8231
Twitter
Facebook
Fark.com Mobile
Copyright © 1999 - 2021 Fark, Inc
Last updated: Aug 10 2021 11:44:26
Contact | Report error | TOS/legal/privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Full site
Copyright © 1999 - 2021 Fark, Inc
Last updated: Aug 10 2021 11:44:26
Contact | Report error | TOS/legal/privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Full site
Nabb1: And yet, you are annoyed enough to respond.
Actually what I said to you was specifically about your intent. You claimed it wasn't to annoy people. I say that's bullshiat and you go out of your way to annoy people. Hell.. even now... you're still trying to do it right now. But oddly it seems like you're trying to play yourself off as a victim of happenstance. I don't buy that at all. Let's go over this step by step so maybe you'll get what I'm saying.
Step 1: Say something over the top and insulting to or about someone.
Step 2: Be chastised for your comment by your peers.
Step 3: Claim you were making a joke (because to you being insulting to or about something is "funny").
Step 4: Pretend you weren't trying to be annoying to people.
Step 5: Point the finger at anyone except yourself as to where the problem stems from.
Sound about right? Cutting too close to the bone? Hard to admit to yourself that you really did intend to be insulting since you think being insulting is "funny". Yeah... I'm sure it is.
Now... the real meat and potatoes comes into play for you. Now you get to play the victim and tell us all about how oppressed your opinion is and how you can't speak up with someone tearing you down (which ironically is what you were trying to (and have been trying to do) to the Obamas for quite some time). Be sure to really play up the victimization aspect. Nothing says entertainment like painting a target on your back and running around down range screaming "Shoot me! Why are you shooting me?!"... it's farking hilarious. And by "hilarious", I mean pathetic, weak, tired, and played out.
close
close
Nabb1: It doesn't shock me. It's predictable. Too predictable, really. If I've made a bad joke in a thread about Obama, as sure as the sun will rise, you will show up and offer your critique of either the joke or me.
I would like to think that I respond disproportionately towards comments from you no matter who or what they are directed at. I have you farkied and (I've said this countless times) I make a point of reading your comments because, most of the time, you are somewhere in the realm of reasonable. There is a group of 5-10 people that I will usually comment towards because I enjoy their comments and I enjoy seeing their opinions on things.
Of course I'm going to comment. I used to post more than anyone on this site...of course I'm going to comment.
close
JohnnyC: Step 2: Be chastised for your comment by your peers.
I notice a flaw in your logic here.
close
JohnnyC: Nothing says entertainment like painting a target on your back and running around down range screaming "Shoot me! Why are you shooting me?!"... it's farking hilarious. And by "hilarious", I mean pathetic, weak, tired, and played out.
I think you nailed it with this comment.
close
"You have a really weird sense of humor if you were originally trying to make a joke."
close
KaponoFor3: This Nabb1 versus everyone else slapfight is getting a little out of hand.
Well stop picking on him, then. Your condemnation of him is just as harsh as anyone else's in the thread.
close
KaponoFor3: I notice a flaw in your logic here.
Haha I was hesitant to put "peers" in there as well, but since we're all currently TF in here, I thought "peers" would fit. In retrospect, maybe "peers" is taking it too far.
close
Obdicut: I don't find what you said in the least bit offensive, or unsettling. It's just eye-rolling-ly dumb.
Oh, dear, well, we can't have that, now can we?
JohnnyC: And by "hilarious", I mean pathetic, weak, tired, and played out.
Oh, please, it's no more pathetic, weak, tired, and played out than the wailing and gnashing of teeth from the hopesters. You people make this stuff so personally.
close
Obdicut: Well stop picking on him, then. Your condemnation of him is just as harsh as anyone else's in the thread.
I feel bad for Nabb1 that Kaponofor3 was piling on like that. I hope he'll apologize.
close
Obdicut: Well stop picking on him, then. Your condemnation of him is just as harsh as anyone else's in the thread
Oh come on now, you are just being purposefully obtuse now. My condemnation was of the ridiculous amount of attention this stupid issue is getting from everyone -- Fark posters, British press, US press -- everyone.
close
KaponoFor3: JohnnyC: Step 2: Be chastised for your comment by your peers.
I notice a flaw in your logic here.
I was going to let that bit of presumptuousness slide, but well, there's that.
close
The Onanist: I feel bad for Nabb1 that Kaponofor3 was piling on like that. I hope he'll apologize
Nope, we're going to play a game of 1-on-1 basketball to 13 by ones. Loser is forced to take on the other person's caseload for a week.
close
Obdicut: KaponoFor3: This Nabb1 versus everyone else slapfight is getting a little out of hand.
Well stop picking on him, then. Your condemnation of him is just as harsh as anyone else's in the thread.
Yes, but that will be resolved at dawn, so your attention to it is no longer necessary, though I do thank you for your concern.
close
doublesecretprobation: seriously, just shut the fark up.
You have to be careful when talking to the self appointed monitor of what everyone is allowed to post around here.
Or just put the arrogant f*ckwad on ignore, like I did months ago.
close
Nabb1: Oh, dear, well, we can't have that, now can we?
Sure we can. What on earth are you talking about? You just did it.
Is there anything about the scenario of you making an idiotic statement, followed by people calling that statement idiotic, that confuses you?
Or is your failure to comprehend around the area of jokes, where you think that simply abusing someone is automatically a joke?
close
Nabb1: And yet, you are annoyed enough to respond.
*snerk*
close
KaponoFor3: The Onanist: I feel bad for Nabb1 that Kaponofor3 was piling on like that. I hope he'll apologize
Nope, we're going to play a game of 1-on-1 basketball to 13 by ones. Loser is forced to take on the other person's caseload for a week.
Uh, I hate to tell you this, but my second has already been in touch with yours about that. Pistols. Dawn. River.
close
Nabb1: the First Lady is as much as an uncultured, ignorant rube
She is.
Nabb1: as the most simplistic of American morons.
You all are.
/Nabb1: I laughed at your boobies.
close
Also, its a stupid custom and I'm glad we don't have royalty here. I'd pay the Jackass crew to touch royalty all day long if we had royalty...and Howie Mandel.
close
Nabb1: Oh, dear, well, we can't have that, now can we?
Well, personally, I think you made the mistake of not going over the top with your comment. Whether you realize it or not, someone will eventually make a comment similar to yours and they will be serious. And, given the tone in which you made your comment (and your past comments), it isn't out of the question to think that you are intentionally calling the First Lady ignorant and such because you are appalled at her actions.
It is the internet. So, nobody can tell if your facial expressions or tone would give up the air of humor in describing your "joke". Poe's Law or some such.
Now, if you wanted to go down the avenue of condemning her for this, you should've thrown in something about communism, ruining America, attractive and successful Americans, or Led Zeppelin song titles. Crank that biatch up to 11 and it would've been funny.
close
Nabb1: from the hopesters.
JohnnyC: Step 1: Say something over the top and insulting to or about someone.
So you want to go ahead and skip Step 2 and move right on to Step 3?
close
KaponoFor3: Nope, we're going to play a game of 1-on-1 basketball to 13 by ones. Loser is forced to take on the other person's caseload for a week.
Sweet. Put it on YouTube.
close
Obdicut: Or is your failure to comprehend around the area of jokes, where you think that simply abusing someone is automatically a joke?
"Abuse" is a bit much, no? How can it be abuse if Mrs. Obama is not personally affected or even aware of what I posted? Unless she's here under one or more of these logins, which, I have to admit, would explain a whole hell of a lot. I mean, usually abuse takes place on a direct, personal level.
close
KaponoFor3: Oh come on now, you are just being purposefully obtuse now. My condemnation was of the ridiculous amount of attention this stupid issue is getting from everyone -- Fark posters, British press, US press -- everyone.
Yes, it's getting a ridiculous amount of attention, you're definitely right. I mean, some people are even saying outrageously silly stuff like, "the First Lady is as much as an uncultured, ignorant rube as the most simplistic of American morons."
That's the kind of statement you're saying is part of the manufactured stupidity, right?
Nabb1: Yes, but that will be resolved at dawn, so your attention to it is no longer necessary, though I do thank you for your concern.
But he keeps doing it! He just did it again! The man has no shame.
close