(full site)
Fark.com

Try out our new mobile site!


Back To Main
   News: Dad points AK-47 at daughter for getting two B's instead of straight A's on her report card. Fark: He just bought the AK-47 because he feared the gub'mint would ban them

25 Jan 2013 04:09 PM   |   14896 clicks   |   MyFox Twin Cities
Showing 1-50 of 491 comments
Refresh Page 2
View Comments:
Pocket Ninja    [TotalFark]  
Well, if the daughter (and the mom) had been carrying their own guns, this wouldn't have happened, now would it? He probably only felt empowered to do this because he knew they WEREN'T armed and were therefore easy victims. Remember: an armed society is a polite society. I'm glad we can have situations like this crop up every now and then to serve as just illustrations of that very important point.

25 Jan 2013 02:14 PM
Sybarite    [TotalFark]  
Asian dad?

Kirill Bartashevitch

Hm, nope.

25 Jan 2013 02:14 PM
gopher321    [TotalFark]  
I get the felling this 'Murikin fears a lot of things.

25 Jan 2013 02:17 PM
Blues_X    [TotalFark]  
You can get an AK for just $150?

25 Jan 2013 02:17 PM
Apos     
Which means that if she had received a few C's or lower, he would have blown her away.

FOTY material, for sure.

25 Jan 2013 02:22 PM
ajgeek    [TotalFark]  

Sybarite: Asian dad?

Kirill Bartashevitch

Hm, nope.


Asian REDNECK dad. It's the only explanation.

25 Jan 2013 02:25 PM
SilentStrider    [TotalFark]  

ajgeek: Sybarite: Asian dad?

Kirill Bartashevitch

Hm, nope.

Asian REDNECK dad. It's the only explanation.


Name sounds Russian, so he's not a redneck, he's just red.


/aisle seat please.

25 Jan 2013 02:26 PM
Lionel Mandrake    [TotalFark]  
Watch the libbies try to punish this patriot for using second amendment solutions to raise his kids.

25 Jan 2013 02:28 PM
Amos Quito     
Fool.

He could have pointed a shotgun or a pistol, but no, it had to be an ASSAULT WEAPON, and now he's on Fark.

25 Jan 2013 02:29 PM
Because People in power are Stupid     
She got two B's? She's just starting to fill out.

25 Jan 2013 02:31 PM
Amos Quito     

Lionel Mandrake: Watch the libbies try to punish this patriot for using second amendment solutions to raise his kids.



images2.opticsplanet.comView Full Size


What a "Second Amendment Solution" might look like

25 Jan 2013 02:33 PM
Nadie_AZ    [TotalFark]  
SilentStrider: ajgeek: Sybarite: Asian dad?

Kirill Bartashevitch

Hm, nope.

Asian REDNECK dad. It's the only explanation.

Name sounds Russian, so he's not a redneck, he's just red.


Better dead than red!

/death is a preferable alternative ...

25 Jan 2013 02:34 PM
Amos Quito     

Because People in power are Stupid: She got two B's? She's just starting to fill out.



Heh!

No wonder daddy's nervous.

25 Jan 2013 02:34 PM
vpb    [TotalFark]  

Blues_X: You can get an AK for just $150?


7.62x54R is a type of ammunition.

I think he paid $375 for the AK.

25 Jan 2013 02:36 PM
Donnchadha    [TotalFark]  
Gun Owners of PeaceTM strike again

25 Jan 2013 02:37 PM
timujin    [TotalFark]  

Sybarite: Asian dad?

Kirill Bartashevitch

Hm, nope.


Bartashevitch could be an Asian name.

25 Jan 2013 02:41 PM
impaler     
Bartashevitch admitted having a physical confrontation with his wife and daughter, and admitted to pointing the gun at both of them. He said the gun was not loaded and that he checked the chamber before pointing it at them.

You know, if we needed to at least pass a licensing exam to get weapon, like we do a car, these guy would know that:
1) A gun is ALWAYS loaded.
2) See # 1
3) Did you see #1 yet? If not, see #1

25 Jan 2013 02:41 PM
ManateeGag    [TotalFark]  
this is why we can't have nice things.

25 Jan 2013 02:43 PM
Mugato    [TotalFark]  
"terroristic"? Didn't even know that was a word.

Was that really terrorism though? Oh right. Everything is terrorism now.

25 Jan 2013 02:43 PM
Nadie_AZ    [TotalFark]  

impaler: Bartashevitch admitted having a physical confrontation with his wife and daughter, and admitted to pointing the gun at both of them. He said the gun was not loaded and that he checked the chamber before pointing it at them.

You know, if we needed to at least pass a licensing exam to get weapon, like we do a car, these guy would know that:
1) A gun is ALWAYS loaded.
2) See # 1
3) Did you see #1 yet? If not, see #1


Thank you. This can't be stated enough. And don't ever point it at anything you aren't willing to destroy.

25 Jan 2013 02:44 PM
vpb    [TotalFark]  

Mugato: "terroristic"? Didn't even know that was a word.

Was that really terrorism though? Oh right. Everything is terrorism now.


Threatening to kill someone is a terroristic threat.

25 Jan 2013 02:45 PM
The Stealth Hippopotamus    [TotalFark]  

impaler: You know, if we needed to at least pass a licensing exam to get weapon, like we do a car, these guy would know that:
1) A gun is ALWAYS loaded.
2) See # 1
3) Did you see #1 yet? If not, see #1



4) Do you still want to point the gun at someone just to scare them? Don't cause it could be loaded


However a license does not mean that you will get responsible ownership. See car ownership.


img685.imageshack.usView Full Size

25 Jan 2013 02:50 PM
MaudlinMutantMollusk    [TotalFark]  
Never use an AK on a teenager

/that's what shotguns are for

25 Jan 2013 02:50 PM
jchic    [TotalFark]  

impaler: Bartashevitch admitted having a physical confrontation with his wife and daughter, and admitted to pointing the gun at both of them. He said the gun was not loaded and that he checked the chamber before pointing it at them.

You know, if we needed to at least pass a licensing exam to get weapon, like we do a car, these guy would know that:
1) A gun is ALWAYS loaded.
2) See # 1
3) Did you see #1 yet? If not, see #1


So.  He grabbed his gun during an argument, and made sure it was not loaded (yes, I know they're all loaded, bear with me) and then pointed it at his wife and daughter?  What exactly was the point he was trying to make?  The whole reason a gun exists is to shoot something so if you make sure that that gun can't shoot, what, exactly, are you trying to convey by pointing an unloaded gun at someone?  If you get one more B I'll load this gun and then shoot you?

25 Jan 2013 02:53 PM
rev. dave     

MaudlinMutantMollusk: Never use an AK on a teenager

/that's what shotguns are for


I thought shotguns were used to force the guy who knocked her up to marry her.

25 Jan 2013 02:53 PM
Coco LaFemme     
This here is a fine example of someone who is too stupid to own a firearm.  Bought the gun because he thought the "gub'mint" was going to ban it, and pointed it in his daughter's face for bringing home two B's instead of straight A's.

Take THAT man's gun and beat him upside the head with it......then don't give it back.

25 Jan 2013 02:53 PM
muck4doo     

The Stealth Hippopotamus: impaler: You know, if we needed to at least pass a licensing exam to get weapon, like we do a car, these guy would know that:
1) A gun is ALWAYS loaded.
2) See # 1
3) Did you see #1 yet? If not, see #1


4) Do you still want to point the gun at someone just to scare them? Don't cause it could be loaded


However a license does not mean that you will get responsible ownership. See car ownership.


[img685.imageshack.us image 475x307]


LOL! She must have got lessons from my ex. All she needs is some fast food in her left hand.

25 Jan 2013 02:53 PM
Amos Quito     

Mugato: "terroristic"? Didn't even know that was a word.

Was that really terrorism though? Oh right. Everything is terrorism now.



Terrorism is the new black.

25 Jan 2013 02:54 PM
muck4doo     

Coco LaFemme: This here is a fine example of someone who is too stupid to own a firearm.  Bought the gun because he thought the "gub'mint" was going to ban it, and pointed it in his daughter's face for bringing home two B's instead of straight A's.

Take THAT man's gun and beat him upside the head with it......then don't give it back.


Something tells me he wasn't a straight A student either.

25 Jan 2013 02:55 PM
BronyMedic     

MaudlinMutantMollusk: Never use an AK on a teenager

/that's what shotguns are for


You know, Rock Salt won't really kill you, but it'll sure act as an effective behavioral modifier.

At any rate, and in all seriousness, this is insane. What responsible gun owner, let alone decent human parent, would threaten their OWN CHILD with a rifle. Period. At the very least, it's the basic definition of emotional abuse, and probably an indicator that something else non-kosher is going on in the house.

People like this need to be beat upside the head (Sorry, your rights end where my nose begins logic on this one. You do not have the right to threaten a CHILD with a rifle because of their freakin' report card) and be mandated to seek mental health evaluation and care.

25 Jan 2013 02:56 PM
Diogenes    [TotalFark]  
He said the gun was not loaded and that he checked the chamber before pointing it at them.

As we are all likely to do during a heated, physical exchange.

25 Jan 2013 02:56 PM
Amos Quito     

BronyMedic: At any rate, and in all seriousness, this is insane. What responsible gun owner, let alone decent human parent, would threaten their OWN CHILD with a rifle. Period. At the very least, it's the basic definition of emotional abuse, and probably an indicator that something else non-kosher is going on in the house.



You think he's been porking his daughter?

25 Jan 2013 03:00 PM
BunkoSquad    [TotalFark]  
This society just keeps getting more and more polite, doesn't it?

25 Jan 2013 03:02 PM
muck4doo     

BunkoSquad: This society just keeps getting more and more polite, doesn't it?


fark you

25 Jan 2013 03:03 PM
vpb    [TotalFark]  
The Stealth Hippopotamus:

However a license does not mean that you will get responsible ownership. See car ownership.


That's why we need to limit the firepower.

25 Jan 2013 03:03 PM
thismomentinblackhistory     
Not all gun related products are bad.

www.desertknightnews.comView Full Size

25 Jan 2013 03:09 PM
BronyMedic     

Amos Quito: You think he's been porking his daughter?


Okay. That made me laugh. Bravo, Sir. Bravo.

In all seriousness, coming from someone who sees a lot of abused kids come through, if that dad is willing to threaten his daughter at gunpoint for something, he's willing and probably in the current act of harming her in some other fashion, physically or emotionally. It's not really a stretch to assume or intervene with an investigation.

/wonder how many "falls" she's had in the last 5 years.

25 Jan 2013 03:13 PM
The Stealth Hippopotamus    [TotalFark]  

vpb: That's why we need to limit the firepower.

speed.


If no car can go over 20 miles an hour than there would be fewer fatalities. I mean do you really need to go 40 miles an hour?! And while we are at it lets limit the gear ratios on bicycles! We really need to limit those as well. If it will just save one life how could we not?!

25 Jan 2013 03:18 PM
BronyMedic     

The Stealth Hippopotamus: If no car can go over 20 miles an hour than there would be fewer fatalities. I mean do you really need to go 40 miles an hour?! And while we are at it lets limit the gear ratios on bicycles! We really need to limit those as well. If it will just save one life how could we not?!


To be fair, it's a lot harder to get an aortic sheer at 20 miles an hour. Or turn a pedestrian into a buff of pink mist.

25 Jan 2013 03:19 PM
muck4doo     

BronyMedic: The Stealth Hippopotamus: If no car can go over 20 miles an hour than there would be fewer fatalities. I mean do you really need to go 40 miles an hour?! And while we are at it lets limit the gear ratios on bicycles! We really need to limit those as well. If it will just save one life how could we not?!

To be fair, it's a lot harder to get an aortic sheer at 20 miles an hour. Or turn a pedestrian into a buff of pink mist.


A donkey and cart can do the same job as a truck.

25 Jan 2013 03:20 PM
Mugato    [TotalFark]  

The Stealth Hippopotamus: If no car can go over 20 miles an hour than there would be fewer fatalities. I mean do you really need to go 40 miles an hour?!


Yes. Especially in emergencies. More so than we need assault rifles.

/not for gun control
//stupid argument

25 Jan 2013 03:20 PM
muck4doo     

Mugato: The Stealth Hippopotamus: If no car can go over 20 miles an hour than there would be fewer fatalities. I mean do you really need to go 40 miles an hour?!

Yes. Especially in emergencies. More so than we need assault rifles.

/not for gun control
//stupid argument


So government can have them. It's donkey and cart for you.

25 Jan 2013 03:21 PM
BronyMedic     

muck4doo: A donkey and cart can do the same job as a truck.


images3.wikia.nocookie.netView Full Size

25 Jan 2013 03:23 PM
muck4doo     

25 Jan 2013 03:23 PM
vpb    [TotalFark]  

The Stealth Hippopotamus: vpb: That's why we need to limit the firepower.speed.


If no car can go over 20 miles an hour than there would be fewer fatalities. I mean do you really need to go 40 miles an hour?! And while we are at it lets limit the gear ratios on bicycles! We really need to limit those as well. If it will just save one life how could we not?!


We already do regulate cars.  They have to have things like break lights for instance.  Cars manufactured after certain dates must have airbags, anti-lock brakes and such.

We need to regulate guns too.

25 Jan 2013 03:24 PM
Dimensio     

Amos Quito: Fool.

He could have pointed a shotgun or a pistol, but no, it had to be an ASSAULT WEAPON, and now he's on Fark.


Senator Feinstein's proposal classifies many handgun and shotgun models as "assault weapons".

25 Jan 2013 03:26 PM
vpb    [TotalFark]  
muck4doo:

So government can have them. It's donkey and cart for you.

Well, if you are crazy enough to think you are going to overthrow the government or that anyone would want gun nuts to overthrow the government then you probably shouldn't be trusted with a donkey and cart either.

25 Jan 2013 03:26 PM
Diogenes    [TotalFark]  

thismomentinblackhistory: Not all gun related products are bad.

[www.desertknightnews.com image 400x374]


So you say.  I was with someone who was rubbing his piece down with that stuff and the damned thing went off in my face!

25 Jan 2013 03:27 PM
Dimensio     

vpb: The Stealth Hippopotamus: vpb: That's why we need to limit the firepower.speed.


If no car can go over 20 miles an hour than there would be fewer fatalities. I mean do you really need to go 40 miles an hour?! And while we are at it lets limit the gear ratios on bicycles! We really need to limit those as well. If it will just save one life how could we not?!

We already do regulate cars.  They have to have things like break lights for instance.  Cars manufactured after certain dates must have airbags, anti-lock brakes and such.

We need to regulate guns too.


What specific automobile models are banned by name?

25 Jan 2013 03:27 PM
muck4doo     

vpb: muck4doo:

So government can have them. It's donkey and cart for you.

Well, if you are crazy enough to think you are going to overthrow the government or that anyone would want gun nuts to overthrow the government then you probably shouldn't be trusted with a donkey and cart either.


At least I don't think the donkey needs "break lights".

25 Jan 2013 03:30 PM
Showing 1-50 of 491 comments
Refresh Page 2
View Comments:
This thread is closed to new comments.


Back To Main

More Headlines:
Main | Sports | Business | Geek | Entertainment | Politics | Video | FarkUs | Contests | Fark Party | Combined