Real News. Real Funny.
ShawnDoc: I also don't think this was intended to be "black face", so much as the idea of everything being coated in chocolate powder, with just her lipstick being unscathed for contrast. Like those photos where you turn everything to grayscale except for a flower, or the person's blue eyes or something.They didn't go for the exaggerated lips, leave the area around the eyes unpainted or give her a black hairstyle like in a typical blackface, nor is there anything else going on in the messaging to imply racial overtones.
The_Original_Roxtar: where was your farking outrage then?
Shades: Simple explanation- for the Left, it's always 1965. It has to be. If they had to admit to the actual lack of racism, they'd never win another election. Drummed-up incidents like these, which are completely baseless, are entirely necessary for them to get their base stirred up and keep them on the plantation.
Fark.com MobileCopyright © 1999 - 2015 Fark, Inc Last updated: May 25 2015 13:32:48
Contact | Report error | TOS/legal/privacyFull site