(full site)
Fark.com

Try out our new mobile site!


Back To Main
   The Associated Press decides made-up words are made-up, so don't look for the following in AP stories, "ethnic cleansing" , "homophobia,"' "Islamophobia and "undocumented immigrants"

26 Nov 2012 10:39 PM   |   7137 clicks   |   The Atlantic Wire
Showing 1-50 of 216 comments
Refresh Page 2
View Comments:
impaler    [TotalFark]  
The AP has phobiaphobia.

26 Nov 2012 08:15 PM
Three Crooked Squirrels    [TotalFark]  
Well, "undocumented immigrants" doesn't appear in the article (unless I missed it). But I have a problem with that, too. The right's use of "illegals" makes me cringe, as it is a clear attempt to dehumanize. The left's use of "undocumented immigrant" also bothers me, as they are more than undocumented, they are here illegally. Call them "illegal immigrants". It's what they are without connotation. Then fix the farking problem.

26 Nov 2012 08:43 PM
AdolfOliverPanties     
All words are made-up.


/the brain named itself

26 Nov 2012 08:46 PM
impaler    [TotalFark]  

AdolfOliverPanties: All words are made-up.


/the brain named itself


My brain would have called the brain "head kidney."

26 Nov 2012 08:56 PM
namatad    [TotalFark]  

impaler: AdolfOliverPanties: All words are made-up.

/the brain named itself

My brain would have called the brain "head kidney."


mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm butter

and subby, I dont think you know what the word "spiffy" means. You were looking for retarded or stupid or silly. Spiffy is for "cool"ish things, not moronic decisions.

26 Nov 2012 09:37 PM
RoyBatty     
This could be a good thing.

I think they are mostly right to stop using medical/psychological words to label behaviors when they are not doctors or psychologists. I wonder what they will replace "ethnic cleansing" with, or what they would now call "enhanced interrogation techniques".

Ethnic cleansing seems to describe something more than "pretty violent activities" and also something that can be much less than a genocide.

26 Nov 2012 09:55 PM
Snarfangel     
We are all embiggened by their example.

26 Nov 2012 09:57 PM
Lsherm    [TotalFark]  

Three Crooked Squirrels: Well, "undocumented immigrants" doesn't appear in the article (unless I missed it). But I have a problem with that, too. The right's use of "illegals" makes me cringe, as it is a clear attempt to dehumanize. The left's use of "undocumented immigrant" also bothers me, as they are more than undocumented, they are here illegally. Call them "illegal immigrants". It's what they are without connotation. Then fix the farking problem.


"Undocumented immigrants" is a bullshiat term because it implies the legality of the immigrant is simply a matter of paperwork, and it's not. If they were actually documented, most of them wouldn't be immigrants anymore, because they'd be deported. Why? Because they are here illegally.

That said, I'm an amnesty supporter.

26 Nov 2012 10:01 PM
ThatGuyFromTheInternet     

impaler: AdolfOliverPanties: All words are made-up.


/the brain named itself

My brain would have called the brain "head kidney."


Now that's using your bean.

26 Nov 2012 10:01 PM
Lsherm    [TotalFark]  

RoyBatty: Ethnic cleansing seems to describe something more than "pretty violent activities" and also something that can be much less than a genocide.


Just call it mass-murder based on ethnic criteria, then attribute a number to it.

26 Nov 2012 10:03 PM
RoyBatty     

Lsherm: RoyBatty: Ethnic cleansing seems to describe something more than "pretty violent activities" and also something that can be much less than a genocide.

Just call it mass-murder based on ethnic criteria, then attribute a number to it.


But according to the wiki, for instance, it might not involve mass murder. Link

It might not involve murder at all, and conceivably might be conducted using entirely legal means.

26 Nov 2012 10:19 PM
Lsherm    [TotalFark]  

RoyBatty: Lsherm: RoyBatty: Ethnic cleansing seems to describe something more than "pretty violent activities" and also something that can be much less than a genocide.

Just call it mass-murder based on ethnic criteria, then attribute a number to it.

But according to the wiki, for instance, it might not involve mass murder. Link

It might not involve murder at all, and conceivably might be conducted using entirely legal means.


Well then, call it what it is. Doesn't this prove AP's point, that the term is too vague for use in a news story?

26 Nov 2012 10:22 PM
RoyBatty     

Lsherm: RoyBatty: Lsherm: RoyBatty: Ethnic cleansing seems to describe something more than "pretty violent activities" and also something that can be much less than a genocide.

Just call it mass-murder based on ethnic criteria, then attribute a number to it.

But according to the wiki, for instance, it might not involve mass murder. Link

It might not involve murder at all, and conceivably might be conducted using entirely legal means.

Well then, call it what it is. Doesn't this prove AP's point, that the term is too vague for use in a news story?


Maybe, though again, the wiki says academics find it useful.

I have no idea -- it will be interesting to see how it is replaced.

26 Nov 2012 10:26 PM
thisiszombocom     
teahadi still ok??

26 Nov 2012 10:41 PM
skinink     
Those words are fine to use, irregardless of what the AP says.

26 Nov 2012 10:42 PM
Hobodeluxe     
Newspeak doubleplusungood.

*jedi hand wave*

These are not the human and civil rights issues you're looking for
might I suggest War on Christmas?

26 Nov 2012 10:43 PM
Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom     
If only removing actual undocumented immigrants were as easy.

26 Nov 2012 10:44 PM
Fano     

skinink: Those words are fine to use, irregardless of what the AP says.


Perfectly cromulent

26 Nov 2012 10:44 PM
Gyrfalcon    [TotalFark]  
By all means, let's argue about the words, and not focus on what's actually going on. It's a much better use of our time and energy.

Things have been so much better since we began calling those people with low IQs "developmentally challeneged" and not "retards", amirite? Think how much better off we'll be when we refer to those who irrationally hate homosexuals as "anti-gay" and not "homophobes".

26 Nov 2012 10:46 PM
Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom     
For all your ethnic cleansing needs:

www.tropicalzone.chView Full Size

26 Nov 2012 10:47 PM
duffblue     
I think everything intelligent that needs to be said has already been said, so I'm just dropping in to say hello!

26 Nov 2012 10:49 PM
Ego edo infantia cattus     
francisanderson.files.wordpress.comView Full Size

www.sohitek.coView Full Size

26 Nov 2012 10:50 PM
LDM90     
Homophobia IS a pretty stupid word.

26 Nov 2012 10:50 PM
Bonanza Jellybean     
Fine, but what happens when the "anti-gay" folks demand to be identified as "pro-traditional families" or some shiat? Just like pro-life/anti-choice, there's already an inherent bias in how you brand a group or an individual. Writing around what they are doesn't inform anyone. You might as well just do away with all descriptors and adjectives altogether.

26 Nov 2012 10:51 PM
RoyHobbs22     
R.I.P.

Santa Claus and Jesus Christ

26 Nov 2012 10:52 PM
skullkrusher     

LDM90: Homophobia IS a pretty stupid word.


you sound homophobiaphobic

26 Nov 2012 10:53 PM
gadian     
Homophobia suggests fear. My own experiences with those that would be called Homophobes aren't afraid of gays or catching the ghey, it's an unwarranted and irrational sense of revulsion combined with the pathological need to be able to try and hurt those "beneath" them. I think psychopath is probably a better term for a homophobe.

not the same as a homophone, either, which is what firefox spell check is telling me to use.

26 Nov 2012 10:53 PM
Ima4nic8or     
I agree with LDM90. homopobia is one of the gayest words ever. The first time I heard it I thought "now why would humans be afraid of other humans in general."

26 Nov 2012 10:53 PM
Smackledorfer     

Three Crooked Squirrels: Well, "undocumented immigrants" doesn't appear in the article (unless I missed it). But I have a problem with that, too. The right's use of "illegals" makes me cringe, as it is a clear attempt to dehumanize. The left's use of "undocumented immigrant" also bothers me, as they are more than undocumented, they are here illegally. Call them "illegal immigrants". It's what they are without connotation. Then fix the farking problem.


Im liberal, vote democrat for the most part, and would be fine with open borders.

There is nothing wrong with the term illegal alien. Illegal immigrant rules out illegal non-immigrants and is too specific. Illegal for short is fine and doesn't bother me.

26 Nov 2012 10:54 PM
Philbb    [TotalFark]  

AdolfOliverPanties: All words are made-up.


Does it still count as "made-up" when the words originate from God?

26 Nov 2012 10:54 PM
Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom     

Smackledorfer: Three Crooked Squirrels: Well, "undocumented immigrants" doesn't appear in the article (unless I missed it). But I have a problem with that, too. The right's use of "illegals" makes me cringe, as it is a clear attempt to dehumanize. The left's use of "undocumented immigrant" also bothers me, as they are more than undocumented, they are here illegally. Call them "illegal immigrants". It's what they are without connotation. Then fix the farking problem.

Im liberal, vote democrat for the most part, and would be fine with open borders.

There is nothing wrong with the term illegal alien. Illegal immigrant rules out illegal non-immigrants and is too specific. Illegal for short is fine and doesn't bother me.


I never understood what was so bad about "Mexicans" in the first place.

26 Nov 2012 10:55 PM
Curse of the Goth Kids     
Wasn't "ethnic cleansing" a euphemism employed by the Bosnian Serbs to make their genocidal activities sound more palatable in some kind of bizarre way? It's since become as much of a pejorative as the word genocide itself, but I can agree that it probably ought not be used by reporters.

26 Nov 2012 10:55 PM
Smackledorfer     

gadian: Homophobia suggests fear. My own experiences with those that would be called Homophobes aren't afraid of gays or catching the ghey, it's an unwarranted and irrational sense of revulsion combined with the pathological need to be able to try and hurt those "beneath" them. I think psychopath is probably a better term for a homophobe.

not the same as a homophone, either, which is what firefox spell check is telling me to use.


fear of those who are different and/or what allowing them to live in society as they want is what leads to the irrational anger.

26 Nov 2012 10:56 PM
diaphoresis     

skinink: Those words are fine to use, irregardless of what the AP says.


i0.kym-cdn.comView Full Size

26 Nov 2012 10:57 PM
HotWingAgenda    [TotalFark]  

Three Crooked Squirrels: Well, "undocumented immigrants" doesn't appear in the article (unless I missed it). But I have a problem with that, too. The right's use of "illegals" makes me cringe, as it is a clear attempt to dehumanize. The left's use of "undocumented immigrant" also bothers me, as they are more than undocumented, they are here illegally. Call them "illegal immigrants". It's what they are without connotation. Then fix the farking problem.


The correct term is illegal alien. A foreigner is just someone who is a citizen of another state within the same country. Immigrant suggests that they have already forfeited their original citizenship in their nation of origin.

By specifying illegal aliens (the term for someone who is a citizen of another sovereign nation, illegally trespassing in another nation), you avoid confusion and look less ignorant.

26 Nov 2012 10:57 PM
meanmutton     

Hobodeluxe: Newspeak doubleplusungood.

*jedi hand wave*

These are not the human and civil rights issues you're looking for
might I suggest War on Christmas?


Except that the AP is eliminating the Newspeak terms. The "-phobia" for bigots is a stupid development that doesn't adequately describe individuals. Anti-Islamic bigot is a much more accurate and useful term than Islamophobic. The term "undocumented immigrant", likewise, is an attempt at a euphemistic treadmill, sacrificing a term that some people find offensive with an less exact term that's "nicer".

26 Nov 2012 10:59 PM
Hilary T. N. Seuss     
Good. "Homo" = same, "phobia" = fear. Thus "homophobia" = fear of sameness. That makes no damn sense, unless it's about some lady who was afraid someone else would show up at a party wearing the same dress as her. I look forward to seeing this meaningless term pass away into history.

26 Nov 2012 10:59 PM
RoyBatty     

Smackledorfer: Three Crooked Squirrels: Well, "undocumented immigrants" doesn't appear in the article (unless I missed it). But I have a problem with that, too. The right's use of "illegals" makes me cringe, as it is a clear attempt to dehumanize. The left's use of "undocumented immigrant" also bothers me, as they are more than undocumented, they are here illegally. Call them "illegal immigrants". It's what they are without connotation. Then fix the farking problem.

Im liberal, vote democrat for the most part, and would be fine with open borders.

There is nothing wrong with the term illegal alien. Illegal immigrant rules out illegal non-immigrants and is too specific. Illegal for short is fine and doesn't bother me.


Not to derail or threadjack this, but are in favor of a strong safety net too?

Who said this:

Open immigration can't coexist with a strong social safety net; if you're going to assure health care and a decent income to everyone, you can't make that offer global.

Paul Krugman or Milton Friedman?

26 Nov 2012 11:01 PM
The Face Of Oblivion     
If your chosen term manages to offend at least 2 groups of people, it is appropriate.

26 Nov 2012 11:01 PM
FitzShivering     
Wait til they hear about the phrase "civil war".

26 Nov 2012 11:02 PM
whither_apophis     

impaler: The AP has phobiaphobia.


Maybe they have pantaphobia. Do you think they have pantaphobia?

26 Nov 2012 11:02 PM
meanmutton     

Bonanza Jellybean: Fine, but what happens when the "anti-gay" folks demand to be identified as "pro-traditional families" or some shiat? Just like pro-life/anti-choice, there's already an inherent bias in how you brand a group or an individual. Writing around what they are doesn't inform anyone. You might as well just do away with all descriptors and adjectives altogether.


The comparison with abortion isn't an accurate one because, frankly, terms used for the sides in the abortion debate are actually rather accurate in describing their position: the pro-life side believes that a fetus has the same moral worth as any born human and has an entitled right to life; the pro-choice side believes that a fetus is merely a group of cells and it's perfectly legitimate for the mother to choose how she deals with the bunch of cells within her body and no one else's business.

26 Nov 2012 11:03 PM
Ima4nic8or     
I also applaud the abandonment of "undocumented workers". That is a euphemism that is as bad as "pre-titled car" or "specially-abled." Call them what they are, either "illegal immigrants" or if two words are too much for you, "illegals."

While they are not all evil folks who should be treated as such they did in fact break the law and should pay the consequences for that action. Yes, I know, some came here as kids. Even they technically commited a crime by staying here after they turned 18 (they age at which they become an adult responsible for their own action and thus accountable for being here illegally). This is of course a minor crime which should be forgiven if they serve in the military or complete college in the US (on their own dime). As for the adults who come here illegally they should all be deported immediately, do not pass go, do not collect free benefits. They broke into an occupied country, no different from a person that breaks into an occupied home in the dead of night.

26 Nov 2012 11:03 PM
Hector Remarkable    [TotalFark]  
Bleebsnort.

26 Nov 2012 11:04 PM
Lsherm    [TotalFark]  

Smackledorfer: Illegal immigrant rules out illegal non-immigrants


Now I'm curious: what is an illegal non-immigrant? Someone who lost their citizenship?

26 Nov 2012 11:04 PM
meanmutton     

Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: Smackledorfer: Three Crooked Squirrels: Well, "undocumented immigrants" doesn't appear in the article (unless I missed it). But I have a problem with that, too. The right's use of "illegals" makes me cringe, as it is a clear attempt to dehumanize. The left's use of "undocumented immigrant" also bothers me, as they are more than undocumented, they are here illegally. Call them "illegal immigrants". It's what they are without connotation. Then fix the farking problem.

Im liberal, vote democrat for the most part, and would be fine with open borders.

There is nothing wrong with the term illegal alien. Illegal immigrant rules out illegal non-immigrants and is too specific. Illegal for short is fine and doesn't bother me.

I never understood what was so bad about "Mexicans" in the first place.


You know the answer, of course, but you're either a bigot yourself or trying to make a self-congratulatory point: Because there are individuals who are legitimately bothered by illegal immigration regardless of country of origin who don't care about legal immigrants.

26 Nov 2012 11:04 PM
Amos Quito     

Lsherm: Three Crooked Squirrels: Well, "undocumented immigrants" doesn't appear in the article (unless I missed it). But I have a problem with that, too. The right's use of "illegals" makes me cringe, as it is a clear attempt to dehumanize. The left's use of "undocumented immigrant" also bothers me, as they are more than undocumented, they are here illegally. Call them "illegal immigrants". It's what they are without connotation. Then fix the farking problem.

"Undocumented immigrants" is a bullshiat term because it implies the legality of the immigrant is simply a matter of paperwork, and it's not. If they were actually documented, most of them wouldn't be immigrants anymore, because they'd be deported. Why? Because they are here illegally.

That said, I'm an amnesty supporter.



You sound confused.

26 Nov 2012 11:05 PM
Dear Jerk     
The AP Stylebook is a good example of journalists taking the bias out of news reporting. A lot of thought goes into it. It's worth reading if you are someone who doesn't hate words.

26 Nov 2012 11:05 PM
odenen     
The AP = Anti-Phobia.

26 Nov 2012 11:05 PM
Surool     
Homophobia is never used correctly anyway. These people hate gays... this isn't fear, it is hatred. I know it's fun to brand these bigoted sh*tbags as being afraid of gays, but when you do that, you fail at understanding the enemy. I believe some of the bigots are afraid, but I think most are filled with a (frequently religious) programmed hatred. So anti-gay is actually a better description.

26 Nov 2012 11:05 PM
Showing 1-50 of 216 comments
Refresh Page 2
View Comments:
This thread is closed to new comments.


Back To Main

More Headlines:
Main | Sports | Business | Geek | Entertainment | Politics | Video | FarkUs | Contests | Fark Party | Combined