Real News. Real Funny.

Comments

  • Hmm, local radio guy said the holes were so small you would have to roll the ballots up into a straw to get them in the bag. Those look bigger than straw sized holes but someone might notice a ballot rolled up to be stuffed in there.
  • ... still not convinced that there was election fraud on Prosser's side... but, damn there is a small mountain of circumstantial evidence building that is pointing in that direction.
  • the fact that the serial numbers were crossed out and new numbers written in does sound a wee bit suspicious, methinks.
  • That would appear to be a large enough opening that you could literally "stuff" ballots into that bag. Of course, why would anyone ever want to do that, in that municipality, with it's 98% voting rate.
  • Code_Archeologist: ... still not convinced that there was election fraud on Prosser's side... but, damn there is a small mountain of circumstantial evidence building that is pointing in that direction.


    It doesn't matter if it actually happened at this point. The mere appearance of cheating has been imprinted in the public's mind. Like we've learned from steroids in baseball. The appearance of cheating and getting caught cheating are no different when it comes to public opinion.
  • Code_Archeologist: ... still not convinced that there was election fraud on Prosser's side... but, damn there is a small mountain of circumstantial evidence building that is pointing in that direction.


    not necessarily prosser's side, but the Waukesha County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus, who has had this exact "clerical mistake" happen in that county before on her watch ...
  • Code_Archeologist: ... still not convinced that there was election fraud on Prosser's side... but, damn there is a small mountain of circumstantial evidence building that is pointing in that direction.


    How about the fact he's tried to block his own recount, which he can do as head of the Supreme Court?
  • Wisconsin is doing all they can to make Chicago politics look clean.
  • Crooks battling crooks for the last dollar in your pocket.
  • that's either massive incompetence or deliberate malfeasance. either way, it's grounds to invalidate the entire election and hold another one.
  • bradblog? Sounds legit.
  • Brad, your blog... well, it probably sucks, but I can't tell because it's farked.
  • Okay, aren't the republicans supposed to be better at this? You're letting down your side, guys!
  • Holy crap, shiat just got real.

    Weaver95: that's either massive incompetence or deliberate malfeasance


    What makes this so interesting is election after election, people have been saying this same line about the same lady in charge of the election in Waukesha.

    This isn't even the first time this lady has discovered votes at the last minute to change the results of an election. Of the two, I'm going with massive incompetence based on the evidence we've seen. But saying her incompetence is massive doesn't quite cover it.
  • Imagine the hell out of that.
  • lennavan:
    This isn't even the first time this lady has discovered votes at the last minute to change the results of an election. Of the two, I'm going with massive incompetence based on the evidence we've seen. But saying her incompetence is massive doesn't quite cover it.


    well either way, if the chain of custody is broken then either the election has to be redone OR all those votes have to be thrown out.
  • PanicMan: bradblog? Sounds legit.


    Got anything that refutes this?
  • lennavan: Holy crap, shiat just got real.

    Weaver95: that's either massive incompetence or deliberate malfeasance

    What makes this so interesting is election after election, people have been saying this same line about the same lady in charge of the election in Waukesha.

    This isn't even the first time this lady has discovered votes at the last minute to change the results of an election. Of the two, I'm going with massive incompetence based on the evidence we've seen. But saying her incompetence is massive doesn't quite cover it.


    Are her tits massive too? This is an important question. She could be losing votes in her cleavage.
  • GAT_00: Code_Archeologist: ... still not convinced that there was election fraud on Prosser's side... but, damn there is a small mountain of circumstantial evidence building that is pointing in that direction.

    How about the fact he's tried to block his own recount, which he can do as head of the Supreme Court?


    What kind of retarded State doesn't forsee that kind of obvious conflict of interest in it's proceedures and legislation
  • PanicMan: bradblog? Sounds legit.


    LockeOak: Brad, your blog... well, it probably sucks, but I can't tell because it's farked.


    www.bradblog.comView Full Size
  • Thorndyke Barnhard: What kind of retarded State doesn't forsee that kind of obvious conflict of interest in it's proceedures and legislation


    ...Wisconsin?
  • "When the ballot bags were taken out and placed upon the counting table, we were literally stunned,"

    GODAMMIT SO MUCH...no, you were NOT "literally" stunned.

    "5 out of the 6 ballot bags were almost literally wide open, and ballots could be clearly seen."

    They were either wide-open or they weren't. If they were, then yes, they WERE "literally" wide-open, and there's no "almost" about it.

    Or is this just one of those people who literally uses literally in literally ever literal sentence literally?

    /as for the article itself, color me shocked
  • Weaver95: lennavan:
    This isn't even the first time this lady has discovered votes at the last minute to change the results of an election. Of the two, I'm going with massive incompetence based on the evidence we've seen. But saying her incompetence is massive doesn't quite cover it.

    well either way, if the chain of custody is broken then either the election has to be redone OR all those votes have to be thrown out.


    I agree. What a cluster fark.
  • Load 25 of 270 newer comments
  •  

This thread is closed to new comments.