrencher
Well ##### and ##### in a #####. |
||
| Iceman_Cometh
EZ Writer: *adjusts Command Security Manager hat* Ahem... FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO): applies to unclassified information that is exempt from mandatory release to the public under Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and may be used for protecting a variety of information. There are three levels of classification defined in terms of level of damage -- CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET and TOP SECRET. However, there are many different levels of special handling. FOUO is a special handling caveat, specifically, a type of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). And now I feel like I've worked on my day off... *shakes tiny fist* I'm counting your post as quarterly security training. |
||
| Evil Twin Skippy
Iceman_Cometh: EZ Writer: *adjusts Command Security Manager hat* Ahem... FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO): applies to unclassified information that is exempt from mandatory release to the public under Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and may be used for protecting a variety of information. There are three levels of classification defined in terms of level of damage -- CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET and TOP SECRET. However, there are many different levels of special handling. FOUO is a special handling caveat, specifically, a type of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). And now I feel like I've worked on my day off... *shakes tiny fist* I'm counting your post as quarterly security training. Me too |
||
| XplodedSynapses i hope they used a cover sheet. |
||
| ramblinwreck
Evil Twin Skippy: Iceman_Cometh: EZ Writer: *adjusts Command Security Manager hat* Ahem... FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO): applies to unclassified information that is exempt from mandatory release to the public under Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and may be used for protecting a variety of information. There are three levels of classification defined in terms of level of damage -- CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET and TOP SECRET. However, there are many different levels of special handling. FOUO is a special handling caveat, specifically, a type of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). And now I feel like I've worked on my day off... *shakes tiny fist* I'm counting your post as quarterly security training. Me too Three? Thanks Security Manager ;) |
||
| BitwiseShift
Use of this memo as toilet paper is discouraged unless it is an official evacuation. |
||
| Snotnose A few years back my company sent out a memo reminding us that things marked "company confidential" should not be taken home, and should be disposed of in the shredder. I sent mail pointing out that everything was marked 'company confidential', including the cafeteria menus. Never heard back, and the menus were still confidential for the 2 years I remained with the company. |
||
| demaL-demaL-yeH *Ctl-F "unclassified"* 13 matches. *whistles nonchalantly and leaves* |
||
| indarwinsshadow
I'm curious to what the problem with the ammo is. Is it tolerances in manufacturing (porosity in the material) or improper balance, or is it a problem with the weapons not producing enough spin to accurately fire the round downrange or? |
||
| Tanthalas39
No irony police douchebags yet? *checks watch* |
||
| Tourney3p0
My timesheet at work is stamped FOUO. There are a lot of articles lately that are only IRONIC, AMUSING, etc if you lack even a basic understanding of what's going on. |
||
| dramboxf I had a buddy that used to work for the NSA. He told hilarious stories over things that were classified Top Secret and TS/SCI. I think my favorite is that it's TS/SCI @ NSA for the POs for toilet paper. That's right -- according to my buddy, they created a Special Compartmented Intelligence classification for the # of toilet paper rolls they purchase. (This was 1994, btw.) I asked, "WTF?" He told me that he asked his Security Officer about it, and the SO told him that it was a hold over from the Cold War. Someone got the idea that the Rooskies might be able to reverse calculate how many people worked @ NSA based on how much TP they went through, and at that time, the # of people working @ NSA was considered Vital National Security Information. Probably BS. Probably like the Dominos/Pentagon thing. Still a funny story. |
||
| Showing 1-18 of 18 comments | ||
| Refresh | ||
| This thread is closed to new comments. |
close