| Fark-ready headline: Ontario school using stickers to cover student's genitals in yearbook |
||
| Add Comment | ||
| Showing 1-42 of 42 comments | ||
| Refresh | ||
| TsarTom In a photo of the school's news team, one student unzipped his pants, putting his testicles on display for the camera. That kid's nuts. |
||
| Chariset Scratch and sniff? |
||
cretinbob |
||
| LordOfThePings
Unfortunately, these were the stickers available. |
||
| publikenemy
OMG some balls! Nuns should realize that even THEY were in someone's ballsack at one time |
||
| crabsno termites
BALLS TO THE WALL! |
||
| AverageAmericanGuy
Heh. Canadians. |
||
| fusillade762 Students who already received a yearbook can get a sticker to put over the image if they wish, Boles said. Any bets on how many students take them up on this offer? And, heh heh heh, "Boles". |
||
| boguzoid
I'm guessing the photographer saw the dude pull his sack out and said "I should totally run with this". Any publicity is good publicity as long as you're not the one showing off the bat-wing. |
||
| HotWingAgenda
What kind of sick freak puts stickers on a student's genitals? And then takes a picture of it and adds that to a yearbook? |
||
bearded clamorer ![]() Ouch |
||
| Robo Beat
Not impressed: ![]() /of course I'm not going to post the full image |
||
| Hilary T. N. Seuss
What a coNUNdrum. |
||
| sexorcisst
|
||
| Kevin72
This could happen in Ontario, Canada. If it was Ontario, California there would be lawsuits, arrests, and all yearbooks destroyed because the scrotum in question was under 18. |
||
| Ghastly Meh. My wrestling coach used to put much worse over my genitals back in highschool. |
||
| Gyrfalcon Kevin72: This could happen in Ontario, Canada. If it was Ontario, California there would be lawsuits, arrests, and all yearbooks destroyed because the scrotum in question was under 18. Under 18 what? |
||
| Mock26
A bunch of losers at my high school formed a "fraternity" which they simply called, "The Frat." For my senior year class photo all the members of The Frat wore a blue sports jacket, and they all crossed their arms in front of their chest and extended one middle finger. This went unnoticed until the photos were printed. When it was discovered the phone calls started flying and a bunch of parents demanded that the picture be retaken and that they not have to pay for it. The school went one better and said that the new photos, including the cost of bringing the photographer back, would be covered by every student who gave the finger. When some of their parents complained the school point blank said that if they did not pay their fair share that the student would be excluded from the picture and would not be allowed to attend graduation. Most of the parents complained some more, but the school stood firm. All the parents of The Frat losers quickly coughed up the money. Well, that is not entirely true. I know for a fact that some parents made their children pay for it, and one parent even made his son sell his Atari console and cartridges to cover the cost! |
||
| HotWingAgenda
Mock26: made his son sell his Atari console and cartridges Was he still allowed to drive his brand new Model-T to homecoming? |
||
| sexorcisst
boguzoid: I'm guessing the photographer saw the dude pull his sack out and said "I should |
||
| Big Ramifications
The unrelated picture next to the article summed up my thoughts perfectly. ![]() See also: In May of 2000, it was reported in the local paper that thirty-four students who had attended Hanover High School in Pennsylvania had had their pictures taken for the school yearbook giving an obscene gesture. The principal, John P. Cokefair, had sent a letter to the thirty-four students' parents explaining that because of the preponderance of this gesture in the photos, the offending photos would be re-taken, without the gesturing students, and these students would bear the cost of the re-shoot. |
||
| KrispyKritter children pranking memory photo books is one of the better things in life. i pity you farkers who cannot see that and enjoy the delicious silliness of youth. what miserable bastards you must be. a/k/a Lighten up, Francis |
||
| Day_Old_Dutchie
publikenemy: OMG some balls! Nuns should realize that even THEY were in someone's ballsack at one time GOD HATES SEX. He really does. He doesn't want you to do it any more than absolutely necessary to reproduce. Not for pleasure at all. If you enjoy it at all you will GO TO HELL and he has a whole army of tightasses who are more than eager to help him. |
||
| BowtoMogul
My senior year in high school, the V-Soccer team decided to take our team photo sans pants (the pic was taken outside so there was a little more fun walking around the fields in our boxers while the photog found a good spot for us) The yearbook adviser heard of what we did. She yelled at us for some time and made us have another picture taken in the gym on the bleachers. By then it was almost time to leave for a game so we were all wearing our game shorts. Most of us pulled our balls out of our shorts and let them hang for the new photo. We're not sure what happened next, but when the book was printed the original photo, sans pants was printed. Myself I always assumed she just admitted defeat. /csb |
||
| Phil Moskowitz
This story is truly befitting this city. Goes with our motto. Welcome to London, we're very genitals to meet you. |
||
| BoxOfBees
Day_Old_Dutchie: publikenemy: OMG some balls! Nuns should realize that even THEY were in someone's ballsack at one time GOD HATES SEX. He really does. He doesn't want you to do it any more than absolutely necessary to reproduce. Not for pleasure at all. If you enjoy it at all you will GO TO HELL and he has a whole army of tightasses who are more than eager to help him. Taking your balls out for a yearbook photo = sex? If this is how you derive pleasure, at least we can take comfort in the fact that you won't be reproducing and contaminating the gene pool. |
||
| abhorrent1
So are all 1300 students that got it, their parents and school administrators being arrested for possession and/or distribution of CP? |
||
| Onkel Buck
At least they didnt make them put hot sauce on their genitals |
||
| assjuice
HotWingAgenda: Mock26: made his son sell his Atari console and cartridges Was he still allowed to drive his brand new Model-T to homecoming? Wow, you are so young. Congratulations on this achievement. Hopefully you don't grow old. |
||
badscooter
![]() |
||
| Harry Freakstorm Johnson, that's a pretty big wang to slip through Woody's editorial review. I think we should consult with Peter to see what we should do. I'll wanker that we'll have to crotch a reshoot or dick up a sticker that will cover that danglie. Oh and penis. |
||
| justneal
makes me very proud? to be from london |
||
| Mega Steve
crabsno termites: BALLS TO THE WALL! Was midget metal big in Germany? I don't think it really caught on in the U.S. |
||
| Phil Moskowitz
justneal: makes me very proud? to be from london Did you catch the London City Danglers last weekend? They put on quite a show. |
||
| PrawnSolo
Good old Londong |
||
| Gabrielmot
hahaha... I'm laughing because a similar thing happened with the cheerleaders in my high school. I went to turn the page in my yearbook and felt something weird on the paper, I looked down and noticed there was a sticker over part of one of the pictures. I figured it must be some trash from the book making process or something, and pulled it off. Turns out apparently one of the yearbook staff managed to sneak in a bunch of pictures like this on purpose and it was only caught after printing. There wasn't anything x-rated (or there might have been, the picture quality was so low in the book if there was, we couldn't tell), just some panty shots (nothing worse than if they had been on the beach in a bikini). What really got me is that they expected to send out hundreds of these and no one would notice. The stickers they used didn't stick very well, so they were easily taken off without destroying the paper. I'll point out that while word of this spread like wildfire... no one got sued (odd here in America). |
||
| FTDA
Gyrfalcon: Kevin72: This could happen in Ontario, Canada. If it was Ontario, California there would be lawsuits, arrests, and all yearbooks destroyed because the scrotum in question was under 18. Under 18 what? Centimeters, damn metric system! |
||
| Kevin72
FTDA: Gyrfalcon: Kevin72: This could happen in Ontario, Canada. If it was Ontario, California there would be lawsuits, arrests, and all yearbooks destroyed because the scrotum in question was under 18. Under 18 what? Centimeters, damn metric system! Actually, under 18 years old (metric system). |
||
| FTDA
That whooshing sound you're hearing is my joke buzzing the tower. |
||
| Balchinian
In my yearbook there is a photo of the principal and the golf team (he also coached the team). In that picture I am standing next to him with my hand on his shoulder, with my middle finger proudly extended right next to his head. I never heard a word about it from anyone at the school, but that was way before people were so uptight about that sort of thing. Hell, there are photos of underage students openly drinking beer at lunch in my yearbooks now that I think about it. |
||
| DiRF
badscooter: [i.imgur.com image 600x460] Can't believe it took them so long to realize that that wasn't Bonnett's ear. |
||
| ranev700
Harry Freakstorm: Johnson, that's a pretty big wang to slip through Woody's editorial review. I think we should consult with Peter to see what we should do. I'll wanker that we'll have to crotch a reshoot or dick up a sticker that will cover that danglie. It'll be hard on us, but we can't lick it by being soft. |
||
| Showing 1-42 of 42 comments | ||
| Refresh | ||
| This thread is closed to new comments. |
close