4251
Twitter
Facebook
Fark.com Mobile
Copyright © 1999 - 2022 Fark, Inc
Last updated: May 23 2022 13:44:47
Contact Us via Farkback | Report error | TOS/legal/privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Full site
Copyright © 1999 - 2022 Fark, Inc
Last updated: May 23 2022 13:44:47
Contact Us via Farkback | Report error | TOS/legal/privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Full site
ScaliaGinsberg would be disappointed thathisher successor has bungled textualism so badly today, for the sake of appealing tocollege campuses and editorial boardsreligious fundamentalists and Conservative think tanks. This was not judging, this was legislating - a brute force attack on our constitutional system," bemoanedCarrie Severino, president of the right-wing Judicial Crisis Network70% of voters concerned with reproductive rights.close
close
- but wants to "update" Roe v Wade to appease Evangelical outrage.
I suppose he wants to bring back Dredd Scott.
The guy is a bigoted scrotum
close
Hmm
Does that also mean the ADA is unconstitutional since the word disability isn't in there?
close
It's not much more complicated for trans people. "If I were a man, I'd be treated differently." Explain how that isn't discrimination based on sex.
close
freddyV: His argument that abortion isn't in the constitution.
Hmm
Does that also mean the ADA is unconstitutional since the word disability isn't in there?
Also not in the Constitution: Mandated number of justices on the Supreme Court.
Expand it to 29 and appoint 20 left-leaning judges.
close
Kubo: freddyV: His argument that abortion isn't in the constitution.
Hmm
Does that also mean the ADA is unconstitutional since the word disability isn't in there?
Also not in the Constitution: Mandated number of justices on the Supreme Court.
Expand it to 29 and appoint 20 left-leaning judges.
We had better hurry before the GQP run with the idea, such they win in 2022.
close
close
We've all moved past this childish notion, right?
close
close
AirForceVet: Kubo: freddyV: His argument that abortion isn't in the constitution.
Hmm
Does that also mean the ADA is unconstitutional since the word disability isn't in there?
Also not in the Constitution: Mandated number of justices on the Supreme Court.
Expand it to 29 and appoint 20 left-leaning judges.
We had better hurry before the GQP run with the idea, such they win in 2022.
The number of Justices is set by statute. It can't be changed without passing a new law.
close
freddyV: His argument that abortion isn't in the constitution.
Hmm
Does that also mean the ADA is unconstitutional since the word disability isn't in there?
Yes, Alito would almost certainly issue such a ruling if given the chance.
close
close
close
freddyV: His argument that abortion isn't in the constitution.
Hmm
Does that also mean the ADA is unconstitutional since the word disability isn't in there?
The word "disability" is in there three times.
/But I know what you mean.
close
Fart_Machine: This the same Alito who cited the legal opinion of someone who viewed spousal rape was acceptable as was burning witches. It's not the 17th century anymore.
Everyone is the hero in his own story.
He thinks this will make him a huge name in history.
close
close
close
close
close
close
So by his logic...
close
close
Pats_Cloth_Coat: When the bill of rights was written they didn't intend it to cover black folks.
So by his logic...
Well not the whole black folk, just 3/5ths of them.
close
Haha! The Constitution doesn't say anything about people with BROWN eyes, therefore people with brown eyes are not protected under any civil rights afforded to everyone else.
close