8231
Twitter
Facebook
Fark.com Mobile
Copyright © 1999 - 2021 Fark, Inc
Last updated: Aug 10 2021 11:44:04
Contact | Report error | TOS/legal/privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Full site
Copyright © 1999 - 2021 Fark, Inc
Last updated: Aug 10 2021 11:44:04
Contact | Report error | TOS/legal/privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Full site
Confabulat: Ok, Nabb1:
The first rule of making a joke:
Make it funny.
Next, make it comprehensible. I have no idea what the hell you were trying to do there, but you clearly failed miserably. But I'll give you benefit of the doubt: You're just a terrible comedian, not a complete retard. Have I got that right?
Why do you care? If I made a bad joke about, say, dentists, or maybe something like the Department of Motor Vehicles, would you be on me like this? Or is it something else that has stirred your emotions to the point of even debating this?
close
Nabb1: If I made a bad joke about, say, dentists, or maybe something like the Department of Motor Vehicles, would you be on me like this?
I DON'T care.
I just like piling on retards.
close
Nabb1: It's not the intent, but it is a guilty pleasure
I don't buy the first part of that at all but the second part seems genuine.
So this is the "much adieu about nothing" Obama bashing (or by proxy Michelle Obama) thread for the day? Well... enjoy trying to tear them down over piddly shiat. It's quite impressive.
Oh... and Nabb1, stop pretending that you're not trying to annoy people. It's obvious you take pleasure from annoying people, just admit that is who you really are and accept it. We do.
close
KaponoFor3: I love it -- personal attacks on President Bush and his wife, albeit unfunny ones, are totally OK and anyone who got their panties in a wad because of them clearly just has a sandy vagina or is a GOP neoc0n cork sucker. Dissent is patriotic!
Personal attacks are funny in the right situation...
KaponoFor3: But if you dare say something about "America's Royalty" (which I heard them referred to one more than one news show last night)...
Nothing wrong with saying something about them, just expect to be called on it if you say something stupid.
As an example, look at what Nabb1 said here and the response and compare it to this thread.
close
Nabb1: Or is it something else that has stirred your emotions to the point of even debating this?
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that it is an entire threads worth of defense put forth on your joke that you keep harping on.
I mean, you're still in here defending the bit.
But, if it helps you and your narrative, I can guess that he is attacking you because he is in love with Obama and he is just upset that you sullied their good name.
close
Fail somewhere, but not the part of Michelle Obama.
close
Confabulat: Oh cry me a river, loser. I suppose you LOVE the damned Queen of England
I don't really give a shiat about the Queen of England, I just find the double standard amusing. I think this entire thing is made up by the British press, which is worse (in a tabloid sense) than the US press. It's manufactured stupidity.
close
close
KaponoFor3: I think this entire thing is made up by the British press, which is worse (in a tabloid sense) than the US press. It's manufactured stupidity.
Why are you attacking Nabb1 like that? Don't you know he was just trying to make a joke?
close
Confabulat: Nabb1: If I made a bad joke about, say, dentists, or maybe something like the Department of Motor Vehicles, would you be on me like this?
I DON'T care.
I don't believe you.
JohnnyC: Oh... and Nabb1, stop pretending that you're not trying to annoy people. It's obvious you take pleasure from annoying people, just admit that is who you really are and accept it. We do.
And yet, you are annoyed enough to respond. Let's face it, if I fit any sort of pattern here, I'm not alone. Not by a long shot. Yes, I can easily predict who will show up in a thread and who will become confrontational on some level, like say:
bulldg4life: I mean, you're still in here defending the bit.
And you're still going on about it. It had nothing to do with you whatsoever, and yet, here you are, hours after the fact, debating it with me. Which, by the way, is really no surprise at all.
close
close
close
JohnnyC: Mentat: In those pictures it doesn't look like the Queen likes them very much.
She has this in common with the American people.
close
Nabb1: I don't believe you.
Well rats.
close
cryinoutloud: You know, all those pictures of the Queen giving the evil eye to other country's leaders doesn't say much for her manners either. Christ, most of us learn to hide our dislike for people we're forced to be around when we're in grade school.
Dude, that's just how she LOOKS.
close
GAT_00: Diogenes: Perhaps, but I view it as a sign of respect for the host country. When in Rome and all that.
The queen ignored her own protocol first, so there is that.
HAN TOUCHED FIRST
close
Nabb1: Yes, I can easily predict who will show up in a thread and who will become confrontational on some level, like say:
Did you predict that KaponoFor3 would insult you the way he did?
close
Nabb1: And you're still going on about it. It had nothing to do with you whatsoever, and yet, here you are, hours after the fact, debating it with me. Which, by the way, is really no surprise at all.
lol
I just saw the thread 30 minutes ago. Sorry for posting in a thread on Fark.
But if you want to knock me down a peg for discussing something on Fark, go right ahead.
close
awfulperson: HAN TOUCHED FIRST
I knew in my heart of hearts that this was George Lucas' fault.
close
Obdicut: Nabb1: Yes, I can easily predict who will show up in a thread and who will become confrontational on some level, like say:
Did you predict that KaponoFor3 would insult you the way he did?
No, but my second is already in touch with his, and we are resolving the matter with pistols, at dawn, by the river.
close
God forbid I read the Upcoming links page and comment in the soon-to-be-green thread that already has a ton of comments in it and I comment on the one thing people are already discussing.
It is obvious that I got a tingling in my Fark-sense and rushed to defend defend defend.
close
bulldg4life: lol
I just saw the thread 30 minutes ago. Sorry for posting in a thread on Fark.
But if you want to knock me down a peg for discussing something on Fark, go right ahead.
Mmm... yes, you were just posting in a Fark thread. It just so happened that you came in with unsolicited commentary about a poor joke I made about someone named "Obama" hours prior to your appearance. That of all the things you could have offered to the discussion, you just happened to single out me and my apparent lead balloon of a barb. Yes, indeed....
close
Nabb1: Mmm... yes, you were just posting in a Fark thread. It just so happened that you came in with unsolicited commentary about a poor joke I made about someone named "Obama" hours prior to your appearance. That of all the things you could have offered to the discussion, you just happened to single out me and my apparent lead balloon of a barb. Yes, indeed....
Um...I didn't respond to your original comment at all. If I did, I would've quoted it and called you a 'tard for judging someone and such. Instead, I was responding to your amazement that people were attacking you over and over because of that weird joke.
Do you see the difference between discussing the original comment and discussing the dust-up that it caused? I'm sure you can see that.
And, why are you shocked that you were singled out? You're the only person in this thread that has been commenting in here for 3 hours and a huge percentage of the comments are directed to you or from you. How does that shock you?
close
bulldg4life: And, why are you shocked that you were singled out? You're the only person in this thread that has been commenting in here for 3 hours and a huge percentage of the comments are directed to you or from you. How does that shock you?
It doesn't shock me. It's predictable. Too predictable, really. If I've made a bad joke in a thread about Obama, as sure as the sun will rise, you will show up and offer your critique of either the joke or me.
close
Nabb1: No, but my second is already in touch with his, and we are resolving the matter with pistols, at dawn, by the river.
Better idea: Let the seconds go do it instead. Problem solved. Though I can see why you'd be upset at him, given how harsh he was to you in this thread.
So by the way, here are some funny statements from the thread:
beve: Told you she was uppity.
cpw49684: The queen was copping a feel
NikolaiFarkoff: You'd think this was akin to her walking up with up "Sup, baby, how u livin'?! Gimme some suga!" and a fist bump.
Did she have bare arms?
And then here's a statement without a bit of humor in it:
Nabb1: I do so get a kick out of the "ugly American" stereotype being perpetuated all the way up to the First Lady, even though she has an Ivy League education and the President has an army of staffers to brief her on the proper etiquette when meeting royalty. It's so charming to see than at the end of the day, the First Lady is as much as an uncultured, ignorant rube as the most simplistic of American morons.
You seem to have this weird problem where you mistake abuse for jokes. Simple abuse isn't a joke. It's not a failed joke, or a bad joke-- it's just abuse.
I don't find what you said in the least bit offensive, or unsettling. It's just eye-rolling-ly dumb.
close