DavidPontious: First SCOTUS opinion of the day: Patent and Trademark Office v. https://t.co/eLG9v3qs4y B. V. "Held: A term styled "https://t.co/czwS6ER4wp" is a generic name for a class of goods or services only if the term has that meaning to consumers." https://t.co/m3w1y4X6lA
wetrat: But can they trademark "Booking.yeah"?or "Booking.YoMama"
bhcompy: This seems like a common sense decision. Good to see something the bulk of the court agrees on
eKonk: My question: Let's say the company decides to no longer pay for the url. Can they use their trademark to prevent someone else from using it?
Peter Weyland: bhcompy: This seems like a common sense decision. Good to see something the bulk of the court agrees onI said this over in the other SCOTUS one, but in general SCOTUS rulings are pretty lopsided. They don't make the news as much, though.
dbirchall: The legal beagle's tweet didn't make it clear who actually won.The Fark headline did.Thanks, Fark.com™!